You really are one UNINFORMED IDIOT!!maineman » 19 Apr 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ and... interestingly enough, Disney is still worth TWICE as much as it was just a decade ago... and ten times as much as FOX..... probably even more after yesterday!
Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Go Woke, Go Broke. Disney is another casualty of the woke brigade. Normal people with families don't want to see *** and lesbians in kids movies. Nor do they want to be inundated with *** characters or Lesland themed rides, or even the Tranny-Bear Jamboree when they go Disney World/Land.
Disney went woke, people finally took note and now they are only worth half what they were 3 years ago. How does Disney plan on getting all of those family-oriented customers (I mean "guests") back again? They still do not have a clue. So, instead of refocusing their corporate efforts,DISNEY BEGINS FIRST ROUND OF MAJOR LAYOFFS BY CUTTING 7,000 JOBS
I have a friend who has several stores in the seattle area - tacoma, seattle and fife, to be precise. These are sandwich shops. When the minimum wage legislation had everyone ****, he raised his wages to 2 dollars ABOVE minimum. He recognized that unless he could hire and retain the best, the wage environment was going to be unkind. He needed producers - high steppers.Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ First, responding to your friend's scenario, this is why you need to have a good restaurant manager who is a wiz at hiring and scheduling. Yes, you actually have to invest some money in your manager and your employees if you want to get the ones that work. They generally can hire people who will not be trouble-makers. I'm going to bet a couple of things with regard to your friend's restaurant:Second, I think Disney is ripe for an activist investor or investor group to come in and take over its management. In fact, I'm wondering why this hasn't happened yet. I will need to look a bit further into the equity structure to try and figure this out. Carl Icahn, Paul Singer, Dan Loeb and/or Jeffrey Smith - y'all should be licking your chops, salivating over the wounded mouse by now. Who's gonna move first???
- He does not have a good manager who actively keeps his finger in the pool of restaurant workers.
- He isn't paying restaurant staff enough, and is probably behind the 8-ball of raising wages when other more successful restaurants beat him to it.
- Either he, or his manager, is not quick enough at firing bad employees. He should be doing this during the "probationary period".
- They aren't doing any background checks on new hires.
There is something pretty stupid about trying to **** in ron desantis' gravy bowl, though. They paid a hefty price for that ****.Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ Pink hair is somehow immoral?
I am no great fan of Disney, but compared to Exxon-Mobil, Disney is far less immoral.
There is nothing immoral about hiring gay young people to put on a Mickey suit, a Donald Duck suit, or a Goofy suit.
There is nothing immoral about Disney having special events days for LBTGQ people.
They HAVE to be protective, with pieces of **** like xavier infesting america.Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ We can argue about whether it is moral or not. I recognize that you and others have differing views from me as to what is moral.
However, there is no argument that catering to gays, trannies, lesbians, etc. is incompatible with most men-women with families. Gay-Land is not what couples with kids want when attending Disney Land. And, the vast amount of revenue coming from Disney theme parks and entertainment is from traditional male-female families with children. Children of which their parents are very protective. And, children these parents want to relive and even pass down their own "Disney Experience" they experienced as children.
When the pendulum swings, it will be razor sharp.Sumela » 19 Apr 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ The diseases will only accelerate.
Too much momentum in that direction.
This.Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ Disney is an expensive roller coaster ride that is still flying down the wrong set of tracks right now.
As the meskins say, con razon.Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Less than 40% of Disney visitors have children under 18 years of age.
When only 40% of attendees at a children's theme park are families with children, I would argue it appears to be at least some part of the issue. Parents are keeping their kids away from disney, because they want them PETTING gerbils - not shoving them up their asses while dancing to depeche mode.Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ That right there explains the thread title. Disney over extended itself.
As much as us normal people would like to hang it on Disney's "wokeness", that just isn't the case.
If you had any, it would be second hand, fruitcake.Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Epcot is part of Disney. I have no idea whether gay days include Epcot or not.
I am all for Disney making its own decisions, they don't need my advice and would not follow it anyway, if I had any.
Muh heads a spinnin'. The Hohenzollern was a splittin'.Cannonpointer » 19 Apr 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ When the pendulum swings, it will be razor sharp.
They will be a-hollerin' - and this time, it won't be the Hohenzollern.
Ya follerin'?
Well THAT **** on my schadenfreude. Thanks a **** hoohah.Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't take your money 'cause I like ya.![]()
https://wdwnt.com/2023/02/disney-parks- ... n-q1-2023/
It's more the nostalgia, boomers were raised on Disney and we raised our kids on Disney before the corporation went retarded.Cannonpointer » 19 Apr 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ When only 40% of attendees at a children's theme park are families with children, I would argue it appears to be at least some part of the issue. Parents are keeping their kids away from disney, because they want them PETTING gerbils - not shoving them up their asses while dancing to depeche mode.
Same here. I was a kid in the 60s, and steamboat willy was lame as a mother ****. Mickey mouse was nonexistant. And the micky mouse club was something for ***. I think donald duck was a disney character, and he was tolerable as filler between cartoons we liked on a saturday. Warner Brothers had the good **** - them, and to a lesser degree Hanna-Barbera. Disney wasn't ****.Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Interestingly, when I was a kid, I remember not really even knowing what Micky Mouse was. He wasn't in any cartoons I ever watched.
Lotta nigs? Be honest.
SERIOUSLY, ***?maineman » 19 Apr 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ and... interestingly enough, Disney is still worth TWICE as much as it was just a decade ago... and ten times as much as FOX..... probably even more after yesterday!
More beaners but nigs are well represented. Caucasians still rule the roost though, this **** is expensive and whites got more money.
Oh, it'll happen - that not just my jaw a-snappin'.Sumela » 19 Apr 2023, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Muh heads a spinnin'. The Hohenzollern was a splittin'.
Are you spittin' that Murica is in for a savin'?
![]()
Well done dear Sir, well done. I will a watchin' and a waitin', but likely from Pushkin'Cannonpointer » 19 Apr 2023, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, it'll happen - that not just my jaw a-snappin'.
History is no mystery - Dig what I'm mappin'. We'll stop their worthless yappin'.
We'll be lappin' em and cappin' em and slappin' em while they're fappin'. We'll catch the lazy cock suckers nappin'.
Let 'em stand on street corners rappin' until the day we start zappin'.
This ain't a wild surmise, though it always comes as a surprise. They will wake up to blood in our eyes and an end to their lies. They will surely be a-hollerin'. And this time, it won't be the Hohenzollern.
Is there a site designated period of mourning for Rupert?