LIAR POS!! As you ALWAYS DO!! ONLY THE ONE LEAST SERIOUS they found "not guilty"
Its FAR from over, PEDOPHILE GROOMER!!They deadlocked, however, on the most serious charges against Gillum, Florida's Democratic nominee for governor in 2018, and his co-defendant, Sharon Lettman-Hicks, involving the misuse of campaign funds.
The 12-person jury, which rendered its decision Thursday after five days of deliberations and behind-the-scenes drama, was unable to reach consensus on one count of conspiracy and 17 counts of wire fraud against both defendants. U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor declared a mistrial on those counts.
[...]
Assistant U.S. Attorney Gary Milligan II said the government will retry Gillum and Lettman-Hicks on the conspiracy and wire fraud charges. Outside the courthouse later, defense attorneys urged the government to reconsider.
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/ ... 161984007/
roadkill » 09 May 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Not to mention the lady that admitted she lied about Kavanaugh. The lie is half way around the world before the truth gets its pants on.
It takes time...but the truth eventually comes out.
From what I've read it's a case of he said she said, and of course a jury pooled out of Manhattan will side against Trump regardless.DeplorablePatriot » 09 May 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Clara always asked where the beef was. The jury should have asked the same thing. WHERE'S THE BEEF?
There wasn't any. And denying that you aren't guilty of something is NOT slander.
The Democrat SS hard at work.
You mentioned the operative word. Manhattan. Trail by fire or water.RedheadedStranger » 09 May 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ From what I've read it's a case of he said she said, and of course a jury pooled out of Manhattan will side against Trump regardless.
The had a picture of Trump meeting Carroll and her husband at what looks like a party back in 1987, and two of Carroll's friends saying she told them it happened 30 years ago.
That's was their case in a nutshell.
Trump's attorneys have already stated that the ruling will be appealed, as it should be.
HER WORD AGAINST HIS ON AN INCIDENT THAT SHE CAN'T RECALL WHAT DAY IN WHAT MONTH IT HAPPENED, SOME 30 YEARS AGO. THIS IS WHY BIAS JURY CASES SHOULD NEVER GO TO COURT.Z09 » 09 May 2023, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ He touched her?
Here's the problem...
It happened decades ago..
Exactly.righteous » 09 May 2023, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ HER WORD AGAINST HIS ON AN INCIDENT THAT SHE CAN'T RECALL WHAT DAY IN WHAT MONTH IT HAPPENED, SOME 30 YEARS AGO. THIS IS WHY BIAS JURY CASES SHOULD NEVER GO TO COURT.
IN ADDITION NEW YORK AND CALIFORNIA ARE THE ONLY TWO STATES WHERE YOU CAN REVITALIZE AN ACCUSATION AT ANY TIME. NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
TOTAL LEFTIST NONSENSE
RedheadedStranger » 09 May 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
I couldn't even tell you the first names of half the bitches I **** 30 years ago, and most likely wouldn't know them if I met them today.
As many people as someone like Donald Trump has interacted with over the years, it's completely plausible that he genuinely has no idea who she is.
Right! Like Crimeariver(whom I think is POM) and Smella who are all Russian Disinformationalists!Xavier_Onassis » 09 May 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ What does that have to do with this trial?
There are at least three morons in this Forum that make false accusations against his country and think Russia is great.

I do remember Terri. Tits too big for her body. Burned into my brain.RedheadedStranger » 09 May 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
I couldn't even tell you the first names of half the bitches I **** 30 years ago, and most likely wouldn't know them if I met them today.
As many people as someone like Donald Trump has interacted with over the years, it's completely plausible that he genuinely has no idea who she is.
Oh there are a couple I remember... vividly.Sumela » 09 May 2023, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I do remember Terri. Tits too big for her body. Burned into my brain.
She weighed about 120....and each tit was about 20.
That’s it?
Seems the best in the sack were the crazy ones....
Yeah, with as much $$ as Trump claims to have, he can raw dog any cheap slut he wants to!RedheadedStranger » 09 May 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
I couldn't even tell you the first names of half the bitches I **** 30 years ago, and most likely wouldn't know them if I met them today.
As many people as someone like Donald Trump has interacted with over the years, it's completely plausible that he genuinely has no idea who she is.
You sound jealous.nuckinfutz » 09 May 2023, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, with as much $$ as Trump claims to have, he can raw dog any cheap slut he wants to!
No. I'm picky, I don't do sluts!
DeplorablePatriot » 09 May 2023, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Kavanaugh should have sued the nutty professor for slander, and she should have been jailed for perjury.
Yep..
Big **** deal, moron.Xavier_Onassis » 09 May 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ He was and remains a vile piece of corrupt **** and was the worst president ever.
He LOST this case. He claims that he knew nothing of this woman, and the jury concluded that he was LYING.