Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.
Men will forever snicker at someone holding a Bud Lite can or bottle...Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.
DeezerShoove » 28 Apr 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ Men will forever snicker at someone holding a Bud Lite can or bottle...
Forever.
I know I will never let the message die. Ever.
Bud Lite will be on suicide watch like a lot of trannies...
https://youtu.be/_m-7CrWkrFkVegas » 28 Apr 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ I really like Bud Lite, but you are right. I don't want to be looking over my shoulder while drinking it. It's embarrassing to be seen with it. I don't want *** coming over and hitting on me.
Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.
I hope not. There will be a lot of bad beer going badder.
Who said anything about being threatened by a picture (other than you)?Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.
Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.

Warcok » 28 Apr 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The left thinks they have a monopoly on boycotting. They believe it's their "thing".
Hobby lobby, Chick-fil-A, companies that advertise on Fox News Hannity and Tucker Carlson. And when some of these companies caved to left-wing demands and pulled ads, they celebrated, cheered and ran victory laps.
But the minute the right boycott's a company the left gets upset and cry
wow. bullying vs passive aggression working symbolism over substance against those paying for hope, faith, charity changes evolving as genetically here now.Vegas » 28 Apr 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ There has always been a significant difference between how the left protest vs how the right protest. The left prefers to draw attention to themselves. They march out in the streets yelling and chanting slogans. Love being on TV. Sometimes they enjoy vandalizing and rioting. The rate of success = 0%.
The right prefers to draw attention to the issue, not themselves. With the exception of a handful of people, like Kid Rock, most of the right don't want personal attention. We want the issue to be heard. How do we do it? By hitting the people responsible right where it counts the most, their pocketbook. Notice, we didn't march in the streets like a bunch of attention whores regarding the Bud Lite issue. We did one thing, that cost us no money, no pain, no effort. We boycotted. Consequently, they lost 7 billion dollars. That's how it's done. Rate of success = 100%.
Lefties, put your egos aside. Nobody cares about you personally. The companies that you protest don't care about your silly chants and signs. Hit them in the pocketbook, that always works.
Lets now hear @Xavier_Onassis deflect from the point while calling us bigots.
Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you were seriously threatened by the picture of a trans woman on a can of mediocre beer.
So you stopped drinking that beer. You sure taught them a lesson!
BUD stock has yet to decline in value, by the way.
