Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Trump found guilty of rape and slander
Trump found guilty of rape and slander
By Warcok
9 May 2023 2:34 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 May 2023 8:44 am
Notice how they won't release Epstein's client list. Likely loaded with leftists. I think Bill Clinton was on the flight log around 27 times.neueregel » 10 May 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Trump said she’s too ugly to sexually assault. That’s a pretty solid defense.
10 May 2023 9:19 am
Lower in the US than in other countries. Inflation was caused by Covid, which was mismanaged horribly by Trump.Z09 » 09 May 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I know things were much better with Trump....
Check inflation lately?
First comes the cause (bailing everyone out for months) then comes the effect (inflation). If you cannot understand this, then you are a dolt..
But in your case also an annoying and worthless troll.
10 May 2023 9:29 am
rape? You sure bout that?
10 May 2023 9:30 am
if you hate trump after the last 28 months your commitment to stupidity is impressiveXavier_Onassis » 10 May 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Lower in the US than in other countries. Inflation was caused by Covid, which was mismanaged horribly by Trump.
First comes the cause (bailing everyone out for months) then comes the effect (inflation). If you cannot understand this, then you are a dolt..
But in your case also an annoying and worthless troll.
10 May 2023 10:36 am
there is something to say about nice titties sloshing about...and then there's motorboating...
10 May 2023 12:08 pm
Look in the mirror, does your *** look like a hole in the ground?Xavier_Onassis » 10 May 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Lower in the US than in other countries. Inflation was caused by Covid, which was mismanaged horribly by Trump.
First comes the cause (bailing everyone out for months) then comes the effect (inflation). If you cannot understand this, then you are a dolt..
But in your case also an annoying and worthless troll.
10 May 2023 12:57 pm
Dr Sebastian Gorka has an interesting perspective on the sham rape case of Trump.
So Trump didn't rape Carroll, but he defamed her by not raping her??
The multiple peculiarities of the E. Jean Carroll verdict add up to the most bizarre case in modern legal history. Someone's lying.
SEBASTIAN GORKA
MAY 10, 2023
E. Jean Carroll in 2006
The Allegation
Almost thirty years ago, the future 45th President raped E. Jean Carroll at the high-end Bergdorf Goodman department store. Then Donald Trump denied it and thus “defamed” the alleged victim. Yesterday, in a civil suit brought in Manhattan the jury found that Donald Trump did not in fact rape Carroll, but had sexually abused and defamed her name and thus awarded her almost $5 million in damages. A strange decision and a strange case. Here's why.
The Timing
Carroll revealed her story about the department store incident in an article she wrote for New York Magazine in the Summer of 2019, the rape having allegedly occurred decades earlier in 1995 or 1996. She couldn't remember in which year.
Given the amount of time that had passed, the statute of limitations had long since expired. That is, until a very peculiar thing occurred.
Thanks to Kathy Hochul, the Governor of New York, a very unusual law was brought in the Empire State.
Last year, Hochul signed the Adult Survivor’s Act into law. Well temporarily. The change to New York’s code allows alleged victims of sexual offenses, such as sexual assault and unwanted sexual contact in the workplace, to file civil suits between November 24, 2022, and November 24, 2023 this year. You read that right. This transitory super law magically voids the statute of limitations for these crimes, but just for 12 months? Strange no?
Remember Governor Hochul is an avid Trump-hater, who detests all Republicans and prefer they leave “her state.”
Why did Carroll wait almost 30 years? And what is the quality of “justice” provided from a trial that would have been impossible to bring in 2021, and will be impossible top bring in 2024? Surely all victims matter. Or perhaps some matter more than others. Depending on who they target with their accusations?
The Victim
E. Jean Carroll is a strange figure by even Manhattan’s outré standards. Beyond her inability to even know the year if her alleged rape, and waiting decades to take any action at all, she has rather strange views about men in general, and young boys in particular, as well believing people think rape is “sexy.”
I suggest you watch her public statements and make your own judgment. Her interview with Anderson Cooper is especially worth your time. You decide.
The Backer
You may have read that the Manhattan DA that brought the recent charges against President Trump was funded to the tune of a million dollars by Trump-hater George Soros. Surely there’s nothing like that involved with this civil case? Wrong. Even the left-wing gutter Press couldn't hide the fact that the billionaire LinkedIn founder, and Trump-hater Reid Hoffman, has been secretly funding E. Jean Carroll suit against Donald Trump.
So Trump didn't rape Carroll, but he defamed her by not raping her??
The multiple peculiarities of the E. Jean Carroll verdict add up to the most bizarre case in modern legal history. Someone's lying.
SEBASTIAN GORKA
MAY 10, 2023
E. Jean Carroll in 2006
The Allegation
Almost thirty years ago, the future 45th President raped E. Jean Carroll at the high-end Bergdorf Goodman department store. Then Donald Trump denied it and thus “defamed” the alleged victim. Yesterday, in a civil suit brought in Manhattan the jury found that Donald Trump did not in fact rape Carroll, but had sexually abused and defamed her name and thus awarded her almost $5 million in damages. A strange decision and a strange case. Here's why.
The Timing
Carroll revealed her story about the department store incident in an article she wrote for New York Magazine in the Summer of 2019, the rape having allegedly occurred decades earlier in 1995 or 1996. She couldn't remember in which year.
Given the amount of time that had passed, the statute of limitations had long since expired. That is, until a very peculiar thing occurred.
Thanks to Kathy Hochul, the Governor of New York, a very unusual law was brought in the Empire State.
Last year, Hochul signed the Adult Survivor’s Act into law. Well temporarily. The change to New York’s code allows alleged victims of sexual offenses, such as sexual assault and unwanted sexual contact in the workplace, to file civil suits between November 24, 2022, and November 24, 2023 this year. You read that right. This transitory super law magically voids the statute of limitations for these crimes, but just for 12 months? Strange no?
Remember Governor Hochul is an avid Trump-hater, who detests all Republicans and prefer they leave “her state.”
Why did Carroll wait almost 30 years? And what is the quality of “justice” provided from a trial that would have been impossible to bring in 2021, and will be impossible top bring in 2024? Surely all victims matter. Or perhaps some matter more than others. Depending on who they target with their accusations?
The Victim
E. Jean Carroll is a strange figure by even Manhattan’s outré standards. Beyond her inability to even know the year if her alleged rape, and waiting decades to take any action at all, she has rather strange views about men in general, and young boys in particular, as well believing people think rape is “sexy.”
I suggest you watch her public statements and make your own judgment. Her interview with Anderson Cooper is especially worth your time. You decide.
The Backer
You may have read that the Manhattan DA that brought the recent charges against President Trump was funded to the tune of a million dollars by Trump-hater George Soros. Surely there’s nothing like that involved with this civil case? Wrong. Even the left-wing gutter Press couldn't hide the fact that the billionaire LinkedIn founder, and Trump-hater Reid Hoffman, has been secretly funding E. Jean Carroll suit against Donald Trump.
10 May 2023 12:58 pm
The Verdict
After only 3 hours the jury of nine (6 men, 3 women) brought their verdict. And a strange verdict it was.
Carroll was there to prove, by a “preponderance of evidence,” which is the significantly lower standard a civl action prescribes (as opposed to the “beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal case), that President Trump had raped her and then defamed her by denying said rape.
Well the jury decided that Donald Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll on that day in 1995. Or 1996. He was found not guilty of rape, a headline you will not find in the legacy media. However, they did find that the accused had sexually assaulted Carroll. Let that sink in. The jury didn’t believe Carroll’s story about being raped by Donald Trump. But instead believed her about sexual assault. Does that mean she was deemed too have lied about her original story published in New York Magazine? More than peculiar.
Then the jury found that President Trump’s denying he had raped Carroll had done damage to her reputation and awarded her close to $5 million in compensatory damages. In other words, the jury is forcing Trump to pay Carroll millions of dollars because he said he didn’t rape her, despite the fact they they don’t believe her story that he did rape her.
This counts as justice in 2023.
After only 3 hours the jury of nine (6 men, 3 women) brought their verdict. And a strange verdict it was.
Carroll was there to prove, by a “preponderance of evidence,” which is the significantly lower standard a civl action prescribes (as opposed to the “beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal case), that President Trump had raped her and then defamed her by denying said rape.
Well the jury decided that Donald Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll on that day in 1995. Or 1996. He was found not guilty of rape, a headline you will not find in the legacy media. However, they did find that the accused had sexually assaulted Carroll. Let that sink in. The jury didn’t believe Carroll’s story about being raped by Donald Trump. But instead believed her about sexual assault. Does that mean she was deemed too have lied about her original story published in New York Magazine? More than peculiar.
Then the jury found that President Trump’s denying he had raped Carroll had done damage to her reputation and awarded her close to $5 million in compensatory damages. In other words, the jury is forcing Trump to pay Carroll millions of dollars because he said he didn’t rape her, despite the fact they they don’t believe her story that he did rape her.
This counts as justice in 2023.
10 May 2023 1:13 pm
explain to me .... why she was in a dressing room with a man. lolXavier_Onassis » 09 May 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You do not know how the dressing rooms were managed in this store.
I cannot recall of dressing rooms being monitored in most stores.
Trump just walked in and apparently grabbed her ******. He admitted that was what he did, and spoke of it as though it was his privilege to do this.
10 May 2023 1:18 pm
One has to lie to oneself to be a Leftist…..roadkill » 10 May 2023, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ It will be appealed. I notice you leftists have no concern for the women Biden and Clinton sexually abused.
10 May 2023 1:18 pm
So... Trump admitted to grabbing Carroll by the ******?Xavier_Onassis » 09 May 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You do not know how the dressing rooms were managed in this store.
I cannot recall of dressing rooms being monitored in most stores.
Trump just walked in and apparently grabbed her ******. He admitted that was what he did, and spoke of it as though it was his privilege to do this.
Why do you constantly lie like that?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
10 May 2023 1:24 pm
Why am I not surprised at this...Buffalo » 10 May 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The Verdict
After only 3 hours the jury of nine (6 men, 3 women) brought their verdict. And a strange verdict it was.
Carroll was there to prove, by a “preponderance of evidence,” which is the significantly lower standard a civl action prescribes (as opposed to the “beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal case), that President Trump had raped her and then defamed her by denying said rape.
Well the jury decided that Donald Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll on that day in 1995. Or 1996. He was found not guilty of rape, a headline you will not find in the legacy media. However, they did find that the accused had sexually assaulted Carroll. Let that sink in. The jury didn’t believe Carroll’s story about being raped by Donald Trump. But instead believed her about sexual assault. Does that mean she was deemed too have lied about her original story published in New York Magazine? More than peculiar.
Then the jury found that President Trump’s denying he had raped Carroll had done damage to her reputation and awarded her close to $5 million in compensatory damages. In other words, the jury is forcing Trump to pay Carroll millions of dollars because he said he didn’t rape her, despite the fact they they don’t believe her story that he did rape her.
This counts as justice in 2023.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
10 May 2023 1:28 pm
What about the gov of New York temporarily changing the law on the statutes of limitations to allow this to happen?
Goddamn if the sheople cannot see that this is all a big conspiracy to "get Trump" and attempt to prevent him from running in 2024 then they do not deserve to vote!!! The dim-0-craps are scared to death of Trump!!!
10 May 2023 2:08 pm
And wear blinders.
10 May 2023 2:53 pm
. In other words, the jury is forcing Trump to pay Carroll millions of dollars because he said he didn’t rape her, despite the fact they they don’t believe her story that he did rape her.
No, it means that the jury concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Trump DID force himself on Carrol, but not sufficient evidence that what happened could be conclusively called a rape. Plus, it also concluded that Trump denying what obviously happened and was obviously a typical modus operandi for Trump, who bragged that he forced himself on women and grabbed their pussies, was libelous and damaged her career sufficiently for Trump to pay her $5,000,000.
This was NOT a win for Trump, anything but.
No, it means that the jury concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Trump DID force himself on Carrol, but not sufficient evidence that what happened could be conclusively called a rape. Plus, it also concluded that Trump denying what obviously happened and was obviously a typical modus operandi for Trump, who bragged that he forced himself on women and grabbed their pussies, was libelous and damaged her career sufficiently for Trump to pay her $5,000,000.
This was NOT a win for Trump, anything but.
10 May 2023 2:59 pm
In other words, if someone levels an accusation against you, and you call them a liar, then they can sue you for defamation for calling them a liar...Xavier_Onassis » 10 May 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ . In other words, the jury is forcing Trump to pay Carroll millions of dollars because he said he didn’t rape her, despite the fact they they don’t believe her story that he did rape her.
No, it means that the jury concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Trump DID force himself on Carrol, but not sufficient evidence that what happened could be conclusively called a rape. Plus, it also concluded that Trump denying what obviously happened and was obviously a typical modus operandi for Trump, who bragged that he forced himself on women and grabbed their pussies, was libelous and damaged her career sufficiently for Trump to pay her $5,000,000.
This was NOT a win for Trump, anything but.
Sounds legit.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
10 May 2023 3:39 pm
I know right?sootedupCyndi » 10 May 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ explain to me .... why she was in a dressing room with a man. lol
as usual, the slut was asking for it
can I get an Amen?
10 May 2023 3:40 pm
You motorboatin son of a bitch you old sailor you! what were they like? Are they real? Are they built for speed or comfort? What’d you do with them?ROG62 » 10 May 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑
10 May 2023 3:52 pm
I don't know? seems stinky to me..... sheet yea.Mrkelly » 10 May 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I know right?
as usual, the slut was asking for it
can I get an Amen?
A ton of the crazy chicks make stuff up... Can you judge? What's the truth.. how can any chick go back that many years? I try to look at this stuff fairly..
if i didn't have the balls to speak up so long ago? why would I NOW!It's all political.
10 May 2023 3:59 pm
prollysootedupCyndi » 10 May 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know? seems stinky to me..... sheet yea.
A ton of the crazy chicks make stuff up... Can you judge? What's the truth.. how can any chick go back that many years? I try to look at this stuff fairly..
It's all political.
but you didnt say that
Who is online
In total there are 20238 users online :: 9 registered, 15 bots, and 20214 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, michaelf, LowIQTrash, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: okhttp, MicroMessenger, aiohttp, Bolt, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Googlebot, CriteoBot, curl/7, YandexBot, proximic, bingbot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google