It doesn't fit their narrative...Beekeeper » 07 May 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Putting Meth in her body was HER CHOICE. So what is the difference if TAKING A LIFE by ABORTION isn't murder, then how can killing the BABY WITH METH be murder??
That is your brain we are talking about!Beekeeper » 07 May 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Is that what it becomes IF the mother does METH and the baby dies??? WHODA thunk it.
It also destroys their entire "liberal logic" of "my body, my choice" mantra as well.
that's the gist of the OP.
Just you. You only refer a character's mind as a we conversation.nuckin futz » 07 May 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ That is your brain we are talking about!
A mass of useless dead tissue! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Obviously that goes straight over the LWNJs head, especially @Xavier_Onassis and the REST of the filthy NAZIS.sunburn » 08 May 2023, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ that's the gist of the OP.
if the fetus is less sacred, why a double homicide when a man does it?
A lot of things destroy the "my body, my choice" liberal logic. Like doing brain surgery on a person through the abdomen.Beekeeper » 08 May 2023, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ It also destroys their entire "liberal logic" of "my body, my choice" mantra as well.
HOW DARE THEY save a babies life from misery and death!!!ConsRule » 08 May 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ A lot of things destroy the "my body, my choice" liberal logic. Like doing brain surgery on a person through the abdomen.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/health/b ... index.html
People only get to control their bodies when liberals agree with what the person wants to do with their body.
but here's the deal, they gleefully turn a blind eye if it's the same yet doesn't fit their narrative...Beekeeper » 08 May 2023, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ It also destroys their entire "liberal logic" of "my body, my choice" mantra as well.
Better to implode bad ideology than destroy your own species inside out saving bad policies cradle to grave each generation using them constantly.ROG62 » 08 May 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ but here's the deal, they gleefully turn a blind eye if it's the same yet doesn't fit their narrative...
Xavier_Onassis » 07 May 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The only reason for such charges is that Republican legislators chose to pass a law making this a double offense.
If I say that a horse has five legs, how many legs does a horse actually have?
If a state legislature votes to claim that all horses in the state will have five legs, how many legs will a horse have?
If a pregnant woman is charged with taking drugs and killing a fetus, then a jury will decide-- bit only if the court accepts this frivolous charge as valid.
I do not need to offer any opinion unless I am on a jury. That is how we decide things like this in this country. I am not asking anyone anything.Vegas » 08 May 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ XO always finding a way to never answer a question himself. Throws it on someone else to answer. He isn't asking the jury, he is asking you lefties. Answer wit your opinion you pedo.
And the coward slithers out of it again.Xavier_Onassis » 08 May 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ I do not need to offer any opinion unless I am on a jury.
Don't offer opinions over social consensus, explain what you understand about living here one of a kind as specifically as you have since replacing your previous 4 generation gaps.Xavier_Onassis » 08 May 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ I do not need to offer any opinion unless I am on a jury. That is how we decide things like this in this country. I am not asking anyone anything.
The law that claims killing a pregnant woman is a double homicide is a bogus one, passed as I said, to pander to voters. Every criminal trial deals with individuals that have different personalities, degrees of mental acuity and motives. These things are presented in a trial and decided on by a jury.
How am I or anyone obligated to provide you with an opinion on demand?
And another evasion. This is the third one. **** you, pedo.Xavier_Onassis » 08 May 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ How am I or anyone obligated to provide you with an opinion on demand?
Only if the mother doesn't die too. But, if the mom dies, then its called a "Natural Cleansing".Beekeeper » 07 May 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ Seems that it's HER BODY and she can do with it WHATEVER she wants, right??
You know, like the ABORTION of her BABY isn't murder, so why is DOING METH AND THE BABY DYING ALSO NOT MURDER?? It's STILL HER BODY, HER CHOICE, right??
GO, LEFTIES, we would LOVE to hear your discussion on this!! Seems ONE of your NASTY ILK has discovered what they believe is PURE GARBAGE!!
https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/ ... rtion.html
I seek your opinion.Skans » 08 May 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Only if the mother doesn't die too. But, if the mom dies, then its called a "Natural Cleansing".
Rational minds using rationed interpretations creating secrets on the need to know basis chain of command from obedient people to ranked leaderships, to those in charge of defining what is possible tomorrow, except evolving doesn't exceed being alive now..Skans » 08 May 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Only if the mother doesn't die too. But, if the mom dies, then its called a "Natural Cleansing".
You hit upon my Achilles heel - one of the few areas of firearms that I do not know much about - pump action shotguns. I have shot them on occasion, but never owned one and have never thoroughly researched any of them. I tend to prefer O/U's for sporting shotguns, and semi-auto for 2-legged critters. I wish I could give you an honest opinion about the 590, but I can't.Taipan » 08 May 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ I seek your opinion.
Mossberg 590.
I have not shot it.
I have fired the Mossberg 500.
It will blow the guts out of anything walking or breathing.
https://youtu.be/TxmXi2oI1qA