Bad idea.Vegas » 22 May 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would like to propose doxing to be allowed for any child groomer/sexual predator here. People like @Xavier_Onassis , and the other pervs, deserve to be exposed online. The public has a right to know who these low life's are. I don't know how to find personal info, but it's worth a shot. XO is dumb enough to accidently give enough info out.
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove
There's no point in doing this. Something like that would be a "one-shot" thing. Basically, it would kill the forum. Either its "No Holds Barred", or its not. Also, I like having XO around - he's only a 90% idiot. Sometimes, he has something worthwhile to say. It's like banning a really **** made gun - like a Lorcin .380. Yeah, it sucks, but if it wasn't for my Lorcin 380 to practice polishing various parts, I might have ruined some more valuable guns.Vegas » 22 May 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would like to propose doxing to be allowed for any child groomer/sexual predator here. People like @Xavier_Onassis , and the other pervs, deserve to be exposed online. The public has a right to know who these low life's are. I don't know how to find personal info, but it's worth a shot. XO is dumb enough to accidently give enough info out.
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove
Blather on an anonymous site is not evidence of wrongdoing.Vegas » 22 May 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would like to propose doxing to be allowed for any child groomer/sexual predator here. People like @Xavier_Onassis , and the other pervs, deserve to be exposed online. The public has a right to know who these low life's are. I don't know how to find personal info, but it's worth a shot. XO is dumb enough to accidently give enough info out.
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove
No. We don't cave on that.Vegas » 22 May 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would like to propose doxing to be allowed for any child groomer/sexual predator here. People like @Xavier_Onassis , and the other pervs, deserve to be exposed online. The public has a right to know who these low life's are. I don't know how to find personal info, but it's worth a shot. XO is dumb enough to accidently give enough info out.
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove
No, there ARE holds barred. Advocating pedophilia is verbotten.Skans » 22 May 2023, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ There's no point in doing this. Something like that would be a "one-shot" thing. Basically, it would kill the forum. Either its "No Holds Barred", or its not.
False.
Not illegal at this time. When my plans for world domination are realized, it will be a death sentence - and the law will be applied ex post facto.DeezerShoove » 22 May 2023, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Blather on an anonymous site is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Support of the gays/drag queens children story hour is just creepy, not illegal.
I'll make sure to not impede your progress.Cannonpointer » 22 May 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Not illegal at this time. When my plans for world domination are realized, it will be a death sentence - and the law will be applied ex post facto.
All of the groomers are grooming on borrowed time.![]()
I'm going to make you a colonel.
Gomez Addams loved it when Morticia spoke French......
Drove the boy wild...
How about we ban you!?Vegas » 22 May 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course you are going to say that. You are also a pedo. You all stick together.
Ok, "No Holds Barred" is Holds Barred. LOL, sort of a parallel with your angry-man logic concerning the vax. Now, moving along, as for Xavier, I reckon you think he's a bigger idiot than 90%. I give him 10% because he does have some investment literacy.Cannonpointer » 22 May 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, there ARE holds barred. Advocating pedophilia is verbotten.
Another hold barred is doxing. The one does not negate the other.
False.
The lab rat ^ admitted I used logic.Skans » 22 May 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, "No Holds Barred" is Holds Barred. LOL, sort of a parallel with your angry-man logic concerning the vax.
You two would make good debate opponents for one another. Neither of you is very honest.Skans » 22 May 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Regardless, I understand XO's point about trannies and kids. I don't agree with it, not at all. But, I understand his position. I'd rather debate his position on "trannies cause no harm" than have the guy banned or doxxed.
As Francis said going into Czechoslovakia, "Finally, I get to kill somebody."
You ARE slated for the "disposal" unit. "Taking out the trash" will be your bailiwick.DeezerShoove » 22 May 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ As Francis said going into Czechoslovakia, "Finally, I get to kill somebody."