Well, MASSIVELY MANIPULATED NARRATIVE BOY, there is ZERO EVIDENCE that "climate change" is causing any MORE or any bigger wildfires ANYWHERE in the world.Punch » 12 Jun 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑
The future is orange and I don't mean Trump.
Orange skies are the future. Prepare yourself. (msn.com)
As climate change drives an increase in wildfires, we’re seeing more smoke lofted into the upper atmosphere each fire season. Depending on wind and weather, this smoke can spread hundreds or thousands of miles from its source—as we saw in early June on the U.S. East Coast.
And we’re likely to continue seeing it increase in severity, frequency, and longevity as the planet warms. The conditions for “smoke events” impacting major population centers become more frequent and likely each year, as climate change drives conditions—such as heat, drought, and the increasingly important vapor pressure deficit—that promote large wildfire growth.
All citizens should be heeding the words of Greta Thunberg. In a best case scenario, all of the U.S. population can expect to be wearing masks when going outdoors in 7 years.
Beekeeper » 12 Jun 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Bwaaahaaahaaahaaaa.....
You're soooo effing GULLIBLE to the hype and ****!!
NASA 2019 report: Global Wildfires Drop By 25% Since 2003 – Plus Study finds Earth’s tree cover increased by 7% since 1982
“Since NASA satellites program MODIS began collecting measurements there has been a decrease in the total number of square kilometers burned each year. Between 2003 and 2019, that number has dropped by roughly 25 percent.” –NASA Earth Observatory, August 2019
For everyone- Do you have any idea how many trees just maine has? 24 BILLION! with a B.RayJJohnson » 12 Jun 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ The US invested billions of dollars planting trees for a sustainable cash crop over the last 60 years.
I watched an interesting documentary on my state.Sumela » 12 Jun 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ Climate change is fun!!! Its been changing constantly for BILLIONS OF YEARS![]()
There were................. FIVE ICE AGES
before man even existed. Dont panic
Yes.sootedupCyndi » 12 Jun 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I watched an interesting documentary on my state.
10,000 years ago- it was covered with ALL ice. There was no cars- nuclear power plants- probably nothing.
How in hell did it turn into a northern rainforest then?
They do NOT get it. It wasn't humans.
Beekeeper » 12 Jun 2023, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ Well, MASSIVELY MANIPULATED NARRATIVE BOY, there is ZERO EVIDENCE that "climate change" is causing any MORE or any bigger wildfires ANYWHERE in the world.
The FACTS ARE, there are fewer WILDFIRES TODAY than there were 100 years ago.
- The IPCC has not detected or attributed fire occurrence or area burned to human-caused climate change
- Globally, emissions from wildfires has decreased globally over recent decades, as well as in many regions
- Canada wildfire trends show no increase in recent decades
- Wildfires used to be much more extensive in past centuries
- Wildfires are a part of the natural eco-system.
That's the best I've ever seen New York. Perhaps if those filthy N.Y. Rodents would clean the damn trash off of their streets, sidewalks, parks, steps, gutters, etc., the city wouldn't look and smell like Mexican garbage dump.Punch » 12 Jun 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑
The future is orange and I don't mean Trump.
Orange skies are the future. Prepare yourself. (msn.com)
As climate change drives an increase in wildfires, we’re seeing more smoke lofted into the upper atmosphere each fire season. Depending on wind and weather, this smoke can spread hundreds or thousands of miles from its source—as we saw in early June on the U.S. East Coast.
And we’re likely to continue seeing it increase in severity, frequency, and longevity as the planet warms. The conditions for “smoke events” impacting major population centers become more frequent and likely each year, as climate change drives conditions—such as heat, drought, and the increasingly important vapor pressure deficit—that promote large wildfire growth.
All citizens should be heeding the words of Greta Thunberg. In a best case scenario, all of the U.S. population can expect to be wearing masks when going outdoors in 7 years.
Was in NYC last year as you know. Bakersfield CA and Los Angeles are vastly more garbage-ridden than what I saw in NYC. Was in downtown LA in Nov 2012 and there were dust-devils of trash going down the street. In NYC, there was a smell but from what I saw it is mostly due to having a more densely packed in environment and therefore more trash cans/bags out on the curb. What was the most remarkable thing about NYC was the number of folks who just walk out into traffic while never looking up.Skans » 12 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ That's the best I've ever seen New York. Perhaps if those filthy N.Y. Rodents would clean the damn trash off of their streets, sidewalks, parks, steps, gutters, etc., the city wouldn't look and smell like Mexican garbage dump.
^^^^Beekeeper » 12 Jun 2023, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ Well, MASSIVELY MANIPULATED NARRATIVE BOY, there is ZERO EVIDENCE that "climate change" is causing any MORE or any bigger wildfires ANYWHERE in the world.
The FACTS ARE, there are fewer WILDFIRES TODAY than there were 100 years ago.
- The IPCC has not detected or attributed fire occurrence or area burned to human-caused climate change
- Globally, emissions from wildfires has decreased globally over recent decades, as well as in many regions
- Canada wildfire trends show no increase in recent decades
- Wildfires used to be much more extensive in past centuries
- Wildfires are a part of the natural eco-system.
This is going to be prediction number 7,649,512. The odds against it being true are PRECISELY 7,649,512 to 1.Punch » 12 Jun 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ As climate change drives an increase in wildfires, we’re seeing more smoke lofted into the upper atmosphere each fire season. Depending on wind and weather, this smoke can spread hundreds or thousands of miles from its source—as we saw in early June on the U.S. East Coast.
And we’re likely to continue seeing it increase in severity, frequency, and longevity as the planet warms.
Not us science deniers, you stupid queer.Punch » 12 Jun 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ All citizens should be heeding the words of Greta Thunberg.
Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2023, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ This is going to be prediction number 7,649,512. The odds against it being true are PRECISELY 7,649,512 to 1.
You're gay, and you're fat, and you're stupid.
Not us science deniers, you stupid queer.
Not us science deniers. **** Professor Turdbird.
I was recently in NYC. I saw trash everywhere. They live like Filthy Pigs. As for LA - it's just as trashy. And, they have bums camping everywhere. There is this row of burned-out old RV's form the 1970's between West LA and Santa Monica. Thin wires running from some electric outlet in a storage unit to the RV's. Trash and filth piled up in each RV. Trash and filth all around the street and the RV's. Freaking twilight-zone stuff.impartialobserver » 12 Jun 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Was in NYC last year as you know. Bakersfield CA and Los Angeles are vastly more garbage-ridden than what I saw in NYC. Was in downtown LA in Nov 2012 and there were dust-devils of trash going down the street. In NYC, there was a smell but from what I saw it is mostly due to having a more densely packed in environment and therefore more trash cans/bags out on the curb. What was the most remarkable thing about NYC was the number of folks who just walk out into traffic while never looking up.