Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
So what's the FACTS behind all this "existential global warming" as in the REAL "Earth's Temperature"??
So what's the FACTS behind all this "existential global warming" as in the REAL "Earth's Temperature"??
By Beekeeper
23 Apr 2023 7:10 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
23 Apr 2023 7:10 am
Just so happens, the FACTS are here!!
Now THIS is going to make these CHURCH OF THE GLOBAL WARMING go all pissy and stuff!! You can bet they already are assembling their new "prophesies' to counter the REALITY that there is ZERO EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... ge-123.png
In this calculation, the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F, and that is simply compared to temperature reported by all of the stations to obtain the absolute temperature deviation from “normal” at that moment.
The basis of this number comes from NASA GISS itself, from their FAQ page as seen in August 2016 as captured by the Wayback Machine.
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... -08-24.png
Now THIS is going to make these CHURCH OF THE GLOBAL WARMING go all pissy and stuff!! You can bet they already are assembling their new "prophesies' to counter the REALITY that there is ZERO EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... ge-123.png
In this calculation, the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F, and that is simply compared to temperature reported by all of the stations to obtain the absolute temperature deviation from “normal” at that moment.
The basis of this number comes from NASA GISS itself, from their FAQ page as seen in August 2016 as captured by the Wayback Machine.
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... -08-24.png
23 Apr 2023 7:20 am
Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Just so happens, the FACTS are here!!
Now THIS is going to make these CHURCH OF THE GLOBAL WARMING go all pissy and stuff!! You can bet they already are assembling their new "prophesies' to counter the REALITY that there is ZERO EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... ge-123.png
In this calculation, the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F, and that is simply compared to temperature reported by all of the stations to obtain the absolute temperature deviation from “normal” at that moment.
The basis of this number comes from NASA GISS itself, from their FAQ page as seen in August 2016 as captured by the Wayback Machine.
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... -08-24.png
Yer clearly a racist.
23 Apr 2023 7:24 am
I know, right!!
Since these FACTS don't support their "narrative", it has to be "racist". There is no other explanation or reason behind these FACTS.
23 Apr 2023 7:30 am
Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ I know, right!!
Since these FACTS don't support their "narrative", it has to be "racist". There is no other explanation or reason behind these FACTS.
It truly is a wonder what makes them tick.
23 Apr 2023 7:55 am
What is so amazing is that there have been countless predictions and prophesies from their "scientists" about what our climate is going to do.
TO DATE, not a single one has happened or materialized as they projected would happen- INCLUDING their "models" that they say is THE gold standard of forecasting!!
Yet, they still believe. I call that ABJECT INSANITY!!
23 Apr 2023 7:55 am
since there is no way of knowing what the nominal average temperature of the earth over its history s/b, they're chasing a fart in the wind...Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Just so happens, the FACTS are here!!
Now THIS is going to make these CHURCH OF THE GLOBAL WARMING go all pissy and stuff!! You can bet they already are assembling their new "prophesies' to counter the REALITY that there is ZERO EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... ge-123.png
In this calculation, the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F, and that is simply compared to temperature reported by all of the stations to obtain the absolute temperature deviation from “normal” at that moment.
The basis of this number comes from NASA GISS itself, from their FAQ page as seen in August 2016 as captured by the Wayback Machine.
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... -08-24.png
23 Apr 2023 7:56 am
I was thinking bigoted and uneducated...
23 Apr 2023 8:01 am
We should call Greta Thunberg and ask here to verify it.
23 Apr 2023 8:02 am
great idea... I like the way you think...
23 Apr 2023 8:03 am
Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ What is so amazing is that there have been countless predictions and prophesies from their "scientists" about what our climate is going to do.
TO DATE, not a single one has happened or materialized as they projected would happen- INCLUDING their "models" that they say is THE gold standard of forecasting!!
Yet, they still believe. I call that ABJECT INSANITY!!
I just call them kooks.
23 Apr 2023 8:04 am
23 Apr 2023 8:22 am
But for TODAY, we can use a REAL TIME methodology that is using a very high sampling of temps globally and then statistically generate an "average" that results in well, NO "existential climate change" that is occurring.ROG62 » 23 Apr 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ since there is no way of knowing what the nominal average temperature of the earth over its history s/b, they're chasing a fart in the wind...
Real-time Global Temperature
(updated every 1-2 minutes)
57.55°F / 14.19°C
Deviation: 0.35°F / 0.19°C
Stations processed last hour: 62239
23 Apr 2023 9:07 am
That was my first thought too.. well, actually it was.. facts, we don't need no stinking facts, just ask Greta.. but that amounts to the same thing, there's no reasoning with the global warming cult...
23 Apr 2023 9:10 am
Jantje_Smit » 23 Apr 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ That was my first thought too.. well, actually it was.. facts, we don't need no stinking facts, just ask Greta.. but that amounts to the same thing, there's no reasoning with the global warming cult...
IN SPITE of them having ZERO FACTS OR DATA that supports their claims, they STILL believe this crap!!
It's a RELIGION, not science.
23 Apr 2023 9:45 am
Agreed, but the fallacy is it's only the here and now...just like when you heard the torrential rains last week in Florida was a 1,000 year storm...since recorded weather data only goes back 140 yrs, I call **** as it's all for the sensationalism....so as in the earth's temperatures, the sea levels and the 'climate', what goes beyond the 140 yrs of actual data, is it's pure speculation....Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ But for TODAY, we can use a REAL TIME methodology that is using a very high sampling of temps globally and then statistically generate an "average" that results in well, NO "existential climate change" that is occurring.
Real-time Global Temperature
(updated every 1-2 minutes)
57.55°F / 14.19°C
Deviation: 0.35°F / 0.19°C
Stations processed last hour: 62239
24 Apr 2023 8:28 am
It is a religion and Greta is the high priestess.. just listen to the first few seconds...Beekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ IN SPITE of them having ZERO FACTS OR DATA that supports their claims, they STILL believe this crap!!
It's a RELIGION, not science.
https://youtu.be/eiqkJTUIOBY
24 Apr 2023 8:58 am
No SCIENCE involved. It's just a CULT of believers that have NO PROPHECIES they can point to that have materialized. He is right in that respect.Jantje_Smit » 24 Apr 2023, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ It is a religion and Greta is the high priestess.. just listen to the first few seconds...
https://youtu.be/eiqkJTUIOBY
24 Apr 2023 10:16 am
BREAKING – Just 0.3% of Scientists agree Humanity is causing Climate Change; NOT 97% as falsely spread by the UNBeekeeper » 23 Apr 2023, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Just so happens, the FACTS are here!!
Now THIS is going to make these CHURCH OF THE GLOBAL WARMING go all pissy and stuff!! You can bet they already are assembling their new "prophesies' to counter the REALITY that there is ZERO EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... ge-123.png
In this calculation, the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F, and that is simply compared to temperature reported by all of the stations to obtain the absolute temperature deviation from “normal” at that moment.
The basis of this number comes from NASA GISS itself, from their FAQ page as seen in August 2016 as captured by the Wayback Machine.
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/w ... -08-24.png
“97% Consensus” — What Consensus?
By Gregory Wrightstone, Executive Director CO2 Coalition
You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree on human-driven climate change. You may also have heard that those who don’t buy into the climate-apocalypse mantra are “science deniers.” The truth is that a whole lot more than 3% of scientists are sceptical of the party line on climate. A whole lot more.The many scientists, engineers and energy experts that comprise the CO2 Coalition are often asked something along the lines of: “So you believe in climate change, then?” Our answer? “Yes, of course we do: it has been happening for hundreds of millions of years.” It is important to ask the right questions. The question is not, “Is climate change happening?” The real question of serious importance is, “Is climate change now driven primarily by human actions? That question should be followed up by “is our changing climate beneficial or harmful to ecosystems and humanity?”There are some scientific truths that are quantifiable and easily proven, and with which, I am confident, at least 97% of scientists agree. Here are two:
- Carbon dioxide concentration has been increasing in recent years.
- Temperatures, as measured by thermometers and satellites, have been generally increasing in fits and starts for more than 150 years.
24 Apr 2023 10:17 am
What is the basis for the “97% consensus” notion? Is it true?
Hint: You can’t spell consensus without “con.”
If, indeed, 97% of all scientists truly believed that human activities were causing the moderate warming that we have seen in the last 150 years, it would be reasonable for one to consider this when determining what to believe. One would be wrong, however.Science, unlike religion, is not a belief system. Scientists, just like anyone else, will say that they believe things – whether they believe them or not – for social convenience, political expediency or financial profit. For this and other good reasons, science is not founded upon the beliefs of scientists. It is a disciplined method of inquiry, by which scientists apply pre-existing theory to observation and measurement, so as to develop or to reject a theory, so that they can unravel as clearly and as certainly as possible the distinction between what the Greek philosopher Anaximander called “that which is and that which is not.”Abu Ali ibn al-Haytham, the natural philosopher of 11th-century Iraq who founded the scientific method in the East, once wrote:
The seeker after truth [his beautiful description of the scientist] does not place his faith in any mere consensus, however venerable or widespread. Instead, he subjects what he has learned of it to inquiry, inspection and investigation. The road to the truth is long and hard, but that is the road we must follow.
https://expose-news.com/2023/04/21/less ... te-change/
This link totally destroys the 97% consensus notion as well as shows how Cook fraudulently manufactured the 97% consensus notion ......
Hint: You can’t spell consensus without “con.”
If, indeed, 97% of all scientists truly believed that human activities were causing the moderate warming that we have seen in the last 150 years, it would be reasonable for one to consider this when determining what to believe. One would be wrong, however.Science, unlike religion, is not a belief system. Scientists, just like anyone else, will say that they believe things – whether they believe them or not – for social convenience, political expediency or financial profit. For this and other good reasons, science is not founded upon the beliefs of scientists. It is a disciplined method of inquiry, by which scientists apply pre-existing theory to observation and measurement, so as to develop or to reject a theory, so that they can unravel as clearly and as certainly as possible the distinction between what the Greek philosopher Anaximander called “that which is and that which is not.”Abu Ali ibn al-Haytham, the natural philosopher of 11th-century Iraq who founded the scientific method in the East, once wrote:
The seeker after truth [his beautiful description of the scientist] does not place his faith in any mere consensus, however venerable or widespread. Instead, he subjects what he has learned of it to inquiry, inspection and investigation. The road to the truth is long and hard, but that is the road we must follow.
https://expose-news.com/2023/04/21/less ... te-change/
This link totally destroys the 97% consensus notion as well as shows how Cook fraudulently manufactured the 97% consensus notion ......
24 Apr 2023 10:21 am
There is science involved, the problem is that the science doesn't make any sense.. of course that isn't a problem for the cult members..Beekeeper » 24 Apr 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ No SCIENCE involved. It's just a CULT of believers that have NO PROPHECIES they can point to that have materialized. He is right in that respect.
Who is online
In total there are 3574 users online :: 7 registered, 14 bots, and 3553 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, MicroMessenger, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Googlebot, bingbot, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider