There are more white poor people than black, racist.Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Why are they poor?
Because 90% of the wealth in this country is owned by a teensy percentage of the population.
You don't want poor people to reproduce.
If you are a typical White American, you have not reproduced enough for the consumer economy to grow, which is what it must do.
Race is clearly related to poverty, and poverty is clearly is related to economics.
If there is not a sufficient number of unemployed poor people, then the employers are forced to give up more of their wealth to pay them.
That would result in more competition for the employers.
After God told Adam and Ever to be fruitful and multiply, that is what they did. But God failed to inform them of the whole truth, that in a few generations, he would end up flooding the entire planet, leaving only Noah, Noah's wife and Noah's sons and their wives. Only eight people would he spare. And of COURSE God knew the future because he knows everything. There are lots and lots of lives that God did not treat as sacred, like the Canaanite inhabitants of Jericho, who did nothing to deserve to be attacked by Joshua and his illegal immigrant invaders.Monderegal » 01 May 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ The Bible says in Genesis that God instructed Adam and Eve, Noah, and Abraham to be fruitful and multiply. That's the theological argument for holding all life as precious and a gift. It doesn't matter if you grow up poor in my estimation. Success and money can be a religion too.
I’m agnostic, I have no use for what the Bible says.Monderegal » 01 May 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ The Bible says in Genesis that God instructed Adam and Eve, Noah, and Abraham to be fruitful and multiply. That's the theological argument for holding all life as precious and a gift. It doesn't matter if you grow up poor in my estimation. Success and money can be a religion too.
Well, you may be on the right track, then.
I answer the kinetic how and why things become intellectually defined factually inaccurate all the time regardless which generation gaps use same facts over and over every generation past, current, future.Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Damn my answer is accurate to all your 4 questions.
What answer? You have answered nothing. All you do is gibber and blather.
Nostradamus'omh » 01 May 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I answer the kinetic how and why things become intellectually defined factually inaccurate all the time regardless which generation gaps use same facts over and over every generation past, current, future.
WTF is "kinetic how and why"? You answer nothing you blather on and on about seven degrees of eternal separation of the rule of 72 cradle until putrefaction.
It is what theist, theorists, theologists do. Disciples of doubt about actual evolving being physically self evident reproductions are eternally separated since conceived one at a time never same compounded DNA twice.
Blathering gibberish, gibbering balderdash.
There is no such thing as a "theologist" There are theologians, none of whom is a "disciple of doubt."
Words are not necessarily related because they begin with the same three letters.
Every person of character is a theologist assuming genetics cannot eternally separate them while self evidently here one at a time. Every director of tomorrows is theologian promising an eternal soul after death, every politician promises better days tomorrow, and every thologist swears an oath to die to defend maybes cradle to grave all 5 current generations practicing same traditions historically into current events.Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑
WTF is "kinetic how and why"? You answer nothing you blather on and on about seven degrees of eternal separation of the rule of 72 cradle until putrefaction.
Blathering gibberish, gibbering balderdash.
There is no such thing as a "theologist" There are theologians, none of whom is a "disciple of doubt."
Words are not necessarily related because they begin with the same three letters.
Nostradamus'omh » 01 May 2023, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Every person of character is a theologist assuming genetics cannot eternally separate them while self evidently here one at a time. Every director of tomorrows is theologian promising an eternal soul after death, every politician promises better days tomorrow, and every thologist swears an oath to die to defend maybes cradle to grave all 5 current generations practicing same traditions historically into current events.
I instinctively understood what was meant when I was told by society and family alike to read between the lines of hope, faith, charity, power, wealth, fame to find what delivers social mayhem, madness, misery 24/7 logistical time genetics only delivers adapting to the moment here since conceived..
Retired cable splice that watched how networks to communicate were developed for instant communication around the world reducing the 24/7 narrative to life only exists mutually evolving in series parallel time displaced as ancestrally present behaving as socially going on now.Monderegal » 01 May 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you do for a living omh? Are you a scientist or something?
I believe that he described himself as a disgruntled refrigerator or xerox repairman. He was, of course, unfairly dismissed.Monderegal » 01 May 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you do for a living omh? Are you a scientist or something?
Since all you do is believe in something other than how life does evolve, you don't know about anything specific except never accept your specific time evolving forward here.Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I believe that he described himself as a disgruntled refrigerator or xerox repairman. He was, of course, unfairly dismissed.
Monderegal » 29 Apr 2023, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems that there are those who have come out against some people having kids. Poverty, perceived and actual behavior of some adults, even the pressure some kids feel to embrace the gay lifestyle. Are we ever going to reach positive demographics again in this type of environment?
Where is your proof of this? The reason why most people in the US aren't having kids is people are getting married later or not married at all. The family structure is different. Society does not value families as it used to.Xavier_Onassis » 29 Apr 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ White Americans are upset because people who are not White are an ever increasing percentage of the population.
The consumer economy depends on constant growth, which means that for the economy to grow, then the population must grow.
Being as White Americans have only two or fewer children, then the only way that the population can grow is to import people from other countries.
The main reason why White Americans have fewer children is that their wages have been stagnant in real dollar terms since Reagan in the early 1980's. Note that Reagan authorized millions of illegal immigrants to become citizens. Reagan knew who wrote his scripts and it sure as hell was not the American working class, or the middle class.
It was in the early 1980's that most families had working wives. This is because it was the only way for them to maintain their status and pay the bills.
Productivity has increased enormously... but the salaries of the most productive workers have not come close to rising with the productivity of the wage earners.
You hear of invitro fertilization? Artificial insemination? sperm banks, egg harvesting, cloning? I continue having no problem to implode your denying life in plain sight.Xavier_Onassis » 02 May 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ MY screen name during our conversation was bloodless Armageddon. Since watching the History Channel's propaganda about end of time I discovered what has caused my 56 years of feeling I didn't belong anywhere in any reality not even my own family.
Bloodless Armageddon!
What is next?
Dickless sex?
The History Channel used to be about actual history. Humans will never run out of history.
But they somehow like to focus on Extraterrestrials and Nazis.
tick tick goes your relative time semantics creating statistically averaged facts pitting the common denominator(now was always the balance point between parent child combinations since inception of ancestries creating one species against each reproduction present.Xavier_Onassis » 02 May 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ You hear of invitro fertilization? Artificial insemination? sperm banks, egg harvesting, cloning? I continue having no problem to implode your denying life in plain sight.
-------------------------------------------------------------
You implode nothing.You make no sense and think that Paul was once a Peter.
Did you try to rob Saul's peter to rob Paul?