Nice try....
The gender of the person is not the issue here. The issue is whether his person physically exists regardless of gender compared to "God", who either does not exist or who has chosen to make himself imperceptible with any of the five senses that he ostensibly gave us.Majik » 07 May 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice try....
but if this mental case above were to be put in a line-up of 12 naked men without it's fakery.....could you pick which one is the Tranny ???
Huh ?
try answering that question honestly .....
Yes, the male physically exists and can't be changed by any amount of wigs and make-up because wigs and make-up are pure fakery.....Xavier_Onassis » 07 May 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The gender of the person is not the issue here. The issue is whether his person physically exists regardless of gender compared to "God", who either does not exist or who has chosen to make himself imperceptible with any of the five senses that he ostensibly gave us.
Will someone tell these CLOWNS- They need a make- up lesson?Xavier_Onassis » 07 May 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The gender of the person is not the issue here. The issue is whether his person physically exists regardless of gender compared to "God", who either does not exist or who has chosen to make himself imperceptible with any of the five senses that he ostensibly gave us.
Please seek help for your urges....Xavier_Onassis » 07 May 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The gender of the person is not the issue here. The issue is whether his person physically exists regardless of gender compared to "God", who either does not exist or who has chosen to make himself imperceptible with any of the five senses that he ostensibly gave us.

Its trueXavier_Onassis » 07 May 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Often my posts make less sense
than those from Nastradumass