Liberal Forum

Some Republic#nts complain bitterly about the military... but you'll notice that when Republic#nts complain about the military it's RARELY about all the mass murder, thievery, mayhem, etc., they do... IT'S ABOUT GAYS IN THE MILITARY, etc.!!!!    

#republic#ntpiecesof$hit[allmonetaryignoramuses]

       
 
 

There was a guy looking for the perfect girl to marry.
He took one out and they got to the moment of carnal knowledge and he asked her is she knew what this is(pointing to dick).
She said sure, it's a penis.
Guy thought that's nice, but a little to naive.
Next girl, same situation and question.
She said that's a peepee.
He said no, that's a dick, thinking she might be a little naive and young also.
She said no, a dick is about a foot long and black!

Moral of story; if you ain't big enough to be recognized, you're a peepee.

sunburn » 14 Jun 2023, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 7:07 am

I was once a queer guy looking for the perfect man to marry but I've changed and now all I want is to bugger children. 

 

poor LITTLE peepee, has to resort to changing quotes. just proves the moral.

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 7:14 am

Can you show us the list of Republicans that complain about the military..?

I'm interested what they said

 

...dumb@ss, i believe you'll find a large % of your fellow $hit-puppet-sucking republic#nt monetary ignoramuses here would like to ban gays in the military... DUUUUUUUUUUUUH!...    
 

sunburn » 14 Jun 2023, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 7:17 am

My poor LITTLE peepee!! I have to resort to putting a plastic banana in my pants!

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 7:39 am

Can you just show us the list ?

...righteous, fjb, sheepbleeper, marco rubio, andonandonandon....       
 

...this from the Texas Republic#nt platform: 

155. Homosexuality: Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin, and we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. No one should be granted special legal status based on their LGBTQ+ identification.

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 8:03 am

What did they say?

     

...they've said they don't like homosexuals many times and in many ways, you lame f@cking fool!..   

...you trifling, stoooooooooooooopid motherf@ckers snarl at gays as you suck bankster    c@ck in ignorance!   

 

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 8:06 am

Why should anyone get treated special for being gay?

...[i wish this ^^^ brain-laundered, $hit-puppet-sucking fool cared as much about THE MONEY/THE BANKSTERS as he does about THE GAYS]    

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 8:10 am

What exactly did they say?

(((((I JUST POSTED THE WORDS OF YOUR FELLOW TEXAS REPUBLIC#NTS, YOU BLATHERING @SSHOLE)))))... [and monetary ignoramus] 


       
 

sunburn » 14 Jun 2023, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 7:07 am

There was a guy looking for the perfect girl to marry.
He took one out and they got to the moment of carnal knowledge and he asked her is she knew what this is(pointing to dick).
She said sure, it's a penis.
Guy thought that's nice, but a little to naive.
Next girl, same situation and question.
She said that's a peepee.
He said no, that's a dick, thinking she might be a little naive and young also.
She said no, a dick is about a foot long and black!

Moral of story; if you ain't big enough to be recognized, you're a peepee.

     
 

What is this peepee guy's damage? At least Sumela knows how to troll. Peepee is just plain cringe.

RayJJohnson » 14 Jun 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 9:17 am

What is this peepee guy's damage? At least Sumela knows how to troll. Peepee is just plain cringe.

     

[apparently this ^^^ $hit-puppet-sucking republic#nt monetary ignoramus/tranny bathroom expert hasn't noticed that sumela sucks some republic#nt cack too!]        

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 8:29 am

I read that...

What special entitlements should gay people have....??

Just tell us

CAN'T YOU READ, REPUBLIC#NT?   https://newrepublic.com/post/169392/ful ... x-marriage

Here are the representatives who voted Thursday against the Respect for Marriage Act, which protects same-sex and interracial marriage. All 169 are Republicans.

1. Robert Aderholt
2. Rick Allen
3. Mark Amodei
4. Jodey Arrington
5. Brian Babin
6. Jim Baird
7. Troy Balderson
8. Jim Banks
9. Andy Barr
10. Cliff Bentz
11. Jack Berman
12. Stephanie Bice
13. Andy Biggs
14. Gus Bilirakis
15. Dan Bishop
16. Lauren Boebert
17. Mike Bost
18. Mo Brooks
19. Vern Buchanan
20. Ken Buck
21. Larry Bucshon
22. Ted Budd
23. Tim Burchett
24. Michael Burgess
25. Jerry Carl
26. Buddy Carter
27. John Carter
28. Madison Cawthorn
29. Stave Chabot
30. Ben Cline
31. Michael Cloud
32. Andrew Clyde
33. Tom Cole
34. James Comer
35. Connie Conway
36. Rick Crawford
37. Dan Crenshaw
38. Warren Davidson
39. Scott DesJarlais
40. Mario Diaz-Balart
41. Byron Donalds
42. Jeff Duncan
43. Neal Dunn
44. Jake Ellzey
45. Ron Estes
46. Pat Fallon
47. Randy Feenstra
48. Drew Ferguson
49. Brad Finstad
50. Michelle Fischbach
51. Scott Fitzgerald
52. Chuck Fleischmann
53. Mike Flood
54. Mayra Flores
55. Virginia Foxx
56. Scott Franklin
57. Russ Fulcher
58. Matt Gaetz
59. Bob Gibbs
60. Louie Gohmert
61. Bob Good
62. Lance Gooden
63. Paul Gosar
64. Kay Granger
65. Garret Graves
66. Sam Graves
67. Mark Green
68. Marjorie Taylor Greene
69. Morgan Griffith
70. Glenn Grothman
71. Michael Guest
72. Brett Guthrie
73. Andy Harris
74. Diana Harshbarger
75. Vicky Hartzler
76. Kevin Hern
77. Yvette Herrell
78. Jody Hice
79. Clay Higgins
80. French Hill
81. Richard Hudson
82. Bill Huizenga
83. Ronny Jackson
84. Bill Johnson
85. Dusty Johnson
86. Mike Johnson
87. Jim Jordan
88. David Joyce
89. Fred Keller
90. Mike Kelly
91. Trent Kelly
92. Young Kim
93. David Kustoff
94. Darin LaHood
95. Doug LaMalfa
96. Doug Lamborn
97. Bob Latta
98. Jake LaTurner
99. Debbie Lesko
100. Julia Letlow
101. Billy Long
102. Barry Loudermilk
103. Frank Lucas
104. Blaine Luetkemeyer
105. Tracey Mann
106. Thomas Massie
107. Brian Mast
108. Kevin McCarthy
109. Michael McCaul
110. Lisa McClain
111. Tom McClintock
112. Patrick McHenry
113. David McKinley
114. Cathy McMorris Rodgers
115. Dan Meuser
116. Carol Miller
117. Mary Miller
118. John Moolenaar
119. Alex Mooney
120. Barry Moore
121. Markwayne Mullin
122. Greg Murphy
123. Troy Nehls
124. Ralph Norman
125. Steven Palazzo
126. Gary Palmer
127. Greg Pence
128. Scott Perry
129. August Pfluger
130. Bill Posey
131. Guy Reschenthaler
132. Hal Rogers
133. Mike Rogers
134. John Rose
135. Matt Rosendale
136. David Rouzer
137. Chip Roy
138. John Rutherford
139. Maria Salazar
140. Steve Scalise
141. David Schweikert
142. Austin Scott
143. Joe Sempolinski
144. Pete Sessions
145. Adrian Smith
146. Chris Smith
147. Jason Smith
148. Lloyd Smucker
149. Victoria Sparts
150. Pete Stauber
151. Michelle Steel
152. Greg Steube
153. Van Taylor
154. Claudia Tenney
155. Glenn Thompson
156. Tom Tiffany
157. William Timmons
158. Jefferson Van Drew
159. Beth Van Duyne
160. Tim Walberg
161. Randy Weber
162. Daniel Webster
163. Brad Wenstrup
164. Bruce Westerman
165. Roger Williams
166. Joe Wilson
167. Rob Wittman
168. Steve Womack
169. Rudy Yakym

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 12:40 pm

And did you read what special entitlements that gay people wanted?

Did you?

...they wanted equal treatment, you stooooooooopid $hit-puppet-sucking Republic#nt..... [and monetary ignoramus]   

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm

Did I read the bill peewee?

Maybe I should

"The Respect for Marriage Act will now go to President Joe Biden to be signed into law. The bill, which applies to both same-sex and interracial marriage, would require that two people be considered married so long as their marriage was legal in the state in which it was performed. The act also repeals a 1996 law defining marriage as between a man and a woman, which has remained on the books despite being declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2015."
 

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm

No kid..

You're missing some of the fine print ..

How convenient of you

...let's see 'the fine print', Republic#nt!... 

peepee » 14 Jun 2023, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 9:23 am

     

[apparently this ^^^ $hit-puppet-sucking republic#nt monetary ignoramus/tranny bathroom expert hasn't noticed that sumela sucks some republic#nt cack too!]      

Too many symbols and other stuff in your post here. Can't read it. 

Z09 » 14 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm

No kid..

You're missing some of the fine print ..

How convenient of you

...(((((((LET'S SEE THE 'IMPORTANT' 'FINE PRINT' ABOUT WHICH YOU WORK YOUR    HOLE!)))))))