The latest I have read said that they lost all contact at 3000 meters down, which was about 600 meters shy of the Titanic. They were just a tad over 3/4 the way down when the crush hit.roadkill » 22 Jun 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ They lost communication with the Titan sub after it imploded.
Probably hit a piece of the Titanic on the ocean floor which compromised the sub hull and it collapsed and it was over at that instance.
RedheadedStranger » 23 Jun 2023, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ The latest I have read said that they lost all contact at 3000 meters down, which was about 600 meters shy of the Titanic. They were just a tad over 3/4 the way down when the crush hit.
Also, people knowledgeable in the field said that at that depth, the implosion would have happened so rapidly that the human brain wouldn't have even had time to process what was happening so, most likely the people in the sub never knew what hit them. The time from breach to crush would have been literal milliseconds.
Fox interviewed some guy. That had been down there many times. In a better craft.
I'm guessing they never even reached the bottom before imploding....roadkill » 22 Jun 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ They lost communication with the Titan sub after it imploded.
Probably hit a piece of the Titanic on the ocean floor which compromised the sub hull and it collapsed and it was over at that instance.
You understand how airliners have to be inspected regularly for stress cracks being pressurized flying 30.000 ft above sea level. Doesn't the same precautions be necessary going 10,000 deep.roadkill » 22 Jun 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ They lost communication with the Titan sub after it imploded.
Probably hit a piece of the Titanic on the ocean floor which compromised the sub hull and it collapsed and it was over at that instance.
An expert said after all the decades they've gone deep it's the first time something like this has happened. It looks like negligence was the cause.Nostradamus'omh » 24 Jun 2023, 4:15 am » wrote: ↑ You understand how airliners have to be inspected regularly for stress cracks being pressurized flying 30.000 ft above sea level. Doesn't the same precautions be necessary going 10,000 deep.
This whole situation was about making a buck from people foolish enough to want to risk going where no human belongs going. Making an issue out of this is stupid as stupid has become.
This is no different than planning to colonize Mars. really dumb ideas by people ignoring how evolving lasts in the balance of where living happens naturally.
Kobia2 » 24 Jun 2023, 12:53 am » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing they never even reached the bottom before imploding....
They're saying debris from the Sub was located 1600 feet from the Bow section of the Titanic.... One piece of information comes from the Navy who reported after checking Audio Data from their 'Acoustic Detection System", there was an anomaly consistent with an implosion / explosion in the general area of where the Sub was, at the same time communications were lost --- if this is correct, the Sub was still descending and hadn't reached bottom yet...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 62957.html
A senior US Navy official has since revealed that, after the Titan was first reported missing on Sunday, its analysts went back and checked their audio data from a top-secret acoustic detection system and found an “anomaly”. That was consistent with an implosion or explosion in the general vicinity of where the vessel was operating when communications were lost.
Sounds like Morgan and Morgan lawyer talk for pending lawsuits. Oh that's right, that law firm is "for the people.".roadkill » 24 Jun 2023, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ An expert said after all the decades they've gone deep it's the first time something like this has happened. It looks like negligence was the cause.