I asked before but I never got an answer.. well, not an answer that didn't evade the question.. lol.. what would a civil society governed by civic minds look like, would there be any laws?Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Because all laws legislating definitions of typecast people always protect those stereotyping their opposition as less than human.
Alpha minds, loyal we, us, obedient they, them, those must eliminate anyone not complying to social consensus how evolving should be managed for better tomorrows forward here now.
Genetics only changes population occupying space here now people change ancestral positions after parenting another generation gap forward here arriving last great great grandchild replacing their 4 previous generation gaps left alive with a completely different DNA than any previous generation in the lineage.
So all you civic minded typecast people pretending to be so above evolving intellectually training each great great grandchild to never accept their actual time living as eternally separated now get to direct outcomes as the healthy, wealthy, and wise leaders of anything else is possible.
I didn't see this until I added my 2nd post, which still answers your post here. Have a good evening, you are 5 or 6 time zones to the east of me, correct?Jantje_Smit » 29 Apr 2023, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑
I asked before but I never got an answer.. well, not an answer that didn't evade the question.. lol.. what would a civil society governed by civic minds look like, would there be any laws?
:blink:
Thanks, the timed apart is 6 hours so it isn't evening over yet.. that's what I meant, you answered my post but you didn't answer the question... would a now is eternity society have any laws?Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't see this until I added my 2nd post, which still answers your post here. Have a good evening, you are 5 or 6 time zones to the east of me, correct?
Hypothetical questioners won't accept anything more than a theoretical predetermined answer that fits their socially trained mind.Jantje_Smit » 29 Apr 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks, the timed apart is 6 hours so it isn't evening over yet.. that's what I meant, you answered my post but you didn't answer the question... would a now is eternity society have any laws?
:faint:
I would accept a simple yes or no, that would make my reasonable doubt go away... of course I would have other resonable doubts depending on the answer...Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Hypothetical questioners won't accept anything more than a theoretical predetermined answer that fits their socially trained mind.
It is the historical methodology used in every reality to sustain reasonable doubt into each generation gap arriving forward each ancestor arriving to replace their previous 4 generation gaps taught to mind what people ancestrally believe now.
However a simple yes or no to an intellectual character's mind is unconditional surrender of the person answering to the syllogism hidden in the question from a person serving a we mantra.Jantje_Smit » 29 Apr 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ I would accept a simple yes or no, that would make my reasonable doubt go away... of course I would have other resonable doubts depending on the answer...
:blink:
The problem has always been absolute power corrupts absolutely ......throughout history....Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Ritualizing realities into fruition each generation gap existed historically into current events, the healthy, wealthy, wise obtain power, wealth, fame by creating a chain of command fall people to always get blamed for nothing going forward as planned to be greater than eternally separated genetically here.
those controlling the hope, faith, charity hide in plain sight while those taking lead roles directing tomorrows are always held accountable and nothing changes the corruption never ends each generation gap added.
power of suggesting now isn't eternity to ancestors being eternally separated as genetically arriving one at a time now.Majik » 29 Apr 2023, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ The problem has always been absolute power corrupts absolutely ......throughout history....
Whether it be religious , political or monetary....
our founders knew this to be true and tried to circumvent this human flaw with the Constitution .....but as is always the case of every human society as time goes by the power of the governed is eroded by the corruption of power by the government .
I share your anger ....Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ power of suggesting now isn't eternity to ancestors being eternally separated as genetically arriving one at a time now.
I am mad as hell and I see what the concept of eternal hell comes from having learned the difference between actual life evolving and lifetimes pretending nobody can know everything about living self evidently alive now reciting all the possibilities that come with believing now isn't eternity.
Not enough to change your mind like I did 41 years ago. 16.5 years ago I figured out a way to reverse the effects of psychological class warfare done for 7,000 years.
Do you agree that Ignorance is the ruin of states?Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Not enough to change your mind like I did 41 years ago. 16.5 years ago I figured out a way to reverse the effects of psychological class warfare done for 7,000 years.
the word ignorance is a result of choices honored, promises kept and all the time nobody can explain evolving in plain sight as eternally separated as genetically here staying true to their vernacular tribalism used ancestrally so far.Majik » 29 Apr 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you agree that Ignorance is the ruin of states?
or that The psychology of negotiation and compromise has been replaced by the psychology of confrontation?
Yes, that would be accurate.. my mistake, if you answered a simple yes or no question then you would be enabling reasonable doubt and that would make you corrupt too... there can be no doubt about life in plain sight.. you can't blame me for trying though...Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ However a simple yes or no to an intellectual character's mind is unconditional surrender of the person answering to the syllogism hidden in the question from a person serving a we mantra.
True or consequences is one hell of a game played historically within this species working psychological class warfare 24/7 each generation gap still alive.
So I created my own way to label generation gaps a person might evolve through after birth until dead being eternally separated now.
Inception original ancestors became first original 2 parents of a second generation and siblings of the original arrivals DNA that didn't went extinct upon death even after their lived as long as their siblings did become 1 of 8 great grandparents.
so for there to ever been 8 great grandparents the second generation had to add a 3rd. and 3rd had to add a 4th. 4th had to add 5th way of arriving great great grandchild having 100% dominant genes from their last 4 generation gaps which by conception numbers is 30 specific displaced lifetimes creating a 5th generation gap that never duplicated its previous generations gaps
Everything after the 6th started recessive genes being 6.25% deducted from the 100% replacing previous 4. which technically bome 93.75% doesn't change even after 400 generation gaps since dawn of civilization.
Now we are at the great debate between church and state arguing when the planet began either 5 billion years ago or 7,00 years ago when intelelct began corrupting every next generation to current events.
See I understand syllogism weaponized by intellectual minds..
Am I completely accurate minus reasonable doubt? yes or no
Who is blaming you for defending reasonable doubt, I explain how you constantly protect it?Jantje_Smit » 30 Apr 2023, 4:18 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, that would be accurate.. my mistake, if you answered a simple yes or no question then you would be enabling reasonable doubt and that would make you corrupt too... there can be no doubt about life in plain sight.. you can't blame me for trying though...
:blink:
You think projecting reasonable doubt is a bad thing so that makes those defending it corrupt and in denial, that sounds like blaming to me...Nostradamus'omh » 30 Apr 2023, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ Who is blaming you for defending reasonable doubt, I explain how you constantly protect it?
There is a difference ever so subtle like a nuance of a missing link in real time defined by relative time logistics.
evil/live. actions and rctions combined between each ancestor genetics eternally separates now. People like to use the analogy a house divided will not stand now apply that to a species that refuses to accept reproductions are eternally separated now every generation after dawn of civilization since there were maybe thousand generations before verbal languages started making **** up and driving it to social fruition by power of suggesting maybe genetics doesn't eternally separated us now.Jantje_Smit » 30 Apr 2023, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ You think projecting reasonable doubt is a bad thing so that makes those defending it corrupt and in denial, that sounds like blaming to me...
:faint:
Nostradamus'omh » 29 Apr 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Hypothetical questioners won't accept anything more than a theoretical predetermined answer that fits their socially trained mind.
Are YOU a "hypothetical questioner, sole? Can you name any "hypothetical questioners"?
It is the historical methodology used in every reality to sustain reasonable doubt into each generation gap arriving forward each ancestor arriving to replace their previous 4 generation gaps taught to mind what people ancestrally believe now.
Ancestors are pretty much all deceased. They are not arriving, they have already departed.
No ancestors have ever replaced people presently in control.
If you think they have, name them.
You do not seem to understand the meaning of the word "ancestor".