Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
GLAAD Report Finds 75% of Non-LGBT Adults Are Comfortable Seeing Queer People in Ads
GLAAD Report Finds 75% of Non-LGBT Adults Are Comfortable Seeing Queer People in Ads
By Punch
1 Jun 2023 12:16 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Jun 2023 12:16 pm
Are you a hater?
GLAAD Report Finds 75% of Non-LGBT Adults Are Comfortable Seeing Queer People in Ads (msn.com)
The majority of non-LGBT adults are comfortable seeing queer people in ads, TV and movies, according to a new GLAAD survey.The survey — results for which were released Thursday, June 1, the first day of Pride Month — was part of GLAAD's annual Accelerating Acceptance Study. Based on a national respondent pool of 2,533 U.S. adults in February, the study also concluded that a vast majority of non-LGBT adults support equal rights for the LGBT community (at 84%), 75% of non-LGBT adults are comfortable seeing queer representation in ads and 73% are comfortable seeing an LGBT character included in a movie or a TV show.
Relatedly, 70% of respondents agree companies should publicly support the LGBT community through advertising and sponsorships.Less than a third of respondents, however, knew a transgender person personally, emphasizing, per GLAAD, "an urgent need for education and representation."
These results came as a number of companies have come under fire for their public support of LGBT customers via Pride campaigns, influencer partnerships and more. Bud Light memorably faced a massive boycott from conservative drinkers in April after an Instagram sponsorship with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney, posted April 1, sparked right-wing media outcry, viral dissent from figures like Kid Rock and Megyn Kelly and a plummet in share value for parent company Anheuser-Busch. CEO Brendan Whitworth then backtracked the company's promotion of Mulvaney, writing in a statement, "We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people. We are in the business of bringing people together over a beer."
Target's annual Pride campaign, meanwhile, has been subject to ridicule and in some cases vandalism this year, leading to seasonal displays being moved to the back of its stores and company stock taking a hit. Target CEO Brian Cornell denounced the pushback and expressed that such sentiment has put employees in danger."The 2023 Accelerating Acceptance study clearly shows the destructive repercussions of inaccurate rhetoric and baseless legislation, and showcases GLAAD's crucial role in the ongoing fight for full LGBTQ equality and acceptance," Ellis' statement continued. "The study demonstrates an urgent need for education and representation, factors we know can move attitudes toward full acceptance." (Translation: we want our perversions normalized. -Punch)
(9) Ford’s Very Gay Raptor Redefines ‘Tough’ for a New Generation - YouTube
Ford ***
1 Jun 2023 12:19 pm
Is there any possibility that GLAAD (run by a radical New York leftist lesbian) would have done a study or published a report that found that 75% of Straight people can't stand seeing homosexuals *** off with each other in advertisements?
1 Jun 2023 12:28 pm
The beauty of it is if I do not like an ad.... I change the channel, go to the bathroom, or just ignore it. If it is an internet thing and I can opt out.. i do. I do this for political ads.
1 Jun 2023 12:32 pm
1 Jun 2023 12:37 pm
It's a Gay and Lesbian Allegiance Against Defamation report...Punch » 01 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Are you a hater?
GLAAD Report Finds 75% of Non-LGBT Adults Are Comfortable Seeing Queer People in Ads (msn.com)
The majority of non-LGBT adults are comfortable seeing queer people in ads, TV and movies, according to a new GLAAD survey.The survey — results for which were released Thursday, June 1, the first day of Pride Month — was part of GLAAD's annual Accelerating Acceptance Study. Based on a national respondent pool of 2,533 U.S. adults in February, the study also concluded that a vast majority of non-LGBT adults support equal rights for the LGBT community (at 84%), 75% of non-LGBT adults are comfortable seeing queer representation in ads and 73% are comfortable seeing an LGBT character included in a movie or a TV show.
Relatedly, 70% of respondents agree companies should publicly support the LGBT community through advertising and sponsorships.Less than a third of respondents, however, knew a transgender person personally, emphasizing, per GLAAD, "an urgent need for education and representation."
These results came as a number of companies have come under fire for their public support of LGBT customers via Pride campaigns, influencer partnerships and more. Bud Light memorably faced a massive boycott from conservative drinkers in April after an Instagram sponsorship with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney, posted April 1, sparked right-wing media outcry, viral dissent from figures like Kid Rock and Megyn Kelly and a plummet in share value for parent company Anheuser-Busch. CEO Brendan Whitworth then backtracked the company's promotion of Mulvaney, writing in a statement, "We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people. We are in the business of bringing people together over a beer."
Target's annual Pride campaign, meanwhile, has been subject to ridicule and in some cases vandalism this year, leading to seasonal displays being moved to the back of its stores and company stock taking a hit. Target CEO Brian Cornell denounced the pushback and expressed that such sentiment has put employees in danger."The 2023 Accelerating Acceptance study clearly shows the destructive repercussions of inaccurate rhetoric and baseless legislation, and showcases GLAAD's crucial role in the ongoing fight for full LGBTQ equality and acceptance," Ellis' statement continued. "The study demonstrates an urgent need for education and representation, factors we know can move attitudes toward full acceptance." (Translation: we want our perversions normalized. -Punch)
(9) Ford’s Very Gay Raptor Redefines ‘Tough’ for a New Generation - YouTube
Ford ***
What do you expect?
I'm sure there is no bias in their findings.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2023 12:40 pm
1 Jun 2023 12:42 pm
One can favorably sabotage a poll simply by how questions are posed.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ It's a Gay and Lesbian Allegiance Against Defamation report...
What do you expect?
I'm sure there is no bias in their findings.
1 Jun 2023 12:44 pm
Or by the demographic you're posing the questions too.Sumela » 01 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ One can favorably sabotage a poll simply by how questions are posed.
I doubt that asked very many rural Southerners what they thought about it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2023 12:47 pm
Yes exactly!!RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Or by the demographic you're posing the questions too.
I doubt that asked very many rural Southerners what they thought about it.
1 Jun 2023 12:54 pm
Of course, everyone does this. But, your statement ignores what is really happening. Radical leftist homosexual groups, like GLAAD, are extorting companies into championing homosexual political causes. GLAAD is behind it and these companies have "jumped the shark". They will pay the price. Because, when it comes right down to it, GLAAD is made up of a few very loud, angry queers. The normal straight people, and conservatives in this nation are vastly more numerous, usually silent but a true economic powerhouse when they act in concert.impartialobserver » 01 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The beauty of it is if I do not like an ad.... I change the channel, go to the bathroom, or just ignore it. If it is an internet thing and I can opt out.. i do. I do this for political ads.
Dylan Mulvaney - - - - right, "OH, ****!", screams Michel Doukeris.
1 Jun 2023 12:58 pm
First they came for the communists....impartialobserver » 01 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The beauty of it is if I do not like an ad.... I change the channel, go to the bathroom, or just ignore it. If it is an internet thing and I can opt out.. i do. I do this for political ads.
I did not speak out, for I was not a communist..
1 Jun 2023 1:00 pm
Why do you even bother responding to me?RebelGator » 01 Jun 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ First they came for the communists....
I did not speak out, for I was not a communist..
1 Jun 2023 1:02 pm
I thought maybe you didn't know about apathy.....
1 Jun 2023 1:03 pm
Notice the use of "Non-LGBT"... like being LGBT is the norm instead of the exception.
The subliminal propaganda is woven into everything these days.
The subliminal propaganda is woven into everything these days.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2023 1:04 pm
I know all about it. Yet, because I do not share your views 100%... I must be apathetic. My new job has killed my patience for binary thinkers like you. I had someone file an appeal stating that I had discriminated against them because they were white. Guess what? there is absolutely no way of knowing that if all you look at is their claim... this sounds like something you would do.
1 Jun 2023 1:06 pm
I knew you were a racist.impartialobserver » 01 Jun 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I know all about it. Yet, because I do not share your views 100%... I must be apathetic. My new job has killed my patience for binary thinkers like you. I had someone file an appeal stating that I had discriminated against them because they were white. Guess what? there is absolutely no way of knowing that if all you look at is their claim... this sounds like something you would do.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2023 1:06 pm
You can call it binary, I can call it focus.impartialobserver » 01 Jun 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I know all about it. Yet, because I do not share your views 100%... I must be apathetic. My new job has killed my patience for binary thinkers like you. I had someone file an appeal stating that I had discriminated against them because they were white. Guess what? there is absolutely no way of knowing that if all you look at is their claim... this sounds like something you would do.
1 Jun 2023 1:07 pm
especially because race/ethnicity is not part of the claim.. not a single mention of it. And yet I am going to hunt this person down on Facebook to find out if they are white. Do you know why his claim was rejected? He had $425.00 in total earnings for the last 5 quarters... but it is about race.
1 Jun 2023 1:10 pm
I have to ask... did your immediate superior treat you as thought you were guilty until proven innocent, or the other way around?impartialobserver » 01 Jun 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ especially because race/ethnicity is not part of the claim.. not a single mention of it. And yet I am going to hunt this person down on Facebook to find out if they are white. Do you know why his claim was rejected? He had $425.00 in total earnings for the last 5 quarters... but it is about race.
Just curious.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2023 1:12 pm
RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I have to ask... did your immediate superior treat you as thought you were guilty until proven innocent, or the other way around?
Just curious.
No, he agreed with me. State law backs me up and besides... there is this text on the form that lays out the dollar amounts. The claimant not reading it.. is not my problem
Who is online
In total there are 4366 users online :: 16 registered, 18 bots, and 4332 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, michaelf, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Not, okhttp, NING, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, Pinterest, coccocbot, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, SiteLockSpider, CriteoBot, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Baiduspider