Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"Indicting a Former President over Nonsense Is Playing with Fire"
"Indicting a Former President over Nonsense Is Playing with Fire"
By roadkill
8 Jun 2023 7:39 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Jun 2023 11:04 am
maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Question: When Trump is walking around the yard at Sing Sing in his flesh-colored jumpsuit, will he have secret service protection walking around with him?
Actually I was wondering if he'll have to share a cell with Joe? Nah...Trump won't be there.
8 Jun 2023 11:06 am
sunburn » 08 Jun 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ 1. Biden, while Senator or VP had No, NONE, Nada authorization, just like you and me.
2.They were in negotiations about the documents.
Careful...Squatch is kinda sensitive.
8 Jun 2023 11:24 am
I dunno...but obviously longer than Pence or Biden took.neueregel » 08 Jun 2023, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ How long does one have to give them back and not get in trouble?
8 Jun 2023 11:29 am
Actually...Biden isn't out of the woods yet. Remember, a sitting President can't be indicted. He better hope he's followed by a fellow idi...err...demonrat.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I dunno...but obviously longer than Pence or Biden took.
8 Jun 2023 11:59 am
they don't care about the repercussions. all they want is Trump out of the running; and anyother outsider that gets wild ideas about upsetting the applecart.roadkill » 08 Jun 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ "The documents charges are incredibly weak, from what has been reported publicly thus far. The president has full declassification authority, and there is no formal procedure for declassifying documents. Breathless claims of “national security” secrets, even nuclear codes, being brought to Trump’s estate at Mar-a-Lago turned out to be fantasies. Prosecutors may fall back on charges of obstruction of justice, which seem to be just as speculative."
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... with-fire/
P.S. Biden has been rat-holing classified documents since he was a senator. According to the left, his name isn't Trump so it's A-OK.
Does the left ever think before humping the nearest cow?
See that little feller...his name is Prospero.
they'll deal with the fall out later.
8 Jun 2023 12:00 pm
Pence too, then?ConsRule » 08 Jun 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Actually...Biden isn't out of the woods yet. Remember, a sitting President can't be indicted. He better hope he's followed by a fellow idi...err...demonrat.
8 Jun 2023 12:00 pm
As a whole, I do not understand the obsession with Trump post-election. He lost.. move on. It would seem that Dems/Libs got what they wanted and that would be enough but appears not.
8 Jun 2023 12:03 pm
I guess you don't listen to the news. The DOJ has already told Pence he is in the clear.
8 Jun 2023 12:32 pm
So this is nothing more than an overdue book that the US librarian has been throwing a temper tantrum over.Squatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.
Has nothing to do with top secret classified nuclear codes being sold to Russia anymore. It's all about unpaid late fees :die:
8 Jun 2023 12:41 pm
Biden should have never had them... he was VP. Lock the **** upSquatchman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ It isn't about classifying or declassifying documents.
It's about trump not giving back things that didn't belong to him.
Biden and the rest turned their documents over as soon as they realized they had them.
Trump's in trouble for not giving them back when they were asked for.
8 Jun 2023 12:41 pm
asshole playing the whatabout game again
8 Jun 2023 12:45 pm
I agree...organized crime will do whatever it takes. There's always a fall guy waiting in the wings.sunburn » 08 Jun 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ they don't care about the repercussions. all they want is Trump out of the running; and anyother outsider that gets wild ideas about upsetting the applecart.
they'll deal with the fall out later.
I think the dems have a subsidiary called "Fall-Guys-R-US".
8 Jun 2023 12:45 pm
that's just the game HE was playing, you stupid moron!
8 Jun 2023 12:46 pm
you don't thing Vice Presidents have security clearances?FJB » 08 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden should have never had them... he was VP. Lock the **** up
8 Jun 2023 12:48 pm
We’ve moved into just making stuff up, now.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I dunno...but obviously longer than Pence or Biden took.
8 Jun 2023 12:49 pm
Sorry mm...you'll have to leave yer mop outside. Nothing personal.
8 Jun 2023 12:51 pm
Are you really that stupid? Where did he say Biden should not have seen them? He said he should have them. You know, classified documents in his office, his garage, etc.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ you don't thing Vice Presidents have security clearances?
BTW...I wasn't playing whataboutism as you suggested. I was correcting your insinuation that Biden is in the clear.
8 Jun 2023 12:58 pm
Both Pence and Biden had classified information at their homes. Both turned it back in when it was discovered. Neither was charged with a crime. Did I make that up?
8 Jun 2023 1:02 pm
So you really think that a future Republican AG will indict former President Joe Biden for mishandling classified information?ConsRule » 08 Jun 2023, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you really that stupid? Where did he say Biden should not have seen them? He said he should have them. You know, classified documents in his office, his garage, etc.
BTW...I wasn't playing whataboutism as you suggested. I was correcting your insinuation that Biden is in the clear.
And if so, will they indict former Vice President Mike Pence for the same thing?
8 Jun 2023 1:09 pm
Where did I say I believe that? Quote my exact words or shut the **** up.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ So you really think that a future Republican AG will indict former President Joe Biden for mishandling classified information?
And if so, will they indict former Vice President Mike Pence for the same thing?
Why would a future AG indict Pence when the current AG (a demonrat) has already cleared him?
Who is online
In total there are 4737 users online :: 12 registered, 19 bots, and 4706 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Adsbot, okhttp, MicroMessenger, Pinterest, proximic, Feeder, Not, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Mediatoolkitbot, NING, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Baiduspider, bingbot