TEAM SMITH HAD UNETHICAL PAST

User avatar
By righteous
18 Jun 2023 12:56 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
righteous
18 Jun 2023 12:56 pm
User avatar
      
9,833 posts
Karen Gilbert, who is currently playing a key role on Special Counsel Jack Smith's team, was required to step down as the head of the narcotics division in the Miami U.S. Attorney's office due to her involvement in illegally wiretapping a defense attorney in 2009, according to court documents.

Gilbert and her colleague Sean Cronin suspected the defense of witness tampering. They then decided to wiretap Shaygan's lawyer without approval from the local U.S. Attorney at the time, R. Alexander Acosta. Despite Gilbert's efforts to throw ethics, the wiretap ended up providing no useful information. 

"I have no reason to believe that she will behave ethically in any circumstance," Shaygan said. "I do not find it appropriate for her to still be employed by the Department of Justice. She was a sorry sack of lies."

As a result, U.S. District Judge Alan Gold ordered the government to pay $601,795 in legal fees to Shaygan.




Top Prosecutor in Trump Case Had Unethical Past, Court Records Show | Newsmax.com
User avatar
Cannonpointer
18 Jun 2023 2:02 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,711 posts
Oh damn!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
18 Jun 2023 2:11 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
You are referring to guilt by association.
Silly and also, lame.
User avatar
righteous
18 Jun 2023 7:00 pm
User avatar
      
9,833 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 18 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: You are referring to guilt by association.
Silly and also, lame.
NO. I'M REFERRING TO AN UNETHICAL ASSHOLE WORKING ON A CASE WITH THE OTHER ASSHOLE, SMITH 
 
4 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 4877 users online :: 11 registered, 19 bots, and 4847 guests
Bots: Adsbot, okhttp, MicroMessenger, Pinterest, proximic, Feeder, Not, CriteoBot, YandexBot, ADmantX, Mediatoolkitbot, Googlebot, NING, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Baiduspider
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search