the person you quoted so you don't ever give up what you follow, was incorrect about the whole situation. Tucker Carlson pissed of the wrong audience share that usually never watches the channel anyway., not the management of Fox.
I luved Tucker!!!
lol, uh huh, rightNostradamus'omh » 30 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ the person you quoted so you don't ever give up what you follow, was incorrect about the whole situation. Tucker Carlson pissed of the wrong audience share that usually never watches the channel anyway., not the management of Fox.
Tucker will be back.sootedupCyndi » 30 Apr 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I luved Tucker!!!
I don't like Hannity's personality- but its on- in the middle of the night in the back ground...
He does a good job on the Hunter Biden scandals... and He does a ton of Braindeads gaffs... I can't get to the tv fast enough. And my eyes bug out in horror.LOL
Talk radio is much better. A guest will come on and talk a good 35 minutes on a particular scandal or topic... Where that same guest is cut off within a few minutes on the tv interview because of time....
What you saying exactly? The stockholders or the gubmint.Nostradamus'omh » 30 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ the person you quoted so you don't ever give up what you follow, was incorrect about the whole situation. Tucker Carlson pissed of the wrong audience share that usually never watches the channel anyway., not the management of Fox.
A mind that cannot navigate evolving in plain sight only preforms as what a social consensus believes is true.
I know. Sometimes the info I hear on talk radio is so wild... I think. O-O-O. I have to repeat that. By the next day. It's outta my head. But the gist is still in there.. lots of news these days... and so much of it could be BS.
Cyndi, you constantly have a choice to follow social consensus or navigate evolving as naturally alive. Do you completely understand that natural existence gives humanity eternity to change its mind when every great great grandchild arrives replacing its 30 people donated their DNA forward to that specific conception adapting to the moment here society converts to protecting legal stereotype they follow cradle to grave.sooted up Cyndi » 30 Apr 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ What you saying exactly? The stockholders or the gubmint.
i heard the stock holders were pizzed because of all the coming lawsuits?
Not really. You talk a bit like Kamla Harris- our lovely VP. And i cant understand her either.Nostradamus'omh » 30 Apr 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Cyndi, you constantly have a choice to follow social consensus or navigate evolving as naturally alive. Do you complete understand that natural existence gives humanity eternity to change its mind when every great great grandchild arrives replacing its 30 people donated their DNA forward to that specific conception adapting to the moment here society converts to protecting legal stereotype they follow cradle to grave.
Eternity evolving forward in plain sight is a constant second chance to stop denying now is eternity. yet in 400 generation or 101 since Christ was nailed to a cross the pagan empire adopted the mythology they created a bible to be used against other people's ancestries globally, until extinction arrived.
BS and distraction much of it, yes.sootedupCyndi » 30 Apr 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I know. Sometimes the info I hear on talk radio is so wild... I think. O-O-O. I have to repeat that. By the next day. It's outta my head. But the gist is still in there.. lots of news these days... and so much of it could be BS.
A mind doesn't accept adapt or become extinct natural rules equally applied to any reproduction native to this atmosphere rules but invents laws defending human rights to believe life exceeds the natural compounding of chromosomes changing population by the numbers in plain sight of limited to mutually evolving forward now.sooted up Cyndi » 30 Apr 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Not really. You talk a bit like Kamla Harris- our lovely VP. And i cant understand her either. :blush: :die:
Beer Gate was fun- So wasn't Tucker. We all need a fun break once in awhile. SO- play along.
He will no return to Fox.
I don't think he meant that literally. He will never return to fox. He will show up- like a Joe Rogan ... be More popular.Xavier_Onassis » 30 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He will no return to Fox.
He was fired by the management of Fox.
Basically Murdoch fired the Figplucker because the Figplucker was getting too "uppity".
HE CAN NEVER MATCH THE INCOME HE MADE WITH FOX, BUT WHAT HE SHOWED US ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPARENCY IN AMERICA AND HOW MUCH MORE THAN MEANT TO HIM WAS MOMENTOUS.sootedupCyndi » 30 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think he meant that literally. He will never return to fox. He will show up- like a Joe Rogan ... be More popular.
why is he still on the payroll then? he's still under contract.Xavier_Onassis » 30 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He will no return to Fox.
He was fired by the management of Fox.
Basically Murdoch fired the Figplucker because the Figplucker was getting too "uppity".
yes as he did... like Musk... to me he is a hero? he bought a company that cost him a fortune... to expose it all!righteous » 30 Apr 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ HE CAN NEVER MATCH THE INCOME HE MADE WITH FOX, BUT WHAT HE SHOWED US ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPARENCY IN AMERICA AND HOW MUCH MORE THAN MEANT TO HIM WAS MOMENTOUS.
How so?Xavier_Onassis » 30 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He will no return to Fox.
He was fired by the management of Fox.
Basically Murdoch fired the Figplucker because the Figplucker was getting too "uppity".