Liberal Forum

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

walkingstick » 18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

Happens in an anti all creation dictatorial eugenics feudal monarchy,  people growing toxic food making millions.

I have gold-silver, you have gold silver, we do not have any mandatory contracts, goodbye.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQjw5F6SnzE
 

walkingstick » 18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

Divide and conquer your own species by selling ideas life isn't self evident for each reproduciton present spontaneously evolving since conceived to replace their previous 30 DNA donors.

Your mind operates by liner programming of how evolving should happen with organized relative time data com-pairing total sum past against the behavior of each ancestor added forward left evolving here now.

the haves and haven't among those that have become parents and those that never did. Adapt or become extinct rules since conceived to replace one's own 30 DNA donors. 16. 8. 4. 2 delivering them into occupying time inhabiting space as one of a kind. Each might become 50% parents, may become 25% grandparents, chance of becoming 25% great grandparents, 6.25% great grandparent 4 generations after their arrival replacing their own previous 4 DNA donors.

Guess why no two ancestors of any species native to this atmosphere were ever reproductively added again?

Orchestrating two sided debates among ancestries serving idealists promising better tomorrows than genetics sustains the current numbers alive.

In reality, nobody but me holds this truth to be genetically self evident.

walkingstick » 18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

that’s unconstitutional 

walkingstick » 18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

Danke, Herr Adolph!

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Jun 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2023, 8:24 am

Child rape is acceptable.  

As kids are not fully human yet.
 

   

walkingstick » 18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2023, 2:44 am

control the undesirables, and you do not need the cost of police protection. /// require all undesirables to wear arm bands. restrict them to undesirable areas. build fences around the undesirable areas. do not allow good people to enter undesirable areas. give the undesirable the right to rob, rape and kill each other. but not in the good peoples areas.

There are probably multiple constitutional issues with your proposal, but it might be worth discussing.  However, some will be confused by you using "undesirables" rather than "liberals".