HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASquatchman » 03 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Because he gave them back as soon as he found them.
Trump didn't.
He thought he could do whatever he wanted. They weren't his.
He's going to find out the hard way he can't.

So I guess if someone robs a liquor store, then all is forgiven so long as they give the money back.Squatchman » 03 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Because he gave them back as soon as he found them.
Trump didn't.
He thought he could do whatever he wanted. They weren't his.
He's going to find out the hard way he can't.
Trump will be prosecuted for Obstruction of justice relating to the deliberate theft of national defense information documents.RedheadedStranger » 03 Jun 2023, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑ Biden will too, you can rest assured.
Trump will be prosecuted full tilt though... because Orange Man Bad.
https://justthenews.com/government/fede ... estigation
Nah... the DOJ hasn't been weaponized.
Prospero » 06 Jun 2023, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ Trump will be prosecuted for Obstruction of justice relating to the deliberate theft of national defense information documents.
The circumstances of Trump an the documents are far more aggravated, enough to warrant an indictment.
1. He told us on TV he has the right to take them. (No, he doesn't.)
2. There is testimony that he instructed employees to move boxe of docs and hide them from the government, after a subpoena. He conducted rehearsals of it.
3. A search warrant was issued for a search of his property, warrant signed by a federal magistrate, because he was refusing to cooperate.
4 There is mens rea and obstruction, both components of violating the Espionage act, and, as such, are the aggravated circumstances warranting indictment.
The circumstances of Biden and Pence are inadvertent acquisition and full cooperation with the government in the return of the documents. Not enough
enough aggravated circumstances which warrant indictment (in fact, none, the mere holding of such docs, per DOJ policy of prosecutorial discretion, is not to prosecute for mere possession, alone, a courtesy extended to senators and members or the executive branch)
but stupid people cannot grasp this.
"...off to ignore land you go"Prospero » 06 Jun 2023, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ Trump will be prosecuted for Obstruction of justice relating to the deliberate theft of national defense information documents.
The circumstances of Trump an the documents are far more aggravated, enough to warrant an indictment.
1. He told us on TV he has the right to take them. (No, he doesn't.)
2. There is testimony that he instructed employees to move boxe of docs and hide them from the government, after a subpoena. He conducted rehearsals of it.
3. A search warrant was issued for a search of his property, warrant signed by a federal magistrate, because he was refusing to cooperate.
4 There is mens rea and obstruction, both components of violating the Espionage act, and, as such, are the aggravated circumstances warranting indictment.
The circumstances of Biden and Pence are inadvertent acquisition and full cooperation with the government in the return of the documents. Not enough
enough aggravated circumstances which warrant indictment (in fact, none, the mere holding of such docs, per DOJ policy of prosecutorial discretion, is not to prosecute for mere possession, alone, a courtesy extended to senators and members or the executive branch)
but stupid people cannot grasp this.
i ignore no one
Squatchman » 03 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Because he gave them back as soon as he found them.
Trump didn't.
He thought he could do whatever he wanted. They weren't his.
He's going to find out the hard way he can't.
RedheadedStranger » 03 Jun 2023, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑ Biden will too, you can rest assured.
Trump will be prosecuted full tilt though... because Orange Man Bad.
https://justthenews.com/government/fede ... estigation
Nah... the DOJ hasn't been weaponized.

So, explain Bill Clinton keeping classified documents in his sock drawer.Squatchman » 03 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Because he gave them back as soon as he found them.
Trump didn't.
He thought he could do whatever he wanted. They weren't his.
He's going to find out the hard way he can't.
Strange how the people who were working with Trump and his team, objected to the raid, order by the DOJ in Washington, because he was cooperating with them. Think their testimony will be important?Prospero » 06 Jun 2023, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ Trump will be prosecuted for Obstruction of justice relating to the deliberate theft of national defense information documents.
The circumstances of Trump an the documents are far more aggravated, enough to warrant an indictment.
1. He told us on TV he has the right to take them. (No, he doesn't.)
2. There is testimony that he instructed employees to move boxe of docs and hide them from the government, after a subpoena. He conducted rehearsals of it.
3. A search warrant was issued for a search of his property, warrant signed by a federal magistrate, because he was refusing to cooperate.
4 There is mens rea and obstruction, both components of violating the Espionage act, and, as such, are the aggravated circumstances warranting indictment.
The circumstances of Biden and Pence are inadvertent acquisition and full cooperation with the government in the return of the documents. Not enough
enough aggravated circumstances which warrant indictment (in fact, none, the mere holding of such docs, per DOJ policy of prosecutorial discretion, is not to prosecute for mere possession, alone, a courtesy extended to senators and members or the executive branch)
but stupid people cannot grasp this.
There was no raid, so any complaint of 'raid' is moot.golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Strange how the people who were working with Trump and his team, objected to the raid, order by the DOJ in Washington, because he was cooperating with them. Think their testimony will be important?
Drivel.RebelGator » 07 Jun 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The blatant crucifixion of Donald Trump is going to land you assholes a special place in hell.
The case of Bill Clinton wasn't about national defense information documents, it was about audio tapes. so, false equivalency. But, I'll include hillary.golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ So, explain Bill Clinton keeping classified documents in his sock drawer.
He did return them "as soon as he found them"?
And Biden? Clearly not.
Prospero » 08 Jun 2023, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ Regarding the mishandling of national defense information documents, are the cases of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden the same as that of Donald Trump?
Bing AI reports:
The cases of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are not the same as that of Donald Trump. In 2016, the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified material on her private email server dogged her presidential campaign for months – ending with the Department of Justice declining to prosecute her because there wasn’t evidence that she or others intended to mishandle the documents1. On the other hand, Donald Trump was found to have mishandled classified information while he was president2. Joe Biden was also accused of mishandling classified documents when lawyers for him discovered about 10 classified documents at his office in the Penn Biden Center, a nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC. His counsel said the documents were immediately turned over to the National Archives34.