Liberal Forum

"The documents charges are incredibly weak, from what has been reported publicly thus far. The president has full declassification authority, and there is no formal procedure for declassifying documents. Breathless claims of “national security” secrets, even nuclear codes, being brought to Trump’s estate at Mar-a-Lago turned out to be fantasies. Prosecutors may fall back on charges of obstruction of justice, which seem to be just as speculative."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... with-fire/

P.S.  Biden has been rat-holing classified documents since he was a senator. According to the left, his name isn't Trump so it's A-OK.  

Does the left ever think before humping the nearest cow?

See that little feller...his name is Prospero.      


 
 
 

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

Really? That's a good one.  

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

Except for one thing...yer simply parroting the dems' narratives.  

DeezerShoove » 08 Jun 2023, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:16 am

Really? That's a good one.

Squatch is being useful again.     

roadkill » 08 Jun 2023, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:19 am

Squatch is being useful again.   

The last time I moved I took the appliances by accident.
Boy, was my face red...

A few months later the new renters said, "Say, now, honey... Isn't the kitchen missing something?"
When I got the call, I was just stocking up the extra refrigerator.
I kept wondering how I never seemed to run out of milk anymore.

That was it. . We had a laugh and are friends all these years later.
All they had to do was ask.

DeezerShoove » 08 Jun 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:27 am

The last time I moved I took the appliances by accident.
Boy, was my face red...

A few months later the new renters said, "Say, now, honey... Isn't the kitchen missing something?"
When I got the call, I was just stocking up the extra refrigerator.
I kept wondering how I never seemed to run out of milk anymore.

That was it. . We had a laugh and are friends all these years later.
All they had to do was ask.

Putin told you to say that didn't he.      

roadkill » 08 Jun 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 7:39 am

"The documents charges are incredibly weak, from what has been reported publicly thus far. The president has full declassification authority, and there is no formal procedure for declassifying documents. Breathless claims of “national security” secrets, even nuclear codes, being brought to Trump’s estate at Mar-a-Lago turned out to be fantasies. Prosecutors may fall back on charges of obstruction of justice, which seem to be just as speculative."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... with-fire/

P.S.  Biden has been rat-holing classified documents since he was a senator. According to the left, his name isn't Trump so it's A-OK.  

Does the left ever think before humping the nearest cow?

See that little feller...his name is Prospero.      


 

The old fat cow seems to like it.  Is her name Hillary?
 

Skans » 08 Jun 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:35 am

The old fat cow seems to like it.  Is her name Hillary?

We'll have to ask Prospero.  

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

I’m not sure that having classified documents is OK as long as you’ll give them back when asked. 

neueregel » 08 Jun 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:48 am

I’m not sure that having classified documents is OK as long as you’ll give them back when asked.

Trump always cooperated with the FBI...one time they simply told Trump to put another lock on the door leading to the docs.


The raid on Trump's home was simply to have optics to show publicly...nothing more.

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

Crybaby.....

neueregel » 08 Jun 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:48 am

I’m not sure that having classified documents is OK as long as you’ll give them back when asked.

It's not OK... but it's also not gonna get you indicted lie not giving them back when asked does.

Question: When Trump is walking around the yard at Sing Sing in his flesh-colored jumpsuit, will he have secret service protection walking around with him?  
 

roadkill » 08 Jun 2023, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 9:27 am

Trump always cooperated with the FBI...one time they simply told Trump to put another lock on the door leading to the docs.

The raid on Trump's home was simply to have optics to show publicly...nothing more.

For sure. Our media has worked overtime to find any difference between what Trump and Biden did and use that as justification for the raid. The truth doesn't mattter.

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

If Trump is only charged with Obstruction in this case, you will be correct.  But if he is charged with violating the Presidential Records Act, we will all know you're a lying **** who was simply parroting the talking points.
 

maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 9:55 am

It's not OK... but it's also not gonna get you indicted lie not giving them back when asked does.

How long does one have to give them back and not get in trouble?

neueregel » 08 Jun 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 10:01 am

For sure. Our media has worked overtime to find any difference between what Trump and Biden did and use that as justification for the raid. The truth doesn't mattter.

Nope...the truth doesn't matter to the left.  

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.

1. Biden, while Senator or VP had No, NONE, Nada authorization, just like you and me.
2.They were in negotiations about the documents.

maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2023, 9:55 am

It's not OK... but it's also not gonna get you indicted lie not giving them back when asked does.

I guess mm hasn't figured out yet that the DOJ/FBI leadership is corrupt.