It's not about beer.impartialobserver » 15 May 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Why so many get so worked up over what is essentially colored water (Bud Light) is beyond me.
When I drink beer, I care about the taste not the packaging. If it tastes good.. I find a way to purchase it again. If it does not.. well then I quit purchasing. Nowhere in there, did i mention packaging or promotion.
impartialobserver » 15 May 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Why so many get so worked up over what is essentially colored water (Bud Light) is beyond me.
nefarious101 » 15 May 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's the next corporate idiot wiling to be crucified on the Progressive Democrat-Rino Sexual Degeneracy Cross? ***, trans-sexuality, pedophilia, failed education in government schools....the list goes on and on.......all winning ideas....at least in the minds of the idiots, morons and dickheads that support democrats and Rinos
Progressivism is an old outdated scheme that has never and will never work......a cross between Nazism and Communism...the idiot class has been trained to consider themselves "WOKE" as if it's some great personal achievement.
The new Progressive Astroturf science calls their severe mental illness normal....so normal in fact that government schools try to keep their efforts to sexualize kids secret and attack parents for speaking out against what they are doing to their children....government even endorses sexualizing children and legalized pedophilia.
The issue is a company that said go to hell to it's normal customers and pandered to sick, degenerate perverts.impartialobserver » 15 May 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ When I drink beer, I care about the taste not the packaging. If it tastes good.. I find a way to purchase it again. If it does not.. well then I quit purchasing. Nowhere in there, did i mention packaging or promotion.
I would think that if you like drinking Bud light then it would not matter what packaging it comes in... that is my point. Apparently, they really care about the can now.. strange thing to get so worked up about.RebelGator » 15 May 2023, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ The issue is a company that said go to hell to it's normal customers and pandered to sick, degenerate perverts.
Why are you playing stupid, 'cuz I know you aren't.
impartialobserver » 15 May 2023, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I would think that if you like drinking Bud light then it would not matter what packaging it comes in... that is my point. Apparently, they really care about the can now.. strange thing to get so worked up about.
RebelGator » 15 May 2023, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Plenty of prior customers are not drinking Bud Lght and it has nothing to do with the packaging.....they don't like toasting tranny ***.
Can I be any more blunt?
he's trying to pass himself off as an impartial observer but he's not quite smart enough to pull it offRebelGator » 15 May 2023, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Plenty of prior customers are not drinking Bud Lght and it has nothing to do with the packaging.....they don't like toasting tranny ***.
Can I be any more blunt?
I'm not gonna waste any more time with your silly fixation on packaging versus principles....it's clear you'll never understand.impartialobserver » 15 May 2023, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ are you seriously dumb enough to think that the product tastes any different in normal cans versus the cans that had the trans person on them? If so, you are special. Oh and get this.... InBev has more than one brand. Most are the same water down lager that is Bud... so when they switch to Busch, stella artois, beck's, fosters, heineken, natural light, or corona.. they are drinking InBev
I just think it is juvenile on your behalf and those who choose to get so worked up. last factoid... this was a limited edition can and cans only represent 15% of their revenues. Strange how these uptight types could not tell you a single thing about the can before but are suddenly experts. I find it disingenuous to care now but not in the past.RebelGator » 15 May 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not gonna waste any more time with your silly fixation on packaging versus principles....it's clear you'll never understand.
I am sure that you can be even more blunt. The convenient thing about intelligence is that there are limits to human intelligence, while stupidity has no bottom. If you really tried, you might be able to be even dumber than dumbduck. Of course, walkingstick is presently coming close to the bottom layers of witlessness.RebelGator » 15 May 2023, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Plenty of prior customers are not drinking Bud Lght and it has nothing to do with the packaging.....they don't like toasting tranny ***.
Can I be any more blunt?
Confused Observer would be a better description.nefarious101 » 15 May 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ he's trying to pass himself off as an impartial observer but he's not quite smart enough to pull it off