Liberal Forum

  ttps://truthout.org/articles/florida-passes-bill-that-allows-for-legal-kidnapping-of-transgender-children/
 

 

You Liberals are **** stupid.

Xavier_Onassis » 05 May 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 4:56 pm

  ttps://truthout.org/articles/florida-passes-bill-that-allows-for-legal-kidnapping-of-transgender-children/

Several Blue States have passed legislation that allow the State to take custody of "transitioning" children against their parents wishes.

I missed your outrage over that... not surprisingly.

I think the State should step in if a kid is being abused. Obviously you don't, you sick ****.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 May 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 4:56 pm

  ttps://truthout.org/articles/florida-passes-bill-that-allows-for-legal-kidnapping-of-transgender-children/

Kidnapping is a crime...the legislation would allow for a LEGAL removal.  Most states already do that when parents are physically, sexually or mentally abusive,

Your world class idiot mind is showing

Xavier_Onassis » 05 May 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 4:58 pm

Laura Ingraham is 'following me'........(& 10,000 others).
Yes, I am flattered
OK.
Let's move on.                   
Please..........can we at least jail the dirty ***.??

Ohhhhhh.......I am sorry............was that 'politically incorrect'......  

No, it's not legal, you dumb ****.
Read, but first know the difference between lawfully and unlawfully.

18 U.S. Code § 1201 - Kidnapping

"Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when..."

Did you catch the "unlawfully" part, groomer?

Yer a dunce, boi!   

 
 

              Not quite.....

         https://www.politifact.com/article/2023 ... roposed-l/
          
         No, Florida can’t ‘kidnap’ trans kids under proposed law, but it does affect custody disputes ...  
     
        The bill does not grant the state unilateral power to "kidnap" or take custody of a child receiving gender-affirming care from a family. The Disney World example would not apply. But the bill does change how custody disputes between parents are resolved, especially when another state issued the original custody order.

         In 1997, the Uniform Law Commission, a nonprofit organization working for the uniformity of state laws, drafted the Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. The act adopted in every state except Massachusetts, outlines how different states determine who is authorized to make a custody decision for a child. 

                By assigning every child involved in a custody order a "home state," the act aims to prevent having competing custody orders from different states. Home states are typically where the parents divorced or the first custody order was issued. That "home state" remains in charge of that case unless another home state is legally established. Generally, if parents want to modify custody orders, they must do so in the child’s home state. The existing law has a caveat to account for extreme circumstances. In instances of abandonment, mistreatment or abuse, current law says a state other than a child’s home state can claim "temporary emergency jurisdiction," giving it short-term authority to make custody decisions.
        S.B. 254 adds one more exception to the list: A state can take emergency jurisdiction when a child has been "subjected to or is threatened with being subjected to," gender-affirming health care in the form of puberty blockers, hormones and in some rare cases, surgeries.