Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The reason we have an electoral college--shown in one map
The reason we have an electoral college--shown in one map
By Exogenous Ellipsis
17 May 2023 12:32 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 May 2023 12:32 pm
And for your marxists who don't get why the founding founders wanted EC (electoral college).
~ 2/3 of the population lives in ~5% of the geography. If we had a popular vote, then a candidate would only have to campaign in southern Cali, Chicago, the eastern corridor, and a handful of other places. You can skip ID, MT, WY, NV, UT, ND, SD, NE, OK, IA, MO, MS, ME, NH, VT, AK, AR, AZ, NM, UT, WI.
~ 2/3 of the population lives in ~5% of the geography. If we had a popular vote, then a candidate would only have to campaign in southern Cali, Chicago, the eastern corridor, and a handful of other places. You can skip ID, MT, WY, NV, UT, ND, SD, NE, OK, IA, MO, MS, ME, NH, VT, AK, AR, AZ, NM, UT, WI.
17 May 2023 12:58 pm
Why one person one vote destroyed this country serving liberty, honest understanding of evolving, equal justice for equally created ancestors just adapting in space mutually evolving forward now.Lincoln Nebraska » 17 May 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ And for your marxists who don't get why the founding founders wanted EC (electoral college).
~ 2/3 of the population lives in ~5% of the geography. If we had a popular vote, then a candidate would only have to campaign in southern Cali, Chicago, the eastern corridor, and a handful of other places. You can skip ID, MT, WY, NV, UT, ND, SD, NE, OK, IA, MO, MS, ME, NH, VT, AK, AR, AZ, NM, UT, WI.
Social minds destroy each honest brain adapting in their own skin to protect character role playing as rule of law protects typecast people and defends stereotypical behavioral patterns. while punishing anyone discussing the self evident means of evolving here now.
Survival of the fittest is those most capable of adapting to natural catastrophes those with disabilities wouldn't. Life balances outcomes, not fairness in outcomes.
17 May 2023 2:33 pm
Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
17 May 2023 2:42 pm
or context more significance that just the means to communicate brain to brain, ancestor to ancestries coming and going in and out of life limited to only evolving forward here now.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
17 May 2023 2:45 pm
Your kind said the same thing about farm equipment - which is what demoncrats considered blacks.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 May 2023 2:47 pm
Because the STATES elect the President and Vice-President, not the PEOPLE. It would be perfectly legal and Constitutional for the legislatures of the various states to simply appoint the electors of their choosing and give the voters of the state...or their Governor for that matter...no input (other that electing members of that state's legislature).Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
17 May 2023 2:50 pm
Screw the STATES. This is a country of PEOPLE. States are simply jurisdictional entities intended to be made of of people with common interests.
17 May 2023 2:52 pm
Actually, it's a union of States. But that's not the point of this thread, so it sounds like you need to get off you lazy liberal *** and change the Constitution. Good luck with that.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Screw the STATES. This is a country of PEOPLE. States are simply jurisdictional entities intended to be made of of people with common interests.
17 May 2023 2:53 pm
so are nations. so are religions. so does humanity promising things that never actually existed evolving here now.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Screw the STATES. This is a country of PEOPLE. States are simply jurisdictional entities intended to be made of of people with common interests.
common interests? that doesn't sound like economics to me.
17 May 2023 4:11 pm
Retards and loafers shouldn't count.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
17 May 2023 4:27 pm
,Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Screw the STATES. This is a country of PEOPLE. States are simply jurisdictional entities intended to be made of of people with common interests.
,
,
..;
ultraliberals are not happy unless they are obsessing about something.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17 May 2023 5:03 pm
Look at the map....see the blue spots?Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
Those are cesspools where turds live, we can't have **** electing our leaders.....or we get crap like Joe Biden.
17 May 2023 5:23 pm
Without the EC this Country would have folded a long time ago.RebelGator » 17 May 2023, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Look at the map....see the blue spots?
Those are cesspools where turds live, we can't have **** electing our leaders.....or we get crap like Joe Biden.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 May 2023 8:54 pm
Until the utter foolishness of the 17th Amendment, the states were sovereign.ConsRule » 17 May 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Because the STATES elect the President and Vice-President, not the PEOPLE. It would be perfectly legal and Constitutional for the legislatures of the various states to simply appoint the electors of their choosing and give the voters of the state...or their Governor for that matter...no input (other that electing members of that state's legislature).
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 May 2023 8:54 pm
The more local the government, the more democratic, fool.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Screw the STATES. This is a country of PEOPLE. States are simply jurisdictional entities intended to be made of of people with common interests.
States are more local than the feds, fool.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 May 2023 9:08 pm
Big cities run by DEMS are complete ****...Cannonpointer » 17 May 2023, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The more local the government, the more democratic, fool.
States are more local than the feds, fool.
They wish America was the same ****.
However, I doubt any of this can be reversed.
17 May 2023 9:12 pm
Because people live there. The founders balanced urban versus rural.Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should a nation inhabited by people give acreage the right to choose the leaders?
Acreage, sheep, goats, steers and such should not count.
17 May 2023 9:13 pm
Founders' intent:
Your congressman represents local residents.
Your senator represents state residents.
Your president represents national residents.
Your congressman represents local residents.
Your senator represents state residents.
Your president represents national residents.
17 May 2023 9:14 pm
17 May 2023 9:25 pm
240 years ago this was settled by a compromise … I am not sure why anyone wishes to debate this issue again … stupid is as …
Who is online
In total there are 1844 users online :: 19 registered, 17 bots, and 1808 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, roadkill, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, MR-7, jerra b, Skans, Punch, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Cedar, nefarious101, 31st Arrival, *Huey
Bots: Scrapy, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, proximic, XenForo, app.hypefactors.com, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, Feedfetcher-Google, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, GPTBot, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot