
And if you don't enthusiastically support this then you are advocating for the genocide of an oppressed people and are no better than Hitler himself.Punch » 14 Jun 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑
Ah, young love...
Your insurance rates are going up because Dems want you to pay for homos and trannies having surrogate babies. LOL.
CA Senate passes bill to redefine same-sex couples unable to get pregnant as 'infertile' (msn.com)
Democratic lawmakers are attempting to force insurance companies to pay for pregnancy treatments for homosexual couples in California by redefining "infertility" to include couples who cannot reproduce because they have a partner of the same sex.SB-729 would add to sections of the state's current Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code so that same-sex couples unable to reproduce together would be considered "infertile," and insurance companies would be required to cover costs for treatments such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surrogacy.
IVF treatments include costly procedures like "ultrasounds, blood tests, egg retrieval, lab fees, embryo transfer, cryopreservation of viable embryos and one year of embryo storage fees,." The average cost for in vitro treatment is between $8,000 to $13,000 for one cycle, not including medication.If passed, the bill would cover costs for surrogacy, which is a much more expensive treatment that averages anywhere from $14,000 to $46,000.The legislation "will ensure that queer couples no longer have to pay more out of pocket to start families than non-queer families."
Of course it's California... I should know better but when I see stuff like that I still wonder... wtf is wrong with those people???Punch » 14 Jun 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑
Ah, young love...
Your insurance rates are going up because Dems want you to pay for homos and trannies having surrogate babies. LOL.
CA Senate passes bill to redefine same-sex couples unable to get pregnant as 'infertile' (msn.com)
Democratic lawmakers are attempting to force insurance companies to pay for pregnancy treatments for homosexual couples in California by redefining "infertility" to include couples who cannot reproduce because they have a partner of the same sex.SB-729 would add to sections of the state's current Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code so that same-sex couples unable to reproduce together would be considered "infertile," and insurance companies would be required to cover costs for treatments such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surrogacy.
IVF treatments include costly procedures like "ultrasounds, blood tests, egg retrieval, lab fees, embryo transfer, cryopreservation of viable embryos and one year of embryo storage fees,." The average cost for in vitro treatment is between $8,000 to $13,000 for one cycle, not including medication.If passed, the bill would cover costs for surrogacy, which is a much more expensive treatment that averages anywhere from $14,000 to $46,000.The legislation "will ensure that queer couples no longer have to pay more out of pocket to start families than non-queer families."
Punch » 14 Jun 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑
Ah, young love...
Your insurance rates are going up because Dems want you to pay for homos and trannies having surrogate babies. LOL.
CA Senate passes bill to redefine same-sex couples unable to get pregnant as 'infertile' (msn.com)
Democratic lawmakers are attempting to force insurance companies to pay for pregnancy treatments for homosexual couples in California by redefining "infertility" to include couples who cannot reproduce because they have a partner of the same sex.SB-729 would add to sections of the state's current Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code so that same-sex couples unable to reproduce together would be considered "infertile," and insurance companies would be required to cover costs for treatments such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surrogacy.
IVF treatments include costly procedures like "ultrasounds, blood tests, egg retrieval, lab fees, embryo transfer, cryopreservation of viable embryos and one year of embryo storage fees,." The average cost for in vitro treatment is between $8,000 to $13,000 for one cycle, not including medication.If passed, the bill would cover costs for surrogacy, which is a much more expensive treatment that averages anywhere from $14,000 to $46,000.The legislation "will ensure that queer couples no longer have to pay more out of pocket to start families than non-queer families."
compounding bad ideas again doesn't correct the original bad idea.Punch » 14 Jun 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑
Ah, young love...
Your insurance rates are going up because Dems want you to pay for homos and trannies having surrogate babies. LOL.
CA Senate passes bill to redefine same-sex couples unable to get pregnant as 'infertile' (msn.com)
Democratic lawmakers are attempting to force insurance companies to pay for pregnancy treatments for homosexual couples in California by redefining "infertility" to include couples who cannot reproduce because they have a partner of the same sex.SB-729 would add to sections of the state's current Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code so that same-sex couples unable to reproduce together would be considered "infertile," and insurance companies would be required to cover costs for treatments such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surrogacy.
IVF treatments include costly procedures like "ultrasounds, blood tests, egg retrieval, lab fees, embryo transfer, cryopreservation of viable embryos and one year of embryo storage fees,." The average cost for in vitro treatment is between $8,000 to $13,000 for one cycle, not including medication.If passed, the bill would cover costs for surrogacy, which is a much more expensive treatment that averages anywhere from $14,000 to $46,000.The legislation "will ensure that queer couples no longer have to pay more out of pocket to start families than non-queer families."
RedheadedStranger » 15 Jun 2023, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ And if you don't enthusiastically support this then you are advocating for the genocide of an oppressed people and are no better than Hitler himself.
Everything...Jantje_Smit » 15 Jun 2023, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑ Of course it's California... I should know better but when I see stuff like that I still wonder... wtf is wrong with those people???
![]()
https://youtu.be/GHt1CsdSVfo
What a cute couple.....too bad for the kids, they'll never experience a normal childhood.
i know growing up in the White House but they look like they are mixed race so they have that challengeRebelGator » 15 Jun 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ What a cute couple.....too bad for the kids, they'll never experience a normal childhood.
You're right... I don't know why I thought it couldn't get any better.. more insane.. lol.. but of course I was wrong... drag nuns.. wtf???..

It sure ain't "sterile".BuckNaked » 15 Jun 2023, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑ Yes breeding using the pooper shooter makes one infertile
They must be sitting on the precipice of their ESG score....glad to see no one came to see the freak show....Jantje_Smit » 17 Jun 2023, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ You're right... I don't know why I thought it couldn't get any better.. more insane.. lol.. but of course I was wrong... drag nuns.. wtf???..
https://youtu.be/s7NzyAzMFoI
a digit in the grommet feels nice