so … **** over the old and needy would be a “good start to getting our government in a better place “ ?Skans » 08 May 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ The Republican House of Representatives is strong and Joe Biden is Weak. It's time to shut the government down and make the Democrats feel some real pain. Either they cut spending, and do it drastically, or we shut everything down. But, this time I want things to be different:That will be a good start to getting our government in a better place. If they can't make this happen, keep it shut down for the next 2 years.
- Furlough government employees so they do not need to receive back pay for the time they didn't work.
- Don't bluff, give those Democrats the pain they've been begging for and make it last
- Cut the military budgets - they waste tons of money
- Eliminate each and every unnecessary government program
- Cut Medicare 25%
- Eliminate Medicaid
- Eliminate Food Stamps and any "free food" program
- Eliminate free phones
- Eliminate free housing.
How about Congress doing what we must to PAY OUR FREAKING BILLS. I said cut the military 50%. Did you see that? Is the military "old people"? Is the military "needy people"? Then, cut the other bloated government programs as well.
I dislike you more.
I'd start by taking your free Medicare and Social Security away first - just from you. Then, I'd make a youtube channel featuring you starving to death because you can't live unless you are sponging off of others. If it makes money, I will give you a percentage so that you can survive and make me some more money.
oh gee, you included the military and tried to make it sound like I said that cutting it would hurt the needySkans » 08 May 2023, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ How about Congress doing what we must to PAY OUR FREAKING BILLS. I said cut the military 50%. Did you see that? Is the military "old people"? Is the military "needy people"? Then, cut the other bloated government programs as well.
Our revenue is not limitless. But, YOUR **** Democrats spend like it is. End it. NOW!!! Because we can and will shut your **** government down.
Oh yeah, I sure as **** included your "FREE STUFF" programs. I'd cut the **** out of them. And, the Military.Mrkelly » 08 May 2023, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ you said cut Medicare and food stamps and any other give away to people in need
LOL, I'm talking about shrinking government by 50%, and you falsely label me as wanting "big government". Meanwhile, you are pissed that I say it loud and proud that I'd cut your free-**** programs. YOU, i.e. DEMOCRATS just like you accuse people like me of what YOU are guilty of. YOU are the one championing big, socialist, nasty communist government. YOU. Democrats. Again, (because you are dense), YOU.
dont be a ****** … say it loud and proud … you want big government
Yes, I am for the kind of government I want. A responsible government. A government that spends what it collects in revenue. A government that does not squander other people's hard earned money. A government that prides itself on efficiency and no waste. A government where people are still required to do what they must on their own to pursue life liberty and happiness, without burdening others to do it for them.as long as it is the kind of government that you want
The truly needy shouldn't be the target of our economic "salvation".Mrkelly » 08 May 2023, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ so … **** over the old and needy would be a “good start to getting our government in a better place “ ?
good to see where your priorities are
you seem unhinged...too many light beers last night?Skans » 08 May 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ Oh yeah, I sure as **** included your "FREE STUFF" programs. I'd cut the **** out of them. And, the Military.
LOL, I'm talking about shrinking government by 50%, and you falsely label me as wanting "big government". Meanwhile, you are pissed that I say it loud and proud that I'd cut your free-**** programs. YOU, i.e. DEMOCRATS just like you accuse people like me of what YOU are guilty of. YOU are the one championing big, socialist, nasty communist government. YOU. Democrats. Again, (because you are dense), YOU.
Yes, I am for the kind of government I want. A responsible government. A government that spends what it collects in revenue. A government that does not squander other people's hard earned money. A government that prides itself on efficiency and no waste. A government where people are still required to do what they must on their own to pursue life liberty and happiness, without burdening others to do it for them.
good luck with that...as long as libtards exist, methinks it's more likely I could spit landing it on the moon than for that to ever happen...even if a stool was supplied...Skans » 08 May 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑A government that does not squander other people's hard earned money. A government that prides itself on efficiency and no waste.
I did have a few Yuengling Lights out on the boat yesterday. But, when it comes to Retard Joe and our worthless Democrat-Spendy government, I do get "unhinged", as well I should.
Skans » 08 May 2023, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Here's the deal. I will be sending messages to Republicans in the House of Representatives that WE, THE PEOPLE (particularly me) are fed up with Republicans bluffing and then caving to the Obese Bloated Spendy Democrats. It's time to shut it down, and shut it down with permanent consequences. Furlough government workers and don't pay them back wages. SHUT THIS BAD-BITCH DOWN AND DO IT FOR 2 YEARS.

****, you're lucky you don't live in MN...the trifecta democrats are having their way with us that could only bring a smile to an 80yo well worn hooker...Skans » 08 May 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ I did have a few Yuengling Lights out on the boat yesterday. But, when it comes to Retard Joe and our worthless Democrat-Spendy government, I do get "unhinged", as well I should.
Prince started it. Somalians cemented it. Amy the **** is just a beaut.ROG62 » 08 May 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ ****, you're lucky you don't live in MN...the trifecta democrats are having their way with us that could only bring a smile to an 80yo well worn hooker...
I can only imagine what that bottomless cave looks like.ROG62 » 08 May 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ ****, you're lucky you don't live in MN...the trifecta democrats are having their way with us that could only bring a smile to an 80yo well worn hooker...
Could be an interesting book. I don't know if it is about actual term limits or a title with some alternate meaning. In regards to term limits, I would be for something like a 15 year term limit, but not 2, 4 or 8. And, here's why. When you have everyone term limited, then the non-elected Bureaucracy wins. These appointees and hires have the run of the show with little interference from elected officials.