Stopping him from murdering people at the stage where he is only screeching, threatening lives, and throwing refuse is prior restraint, you see. They are overnight libertardians, just as they became overnight climate experts and gender experts and pediatric psychologists.Z09 » 19 May 2023, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ So...
A black woman has come forward and said Neely threatened people....
Tell us..
You can threaten to murder people and until you do there's nothing anyone can do?
Explain to us
He had the right to shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater, you racist. He was BLACK, ya bastid. And from an underserved community.
They'll be calling her Aunt Jemima and house *** in 3,2,1...Z09 » 19 May 2023, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you need to think of her?
Because she was a WITNESS and she says the guy was threatening people...
And she was black too..!
That must suck for you...
Making this ANOTHER left wing lynching attempt. There was Rittenhouse - fail. There was Zimmerman - fail. There was that lawyer couple who stood off a nig crowd and had to cop a midemeanor plea - mostly fail.Kobia2 » 19 May 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. On the day of the incident, he was released without charge after a Police interview and corroborating witness statements determined no crime had been committed... Penny was only arrested 10 days later, when Activist Manhattan D.A. Alvin Grant's office bent to the protesting BLM, Race-Pimp Sharpton, & the Leftist Mob.. Hell, even the NYC Mayor Eric Adams hinted if anyone should have been arrested, it would have been Jordan Neely --- NOT Daniel Penny... The only punishment we may see might be of a monetary nature, levied against the New York Taxpayer in a civil court ---- this goes nowhere in criminal court.
2. BLM & Democrats do not Riot & Loot?.... What the **** kind of clouds orbit your little cranium?
3. You are a 3rd world Mud-Hut professor, spray-painting on the walls of American Academia, while pretending to be a legit being who belongs here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRXTFuzBclY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDZ9Zw6itKg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnru2z7Ljz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH8nhqQbd28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqK60iUXfpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiDdU1W_gA4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua9TtOyuXnc
And you got caught in the crossfire, Scarecrow?Xavier_Onassis » 19 May 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You have never kicked the **** out of anyone, you are a simpleminded asshole who does nothing but hurl ignorant slanders at anyone with a brain.
If he had been an escaped gorilla, that ****** would never have laid a hand on him!Beekeeper » 20 May 2023, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ But, but , but he was a "Michael Jackson impersonator" and that's all that mattered.
FOOD, damn you! He wanted FOOD.Majik » 20 May 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Or he would have coughed up cash like a little ****** boi.....
It's his first amendment right - they are staunch free speech advocates.Z09 » 20 May 2023, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Exactly....
A white supremacist can scream out that he'll be throwing black people in front of moving trains...
....And according to the left there's nothing anyone should do??
Only if it comes from ****, liberal idiots' mouths!!!Cannonpointer » 20 May 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ It's his first amendment right - they are staunch free speech advocates.
Speech is not violence, in their world view, you see...
Subways do not have kitchens or dining cars, fool.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ FOOD, damn you! He wanted FOOD.![]()
![]()
![]()
And the railcar kitchen refused to feed him - or any black person!
SUSTEMUCK RAY CIZZUM!!!
Violence involves actually making physical contact with someone.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ It's his first amendment right - they are staunch free speech advocates.
Speech is not violence, in their world view, you see...
That is all you do in this forum. So if that is what you believe, why do you do it?Z09 » 20 May 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ Stop!
You really think you can ask a liberal a direct question and get a response...???????
You're the fool who thinks the *** just wanted food, moron.
Right. Leave it to YOU to defend that kind of ****, bigot.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ It's his first amendment right - they are staunch free speech advocates.
Speech is not violence, in their world view, you see...
So THAT is why you called riots that featured burning and looting "peaceful."Xavier_Onassis » 20 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Violence involves actually making physical contact with someone.
They were not psychiatrists queer - just hard working commuters trying to survive a robbery by threat of violence. Nor did they know he was unarmed. For all they knew, he had a gun or knife to back his threats if they did not hand over their "food."Xavier_Onassis » 20 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ This guy was crazy and was not provoking others to be violent on his behalf.
He was not executed, lynch mob breath.Xavier_Onassis » 20 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑He was annoying, but he did not harm anyone and did not deserve to be executed.
EXACTLY.Xavier_Onassis » 20 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Violence involves actually making physical contact with someone.
This guy was crazy and was not provoking others to be violent on his behalf.
He was annoying, but he did not harm anyone and did not deserve to be executed.
That seems to be your thesis, sperm bubbler.B.See » 20 May 2023, 11:53 pm » wrote: ↑ A white supremacist can scream out that he'll be throwing black people in front of moving trains...
....And according to the left there's nothing anyone should do??
No questions, COWARD. Go **** yourself.Cannonpointer » 21 May 2023, 12:02 am » wrote: ↑ That seems to be your thesis, sperm bubbler.
Speech is not violence - threats are not violence.
So if a mentally disturbed white supremacist threatens minorites, they have no right to defend themselves. It is their responsibility to know he is mentally disturbed (whatever THAT means to you queers), and it is their responsibility to know that he is unarmed and harmless (even if he isn't, and has forty arrests under his belt).
If they try to detain him, they have to know the precise moment that he is no longer a danger, and let go of the headlock they have him in.
That IS your thesis, is it not, **** breath?
Then January 6 was peaceful, you retard - FAR more peaceful than Kenosha.B.See » 21 May 2023, 12:01 am » wrote: ↑EXACTLY.Xavier_Onassis » 20 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Violence involves actually making physical contact with someone.