you did say that. your statement is verbatim....golfboy » 15 May 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said "all senators present and voting".
You were wrong on that fact, not me. And you're still my bitch.
you even re-owned it here.
Nope. You're the moron that added that verbiage after your ignorance was exposed.
and you said right here that the statement was 100% correctgolfboy » 15 May 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. You're the moron that added that verbiage after your ignorance was exposed.
right here.
Poor mainbitch. Still confused by how the Senate works.
did you or did you not say that "YES *******. FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE US SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING" was 100% correct?
because I think that you did exactly that right here.
You added the "all senators are present and voting", not me.maineman » 15 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ did you or did you not say that "YES *******. FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE US SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING" was 100% correct?
did you say the statement was 100% correct? yes or no?golfboy » 15 May 2023, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You added the "all senators are present and voting", not me.
Just stop. You're never going to change history.
because right here... it sure seems like that is exactly what you said.
Why do you keep trying to rewrite history, because it's embarrassing for you?maineman » 15 May 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ because right here... it sure seems like that is exactly what you said.
did you or did you not say...TONIGHT..."that statement is 100% correct"?golfboy » 15 May 2023, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you keep trying to rewrite history, because it's embarrassing for you?
You added the "with all senators present and voting" not me.maineman » 15 May 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ did you or did you not say...TONIGHT..."that statement is 100% correct"?
did you or did you not say that the statement was 100% correct?golfboy » 15 May 2023, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You added the "with all senators present and voting" not me.
It must really suck to be you, old man.
he is an embarrassment to those that served.golfboy » 15 May 2023, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you keep trying to rewrite history, because it's embarrassing for you?
WTF is the matter with you?maineman » 15 May 2023, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ did you or did you not say that the statement was 100% correct?
that statement you are referring to is THOSE WERE YOUR WORDS. "YES *******. FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING" QUOTE AND **** UNQUOTE
Your words, not mine. Just stop lying.maineman » 15 May 2023, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ that statement you are referring to is THOSE WERE YOUR WORDS. "YES *******. FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING" QUOTE AND **** UNQUOTE