Fruity, you think SPEECH is violence, when someone offers an idea that confutes your narratives.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ The most you got is threatening. Lemme know when you have actual violence.
What role does his sexual orientation play, fruitcake?
The overwheming testimony of the riders is that he continued to struggle and flail. His VICTIMS had no duty to possess precise informtion about the exact moment when a release of the flailing, dangerous felon was at hand, you dick loving scat-dabbler.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ came up behind Neely. A chokehold might have been warranted but he should have ended it when Neely went limp not continue unfitting off his circulation. I posted a witness telling Penny to ease up or face a murder charge.
Penny was never in danger, he has the upper hand the whole time.Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ But to show you their satanic nature, they go after the fellow who put his own safety on the line to prevent this robber - whose armaments he had to GUESS at, the state of his arms being known only AFTER he was subdued, - from fulfilling on his promise to hurt people if he was not given free money by the hard working people riding that train.
Imagine living in the most expensive city on earth after tel aviv, paris, singapore, zurich and hong kong. You are by necessity a passenger on a daily commute, and every day offers the possibility of violence. On this day, you are informed that violence WILL BE DONE TO YOU, unless you or some other worker on the train cough up some money (euphemism used: "food," which you are not carrying on your person). You have a young man with the courage to brace and disable the robber - lucky you. A couple of other commuters are emboldened to help subdue the career criminal, who flails and resists throughout.
In the end, the criminal dies - an outcome that no reasonable person would attribute to the intentions of the passengers who subdued him. They were going to work - not looking for someone to murder. The criminal forced the action. And then the lynch mob is activated - instructed to turn their vitriol and violence against the hard working commuters who defended themselves from threats of murder.
This **** is going down in a blue sewer - their bloodlust just might result in a successful lynching this time.
They struck out with zimmerman. They struck out with rittenhouse. Their bloodlust remaines. It demands to be fed - just like the career criminal demanded to be fed. Welcome to the end of empire - this is what failure and societal collapse looks like.
Under new york law, his words were violence.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the investigation took longer than a few hours. Plus, video was released if Neely being subdued bcuz of his words only. He had not committed any violence.
The thug was not "murdered," ******.
So you admit the thug was serious when he threatened harm to workers riding that train to support their familes, you degraded child danger.Pastafarian » 16 May 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans have become indifferent to violence and will become so at the drop of a hat.
I do not think speech is violence though speech can promote violence.Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Fruity, you think SPEECH is violence, when someone offers an idea that confutes your narratives.
Actual PROMISES of violence? Not so much, if it's a ****-skin making the promises.
The law disagrees, piece of human waste:
The threats uttered by your doppelganger "conveyed a clear and unambiguous message that the recipient could not help but understand as a threat of future violence" - the standard in new york according to case law.
By the standard, his speech WAS violence under the law, ******.
What role does his sexual orientation play, fruitcake?
The overwheming testimony of the riders is that he continued to struggle and flail. His VICTIMS had no duty to possess precise informtion about the exact moment when a release of the flailing, dangerous felon was at hand, you dick loving scat-dabbler.
1. He did not ask - he demanded. On threat of extreme violence.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ Jordan Neely never murdered anyone.
He wanted a meal and was executed for asking for food.
I am talking about how people so easily cheer this death when Neely did not have to die.Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ So you admit the thug was serious when he threatened harm to workers riding that train to support their familes, you degraded child danger.
Black people were involved in subduing him, fruity. Your race card fails - as usual, nig.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not think speech is violence though speech can promote violence.
Yes, and he was subdued for threatening violence. Killing him was just the icing on the cake, am I right? Bcuz he is Black, doesn’t matter that he has mental health issues, Black is the trump card.
Prove it, fruitcake.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ He flailed until he went limp and Penny did not ease up and kept cutting off his circulation. Even a witness told him to ease up or face a murder charge.
I love it when a plan comes together stupid.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Penny was never in danger, he has the upper hand the whole time.
Good luck with that, lynch-breath. You're 0 for 2 right now with zimmerman and rittenhouse. Maybe trying your lynch law in a blue **** hole will work better - time will tell.
Hunger combined with mental illness will make anyone desperate.Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. He did not ask - he demanded. On threat of extreme violence.
2. None of the commuters he threatened were actively sporting a food tray, *** - he was demanding MONEY.
3. Jordan Neely never WILL murder anyone, now. You're welcome, scumbag.
You should be wishing Penny good luck. He’s the one who’s charged with manslaughter.
Oh, I know, fruitcake.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I am talking about how people so easily cheer this death when Neely did not have to die.
That is the indifference I refer to.
So will threats against one's life and safety, ***.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunger combined with mental illness will make anyone desperate.
Go to a soup kitchen.
Let me get out my tiny violin, you piece of ****.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Jordan Neely can never get the chance to heal either.
Oh, I do, fruity. But I'm not as concerned for him as I was for rittenhouse (win) and zimmerman (win). They weren't blue state biden voters getting what they pulled the lever for.Pastafarian » 17 May 2023, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ You should be wishing Penny good luck. He’s the one who’s charged with manslaughter.
Cite the law, please.Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Under new york law, his words were violence.
Live with it, ******.
No.
That’s bcuz you are a stupid ho.Z09 » 17 May 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't seeing anyone cheering his death....
But he's responsible for the chain of events
Or go to a soup kitchen for food - not a passenger car on a subway. He wasn't after food.
Dumb Nigism led to Dead Nigism. Simple factsPastafarian » 17 May 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That’s bcuz you are a stupid ho.
America’s mental health crisis along with American insurance care is responsible for this chain of events.