Sumela » 17 May 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Muricans are much more concerned about
tranny surgeries, working 3 jobs, sports, tiktok.
Now you are starting to get it. The information on the phone concerns right now.. not 20 years ago. The present day info gets the top shelf treatment.Vegas » 17 May 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Try challenging them to put their phone down for longer than 5 minutes. Lolo. Good luck.
It matters just as much as Pearl Harbor in reality, because, like Pearl Harbor, the conditions that caused it no longer exist.Vegas » 17 May 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Occupy Wallstreet or any other protest didn't result in thousands of deaths. Which also started years long wars. 9/11 didn't just kill 3k Americans. It brought us into 20 yr long war that accounted for hundreds of thousands in the Middle East. No different as to why we still care about Pearl Harbor. It lead us in WWII. However, 9/11 doesn't seem to matter as much.
I agree, today, and even more tomorrow and the future are more important, because our actions can affect them. hey cannot affect the past.impartialobserver » 17 May 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Now you are starting to get it. The information on the phone concerns right now.. not 20 years ago. The present day info gets the top shelf treatment.
So kooky, I agree 100%. Great post, so smart.impartialobserver » 17 May 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, understood. Still, its been 20 years since this was the lead story in the news. One is going to start de-prioritizing it. I know that it is a hard pill for you to swallow.
As for conspiracy theories.. I do not buy into any of them no matter who puts them out there. It is not a matter of being a liberal or conservative. Maybe it is a flaw.. maybe not but my **** detection meter always is on high. As for why you are met with resistance when you try to convince someone that it was an inside job (conspiracy theory).. it all comes back to folks having deprioritized this story and not wanting to take the time and energy to take a deep dive.
Vegas » 17 May 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Try challenging them to put their phone down for longer than 5 minutes. Lolo. Good luck.
Now thats a weird conspiracy theory. How do we know you even have friends?impartialobserver » 17 May 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ I used to hang out with a guy that was a heavy duty historical re-enactment type. Civil War, revolutionary war, war of 1812. He and his cohort were always lamenting about how Americans no longer care about the civil war except for intellectual interest. They were expecting folks to get emotionally invested and hate one side or the other. Same concept applies... it is in the past and therefore less relevant to our present day pursuits.
Notice how I punked IO. Proved he is a trolling punk.Vegas » 17 May 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Try challenging them to put their phone down for longer than 5 minutes. Lolo. Good luck.
fixed it for ya.Sumela » 17 May 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ So kooky, I agree 100%. Great post, so smart.
So silly to think the govt folks who control billions of dollars and answer to/work with
huge corps and other countries would EVER cover any thing up. Take a bribe and hide it. Lie people into a war.
The very idea that anyone in WASH DC has ever covered any thing up or created an event as deflection of a truth
now thats just all silliness.
![]()
![]()
You are smarter than anyone here.impartialobserver » 17 May 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, understood. Still, its been 20 years since this was the lead story in the news. One is going to start de-prioritizing it. I know that it is a hard pill for you to swallow.
As for conspiracy theories.. I do not buy into any of them no matter who puts them out there. It is not a matter of being a liberal or conservative. Maybe it is a flaw.. maybe not but my **** detection meter always is on high. As for why you are met with resistance when you try to convince someone that it was an inside job (conspiracy theory).. it all comes back to folks having deprioritized this story and not wanting to take the time and energy to take a deep dive.

awww, how sweet of you, thankssootedupCyndi » 17 May 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ fixed it for ya.![]()
if he gives you another reddie- i have plenty of greenies to burn. lol
I think the reasons are two fold.Vegas » 17 May 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ I don't want to be applauded. I just want to know why Americans don't care that their government couldn't care less about killing them. How is that unreasonable?
You mean the slaughter that happened on March 6, 1836...bet your *** we should. But we got payback on April 21, 1836.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ I agree, today, and even more tomorrow and the future are more important, because our actions can affect them. hey cannot affect the past.
Should we remember the Alamo? As much as we remember the Maine? Or the MIAs lost in Vietnam? Remember all you wish.
Quoting someone is difficult for you, isn't it?Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Put in a less flattering way, most people think you're wearing a tin foil hat when it comes to 9/11.
If you think the government planned the 9-11 attack, you are surely a tinfoil hat type.
Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑
If you think the government planned the 9-11 attack, you are surely a tinfoil hat type.
I voted for brainwashed because that's the main cause but the other ones play a part too, not all americans are brainwashed, a lot of them know the official story doesn't make sense and the government is lying, as usual, but they have other more immediate problems to worry about and what should they do about it.. it's like the Kennedy assassination, you know they are lying and the deep state was behind it but you also know the truth will never come out and you can't do anything about it...Vegas » 17 May 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ I never considered all the holes in the government's report about what happened for two reasons:
1. It's the government. Lying is what they do.
2. None of these contradictions have been resolved.
I am beginning to come to a realization that there are no such things as conspiracy theories, there are only theories. Either true or false. Putting a adjective in front of 'theory' is designed to ostracize opposition. There is a small minority of people who seem to give a **** that it is plausible for the attack to be an inside job from our government. The theories hold. They have not been debunked.
Society has been so brainwashed, that they genuinely believe calling people who investigate these attacks 'whacks' or 'nut cases' in itself, is enough to negate the information they present. I hate Americans.

