There should be no documents that are classified. Here's why:walkingstick » 09 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ this way they would not have classified information in their possession. how can trump have a jury trial without revealing classified information? he would have to lie; to cover up classified information. digging himself deeper into trouble. usa court system has fallen apart.
Skans » 09 Jun 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ There should be no documents that are classified. Here's why:Who are these government workers that you and I pay with our hard earned tax money to say what information we get to see or not. F- them!!!
- We all paid good money for those documents, they belong to all of us.
- Documents an individual generates while working should be allowed to remain with that individual.
- If you are concerned about identifying someone who is a spy overseas, then DON'T WRITE THE NAME DOWN.
- Documents concerning individual's personal information who work for various branches of government should remain confidential, but not classified.
Do you actually think I'm Buck Naked's SOK? Here's the thing. I've never used a SOK. The only thing close which I have done is post anonymously on this forum while I was still interested in posting on Dot-Org, when it was up and running (badly running).
That moron thinks everybody is a Sok.Skans » 10 Jun 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Do you actually think I'm Buck Naked's SOK? Here's the thing. I've never used a SOK. The only thing close which I have done is post anonymously on this forum while I was still interested in posting on Dot-Org, when it was up and running (badly running).
However, I do find that those who go around accusing others of having SOK's are usually the ones who do this kind of thing. They are the ones who like to attack the individual, not what was actually written. I, on the other hand, typically care more about what was written and have mildly little interest in who wrote it. I suppose that's why I don't really care if I'm responding to someone's SOK or not.