It is when you have an angry divided country.Neo » 28 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Companies trying to appeal to lgbtqrstuv audiences is understandable and should be non controversial. Hiding gender confusion from parents, having children taking chemical castration drugs, teaching gender and sexual confusion to kids are all disgusting and should be fought. A beer company making a can for an adult gender confused influencer shouldn't cause as much drama as it did.
What don't you understand? I doubt most folks really care. Take me. I have never thought about this in my life. But I do now!!!Neo » 28 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Companies trying to appeal to lgbtqrstuv audiences is understandable and should be non controversial. Hiding gender confusion from parents, having children taking chemical castration drugs, teaching gender and sexual confusion to kids are all disgusting and should be fought. A beer company making a can for an adult gender confused influencer shouldn't cause as much drama as it did.
It's the motive that has people up in arms. There is a segment that is pushing to normalize abnormal behavior and they are targeting children and young adults to indoctrinate future generations.Neo » 28 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Companies trying to appeal to lgbtqrstuv audiences is understandable and should be non controversial. Hiding gender confusion from parents, having children taking chemical castration drugs, teaching gender and sexual confusion to kids are all disgusting and should be fought. A beer company making a can for an adult gender confused influencer shouldn't cause as much drama as it did.
I don't think I am. Selling products to a group you disagree with is common practice. It's American as Apple pie. Boycotts and outrage is misdirected. Think the focus should be on indoctrination of generations of youth in the vicarious outrage culture. We need a return to tolerance of different views, including those thar divide us.RedheadedStranger » 28 May 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ It's the motive that has people up in arms. There is a segment that is pushing to normalize abnormal behavior and they are targeting children and young adults to indoctrinate future generations.
You're missing the forest for the trees.
all of the "fighting" activities are what comes with the new gay invasion. it's not just letting some one be gay, which as you say would be ok, but it's allowing them to recruit the children.Neo » 28 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Companies trying to appeal to lgbtqrstuv audiences is understandable and should be non controversial. Hiding gender confusion from parents, having children taking chemical castration drugs, teaching gender and sexual confusion to kids are all disgusting and should be fought. A beer company making a can for an adult gender confused influencer shouldn't cause as much drama as it did.
There is no tolerance for some views, none at all.Neo » 28 May 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think I am. Selling products to a group you disagree with is common practice. It's American as Apple pie. Boycotts and outrage is misdirected. Think the focus should be on indoctrination of generations of youth in the vicarious outrage culture. We need a return to tolerance of different views, including those thar divide us.
Agreed. On one hand Neo has a point, but it's also another brick in the wall.sootedupCyndi » 28 May 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ What don't you understand? I doubt most folks really care. Take me. I have never thought about this in my life. But I do now!!!
Stop shoving it in our face. sell your products and keep your face out of woke Politics. The people are speaking.... sick of it.
The question is, just what are you willing to "tolerate"?Neo » 28 May 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think I am. Selling products to a group you disagree with is common practice. It's American as Apple pie. Boycotts and outrage is misdirected. Think the focus should be on indoctrination of generations of youth in the vicarious outrage culture. We need a return to tolerance of different views, including those thar divide us.
None of that should be tolerated. Die on that hill, not some adult sick, offensive, walking stereotype of a woman getting a bud light can with his face on it. Need to focus on the real danger, which is grooming kids.RedheadedStranger » 28 May 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ The question is, just what are you willing to "tolerate"?
When it comes time to tolerate middle aged adults taking 9 year olds as sexual partners, will you say the same thing?
When it comes to letting 12 year old kids choose to mutilate themselves because mentally ill adults have convinced them it was the right thing to do, is that cool too?
I could give a crap less about what consenting adults do with each other, but when they start targeting the children with their deviant BS, that's just a bridge too far for me.
As one other poster put it, the Bud Light thing is just another brick in the wall, or as I was infering, another tree in the forest.
Once you "accept" one thing, they always take it to the next level.
Neo » 28 May 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ None of that should be tolerated. Die on that hill, not some adult sick, offensive, walking stereotype of a woman getting a bud light can with his face on it. Need to focus on the real danger, which is grooming kids.
That's just it... the sick walking stereotype of a thing on the beer can is just one more rung in the ladder that's leading to the "normalization" of grooming and abusing kids.Neo » 28 May 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ None of that should be tolerated. Die on that hill, not some adult sick, offensive, walking stereotype of a woman getting a bud light can with his face on it. Need to focus on the real danger, which is grooming kids.
You seem to be suggesting that normal people should just accept having the abnormal forced on them, using their own money to do it. Do you think bug beer or bug lite beer have a right to DEMAND patronage?Neo » 28 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Companies trying to appeal to lgbtqrstuv audiences is understandable and should be non controversial. Hiding gender confusion from parents, having children taking chemical castration drugs, teaching gender and sexual confusion to kids are all disgusting and should be fought. A beer company making a can for an adult gender confused influencer shouldn't cause as much drama as it did.
WE need to be tolerant, while they go for our kids. That's retarded.Neo » 28 May 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think I am. Selling products to a group you disagree with is common practice. It's American as Apple pie. Boycotts and outrage is misdirected. Think the focus should be on indoctrination of generations of youth in the vicarious outrage culture. We need a return to tolerance of different views, including those thar divide us.
It's on the top of his head.
That is a wrong-headed stance. We need to outlaw queerness again. And I will tell you why:RedheadedStranger » 28 May 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I could give a crap less about what consenting adults do with each other
Which brings us to dildo mulvaney.RedheadedStranger » 28 May 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Once you "accept" one thing, they always take it to the next level.
Putting that face on the can grooms kids.Neo » 28 May 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ None of that should be tolerated. Die on that hill, not some adult sick, offensive, walking stereotype of a woman getting a bud light can with his face on it. Need to focus on the real danger, which is grooming kids.
Throughout history, the villains have BEEN the victors.Chiseler151 » 28 May 2023, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑ History is written by the victor. History is rewritten by the villain.