It is!sootedupCyndi » 05 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ When there's a disaster- and the power goes out. At the hospitals and nursing homes..?
Are they preparing to install GAS powered generators?
stock up on candles?
what?
This is a stoopid post.

sootedupCyndi » 05 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ When there's a disaster- and the power goes out. At the hospitals and nursing homes..?
Are they preparing to install GAS powered generators?
stock up on candles?
what?
This is a stoopid post.
It is- and it isn't. When we lost the power- and I was babysitting nasty old father- his oxygen pumping machine- didn't work. It was my responsibility to keep his pumping machine going- and start the generator. Which i guess went ok- until i had to pull the cord more then 3 times...
Me? pay attention... I'm probably the most anti -climate change chick around...Punch » 05 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ So you don't care that your tax dollars are going to pay for the newly established "Office of Climate Change and Health Equity." Got it.
That's a pic of her looking @Buck Naked naked.
Hahahah!sootedupCyndi » 05 Jun 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ It is- and it isn't. When we lost the power- and I was babysitting nasty old father- his oxygen pumping machine- didn't work. It was my responsibility to keep his pumping machine going- and start the generator. Which i guess went ok- until i had to pull the cord more then 3 times...
she is up for reelection, after that she will drop itPunch » 05 Jun 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑
"The most important and far-reaching reform would establish the "Office of Climate Change and Health Equity." The proposed office would oversee facilitating "a robust, Federal response to the impact of climate change on the health of American populations composed of individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE YOU, CRACKER.
Healthy heterosexual White males over the age of 5 but under the age of 66 would likely be considered exempt from whatever special benefits are bestowed on those lucky enough to be labeled "individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
The Green New Deal is back, and it’s more radical than ever (msn.com)
Four years ago, socialist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and her much-older socialist ally in the Senate, Ed Markey, D-Mass., made shockwaves by introducing a sweeping proposal for a Green New Deal. The Green New Deal would have, among many other things, create massive new spending programs, eliminate "pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible," transform all U.S. manufacturing and transportation, It would also make substantial changes to America’s vast agricultural industry. The final price tag as high as $94.4 trillion. Not surprisingly, it did not get through the Senate.However, the Green New Deal’s past failures haven’t deterred the most socialistic wing of the Democratic Party. AOC and Markey have announced they are reintroducing the "Green New Deal for Health." that "boldly reimagines a health care system that is prepared and empowered to protect the health and well-being of our workers, our communities, and our planet."The proposal includes numerous socialistic and progressive policies, including a $130 billion investment in community health centers, $100 billion in new government grants to improve medical facilities’ "climate resilience and disaster mitigation efforts," and countless new climate change regulations meant to establish a "green medical supply chain."
why does that surprise you? i'm not a dummy!nuckinfutz » 05 Jun 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Hahahah!
So you got my Bukowski? I'm surprised!
@sooted up Cyndi
Because all my images have been blocked!
One image is still coming in loud and clear...nuckinfutz » 05 Jun 2023, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Because all my images have been blocked!
@sooted up Cyndi
dammit the water was freezin man cmon
Punch » 05 Jun 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑
"The most important and far-reaching reform would establish the "Office of Climate Change and Health Equity." The proposed office would oversee facilitating "a robust, Federal response to the impact of climate change on the health of American populations composed of individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE YOU, CRACKER.
Healthy heterosexual White males over the age of 5 but under the age of 66 would likely be considered exempt from whatever special benefits are bestowed on those lucky enough to be labeled "individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
The Green New Deal is back, and it’s more radical than ever (msn.com)
Four years ago, socialist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and her much-older socialist ally in the Senate, Ed Markey, D-Mass., made shockwaves by introducing a sweeping proposal for a Green New Deal. The Green New Deal would have, among many other things, create massive new spending programs, eliminate "pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible," transform all U.S. manufacturing and transportation, It would also make substantial changes to America’s vast agricultural industry. The final price tag as high as $94.4 trillion. Not surprisingly, it did not get through the Senate.However, the Green New Deal’s past failures haven’t deterred the most socialistic wing of the Democratic Party. AOC and Markey have announced they are reintroducing the "Green New Deal for Health." that "boldly reimagines a health care system that is prepared and empowered to protect the health and well-being of our workers, our communities, and our planet."The proposal includes numerous socialistic and progressive policies, including a $130 billion investment in community health centers, $100 billion in new government grants to improve medical facilities’ "climate resilience and disaster mitigation efforts," and countless new climate change regulations meant to establish a "green medical supply chain."
Ask Misty to fix itnuckinfutz » 05 Jun 2023, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Because all my images have been blocked!
@sooted up Cyndi

Can you post a photo from a bukkake flick?nefarious101 » 05 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑ why is it every pic of AOC they publish looks like she's posing in a bukkake flick?
Isn't she the one who was married to and **** her brother?...or is it another progressive democrat that did that?.....and why would anyone have to ask a question like that about a member of Congress?...and be right?
Never went away. You should experience the way they won't let go of it. Talk about price gouging, price a solar system that is "supposed to do" allow you to pay someone else for the electricity than the utility that created the power grid and the local governments priced it out of competition of solar using epa, and other departments of government.Punch » 05 Jun 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑
"The most important and far-reaching reform would establish the "Office of Climate Change and Health Equity." The proposed office would oversee facilitating "a robust, Federal response to the impact of climate change on the health of American populations composed of individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE YOU, CRACKER.
Healthy heterosexual White males over the age of 5 but under the age of 66 would likely be considered exempt from whatever special benefits are bestowed on those lucky enough to be labeled "individuals disproportionately affected by climate change."
Four years ago, socialist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and her much-older socialist ally in the Senate, Ed Markey, D-Mass., made shockwaves by introducing a sweeping proposal for a Green New Deal. The Green New Deal would have, among many other things, create massive new spending programs, eliminate "pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible," transform all U.S. manufacturing and transportation, It would also make substantial changes to America’s vast agricultural industry. The final price tag as high as $94.4 trillion. Not surprisingly, it did not get through the Senate.However, the Green New Deal’s past failures haven’t deterred the most socialistic wing of the Democratic Party. AOC and Markey have announced they are reintroducing the "Green New Deal for Health." that "boldly reimagines a health care system that is prepared and empowered to protect the health and well-being of our workers, our communities, and our planet."The proposal includes numerous socialistic and progressive policies, including a $130 billion investment in community health centers, $100 billion in new government grants to improve medical facilities’ "climate resilience and disaster mitigation efforts," and countless new climate change regulations meant to establish a "green medical supply chain."
nefarious101 » 05 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑ why is it every pic of AOC they publish looks like she's posing in a bukkake flick?
Isn't she the one who was married to and **** her brother?...or is it another progressive democrat that did that?.....and why would anyone have to ask a question like that about a member of Congress?...and be right?