Democrats DO NOT have the correct mindset to wield THAT kind of power... THEY have SHOWN they will ABUSE the power against innocent people for Political purposes... ONCE they have the power.. the ONLY way to take it back is TOO HORRIFIC to think about... but the NAZIS had that kind of power once... and the WORLD was nearly torn apart...Beekeeper » 19 May 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Now, just as to be expected, DEMOCRATS are going to be MORE THAN HAPPY to make SURE you say NOTHING BAD about them, government, or anything the shove up your ARSE!!!
What's next"?? INTERNMENT CAMPS to REEDUCATE anyone that doesn't subscribe to the PROGRESSIVE NAZI AGENDA???
The Democrat-controlled Senate proposed a new bill to censor and police Americans’ First Amendment rights.
Brought forth by Democrat Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO), the “Digital Platform Commission Act (DPCA)” would flag misinformation and hate speech on the internet.
The bill creates a federal agency to do nothing but the mandate and enforce guardrails against people who spread so-called “misinformation,” giving out consequences for information Democrats deem wrong.
The bill would violate the American Constitution.
“It’s past time for a thoughtful and comprehensive approach to regulating digital platforms that have amassed extraordinary power over our economy, society, and democracy,” Bennet said. “We don’t have to choose between letting digital platforms write their own rules, allowing competitors like China and the E.U. write those rules, or leaving it to politicians in Congress. Instead, we should follow the long precedent in American history of empowering an expert body to protect the public interest through common sense rules and oversight for complex and powerful sectors of the economy.”
If passed by Congress, the Federal Digital Platforms Commission would have five commissioners appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Commission would have the authority to promulgate regulations, impose civil penalties, hold hearings, conduct investigations, and support research.
However, the bill lacks specific details on how it would not infringe upon free speech. Instead, it relies on government-appointed “experts” to decide whether something is “misinformation” or not.
As Democrats praise censoring speech that fails to align with their progressive agenda, Republicans sound the alarm on the party’s plan to restrict God-given rights.
Constitutional attorney Harmeet Dhillon called the bill “unconstitutional… evil and stupid,” while Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) highlighted the hypocrisy of the Democrat-backed bill saying, saying that the “largest area of misinformation is coming from the government.”
Look at your last statement, they already pushed too far and you refuse to accept it. Quick draw another line in the sand with the tides coming in.
And then what?
OH trust me, they have more than the mindset to wield that kind of power. And DEMAND it in many way and are all to willing to use FORCE at the end of a GUN to obtain it too. NAZIS will seem like PIKERS if these goons ever get to use any power they grab.ConservativeWave » 19 May 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats DO NOT have the correct mindset to wield THAT kind of power... THEY have SHOWN they will ABUSE the power against innocent people for Political purposes... ONCE they have the power.. the ONLY way to take it back is TOO HORRIFIC to think about... but the NAZIS had that kind of power once... and the WORLD was nearly torn apart...
Well, we can safely say that about 1/3 of them are ALREADY bowing down and bending over for GOVERNMENT to control their lives.michaelf » 20 May 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's hard to say how far it might go but I think things are going to continue to get more divided and more ugly in this country. Historically, things haven't worked out well for governments who try to control what people think and say. Are people in this country ready to be controlled like people in China are? We'll see how well the American people have been trained as pets.
Now they are trying to codify it so that the "outrage" will hopefully be less and it will pass muster with the SCOTUS.
cod·i·fyBeekeeper » 20 May 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ Now they are trying to codify it so that the "outrage" will hopefully be less and it will pass muster with the SCOTUS.
Of which it WON'T, but the desperation of these LWNJs to control your entire life is becoming more and more evident in the bills they propose in Congress.
BuckNaked » 20 May 2023, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ cod·i·fy
/ˈkädəˌfī,ˈkōdəˌfī/
verb
- arrange (laws or rules) into a systematic code.
"the statutes have codified certain branches of common law"
Similar:
systematize
systemize
organize
arrange
order
marshal
set out
chart
structure
tabulate
catalog
list
sort
dispose
index
classify
class
categorize
compile
group
range
file
log
grade
rate
assort
- arrange according to a plan or system.
"Verdi helped codify an international operatic culture"
BuckNaked » 20 May 2023, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ cod·i·fy
/ˈkädəˌfī,ˈkōdəˌfī/
verb
- arrange (laws or rules) into a systematic code.
"the statutes have codified certain branches of common law"
Similar:
systematize
systemize
organize
arrange
order
marshal
set out
chart
structure
tabulate
catalog
list
sort
dispose
index
classify
class
categorize
compile
group
range
file
log
grade
rate
assort
- arrange according to a plan or system.
"Verdi helped codify an international operatic culture"
orchestrated and organized social discrimination between ancestral lineages. Mind over matter semantics rule of laws leaving those in charge of training brains to mind cradle to grave stay in power of moralizing, legalizing, ethical social behavior as they dreamed necessary to sustain reasonable doubt until extinction.
you knew i knew?Nostradamus'omh » 20 May 2023, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ orchestrated and organized social discrimination between ancestral lineages. Mind over matter semantics rule of laws leaving those in charge of training brains to mind cradle to grave stay in power of moralizing, legalizing, ethical social behavior as they dreamed necessary to sustain reasonable doubt until extinction.
I knew you knew all along. Life only lasts as long as reproductions continue to reproduce another last generation so far replacing their previous 4 generation gaps lived to this point of time.
here I go again, with the origami thing. https://i.postimg.cc/ydBbJs7J/Picture-63.jpg
3 perpendicular axses, one vertical, 2 horizontal, all 90 degrees from one another. all equal distant from the core leaving a 7th position surrounded by 8 triangulating corners of open ended interpretations from a common time each reproduction shares here now.
See. genetically using the same figure, vertical is mom and dad, horizontal is 4 grandparents in the center is each great great grandchild replacing their 4 previous generation gaps *** arriving one at a time since inception of any species native to this atmosphere specifically alive now.
Socially speaking the vertical axis poles are academia and arts doesn't matter the two horizontal rotating all the time. economics, politics, religions, social consensus/democracy/dictatorship.
Oh did you see the optics of 6 pyramids of reasonable doubt with all their bases in contact with each other sustaining a 24/7 relative time zones to eternal separation of life native in any atmosphere living happens in this universal moment. nothing stays the same total sum achieved so far, twice.
Gotcha.
Since out first conversation. and your avatar at.org came from this.