PETER SCHWEIZER: It's interesting, what is the line of communications between Hunter Biden and his business partners and Joe Biden when he's vice president of the United States? It's not the government phone, it's not Joe Biden's personal phone. We know from the laptop that Hunter Biden's business paid for a private phone line that Joe Biden used while he was vice president. It was from AT&T, it was $300 a month, it was a global phone where you could access somebody anywhere around the world.
We shared that phone number and that account information with people in the House Oversight Committee. My hope is that they if they haven't already, they will subpoena those records because I think it will give an indication on how tight the communication was.
And that may be the phone, for example, that the Ukrainian, the Burisma executive might have used in this allegation that the he talked to Joe Biden in recorded conversations.
I would just say one other thing, Maria, as it relates to that sort of shakedown phone call with Henry Zhao that we alluded to, Henry Zhao in 2015 had already sent $5 million to the Bidens. He was the head of a Harvest Investment firm. And what's interesting is in the correspondence there, Hunter Biden again talks to Zhao in the context of "this is a deal that's important to my family" involving his father.
Let's also keep in mind, we fixate on the criminal element of this, we also have to focus on the espionage element of this. Henry Zhao paid $5 million to Hunter Biden from an account that was part of a company that he co-owned with the family of the Minister of State Security of China, who's in charge of the entire spy apparatus. And you see that in every deal that Hunter Biden did in China. These individuals that are sending him money have ties to Chinese intelligence.
Doesn't matter. ALL Text messages are on the Providers servers and so are the inbound and outbound numbers called and received.
good luck getting them and proving laws were brokenBeekeeper » 26 Jun 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter. ALL Text messages are on the Providers servers and so are the inbound and outbound numbers called and received.
That's always the problem. Where are The Untouchables when you need them?
She sat on it?
You ever going to learn nobody wins in a rigged debate or outcome to evolving in plain sight saving each reality dividing this species from separate ancestries to people defending ideas until extinction happens?golfboy » 25 Jun 2023, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Pelosi set the precedent to obtain phone records from ATT.
Guess we should see who VP Joe was calling on his private phone, that he didn't want anyone to know about.
got to have someone interested in fetching those texts and then WILLING to prosecute instead of hiding them to do any good.Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter. ALL Text messages are on the Providers servers and so are the inbound and outbound numbers called and received.
Deniers always take ethics seriously because they know there is no honor among thieves robbing ancestors cradle to grave every generation gap forward of their natural time being alive now.neue regel » 27 Jun 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ But, the Biden administration said they take ethics very seriously.
It is when everyone else has to pay for it out of taxes designed to serve the citizens paying them. Doing other wise becomes taxation without representation again.Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jun 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ It is not illegal to provide anyone else with a cell phone.
Just another brick in the wall.... nothing to see hereXavier_Onassis » 27 Jun 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ It is not illegal to provide anyone else with a cell phone.
Idiot.Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jun 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ It is not illegal to provide anyone else with a cell phone.
No, it's not.Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jun 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ It is not illegal to provide anyone else with a cell phone.
hey dipstick, you mean each representative on the federal level doesn't have one given to them that goes with the office after elected to represent their voters globally on the economic marketplace?golfboy » 27 Jun 2023, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it's not.
But why did Joe need a global cell phone, and why did Hunter pay for it, instead of Joe?
And best of all, now we can subpoena those phone records to see who Joe was talking to. Thanks to Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff.
Xavier_Onassis » 27 Jun 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ It is not illegal or uncommon to provide anyone else with a cell phone
to call people and demand they send you $MILLIONS.