Liberal Forum

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:24 pm

it would reinforce my belief in karma and reaffirm my belief that it is possible to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and end up getting screwed for it.

Ashlii Babbitt being a prime example.

Then why would I accept your challenge, retard?

When you challenge someone to prove a thing, you are IMPLYING it is a thing that matters to you - which is what I INFER.

But knowing you for a braying *** producing meaningless jabber, I demanded to know what difference it would make - and exposed your implicit lie, precisely as I expected. 
 

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:26 pm

You obviously can infer something that was not implied.

Hey, you're getting the hang of English, moron. Don't ya love hasty googles?

In this case, I proved you implied it - but yes, one CAN infer that which was NOT implied. 
 
 

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:23 pm

If you would give me a link that shows that people were arrested for "urging someone to do something in the future" in connection with the January 6th Insurrection and give me the USCode section under which they were charged, that would allow me to go read that section and see for myself if that particular section of the law states that "urging someone to do something in the future" is a violation of that law.

We've well estabished your level of rigor with yourself, Groomer.

I'll not be providing you with further proofs, now that you have admitted that if I prove people were arrested merely for going in (the thing Epps urged, giving his agitating for revolution the most GENEROUS light), you would not change your narrative. 
 
Giving you another reason to make dishonest excuses and move more goalposts does not interest me. 

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:31 pm

Then why would I accept your challenge, retard?

When you challenge someone to prove a thing, you are IMPLYING it is a thing that matters to you - which is what I INFER.

But knowing you for a braying *** producing meaningless jabber, I demanded to know what difference it would make - and exposed your implicit lie, precisely as I expected.

I just don't believe you and asked you to show me where people were arrested who did nothing and broke no laws  If you can't, or won't... macht nichts

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:32 pm

Hey, you're getting the hang of English, moron. Don't ya love hasty googles?

In this case, I proved you implied it - but yes, one CAN infer that which was NOT implied.

you can infer that I implied it.  Your inference is not accurate.  

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 3:35 pm

We've well estabished your level of rigor with yourself, Groomer.

I'll not be providing you with further proofs, now that you have admitted that if I prove people were arrested merely for going in (the thing Epps urged, giving his agitating for revolution the most GENEROUS light), you would not change your narrative. 
 
Giving you another reason to make dishonest excuses and move more goalposts does not interest me.

All any such links would establish would be the fact that judgments were made by LEO's and prosecutors as to who would be arrested and who would not.  Look at the video of the giant crowd pressing against the doorway of the capitol, scaling the face of the building, beating LEO's with pikes, smashing doors and windows... there were THOUSANDS of people in that crowd.  Now, if Ray Epps were the ONLY guy NOT to be arrested, you might have some point, but only a minute percentage of that mob was charged with any crimes.  MOST escaped any sort of punishment.  Epps was apparently in that group.   Lucky him.  And when and if he wins his lawsuit against Faux News, lucky him TWICE!

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm

I just don't believe you 

I don't mind being disbelieved by a jabbering groomer.

I feel no compunction to prove anything to a dishonest person who will only turn the proof into an opportunity to gay me. 
 

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm

All any such links would establish would be the fact that judgments were made by LEO's and prosecutors as to who would be arrested and who would not. 

It's all they would prove to YOU. But you've demonstrated that your reasoning is affected by your agenda. 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:18 pm

It's all they would prove to YOU. But you've demonstrated that your reasoning is affected by your agenda.

and to you, of course, it would be confirmation of the fact that Q was right all along and the deep state is drinking baby blood.

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:17 pm

I don't mind being disbelieved by a jabbering groomer.

I feel no compunction to prove anything to a dishonest person who will only turn the proof into an opportunity to gay me.

I don't "gay" on anyone.  I am not sure what that word even means as a verb.

 

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:18 pm

It's all they would prove to YOU. But you've demonstrated that your reasoning is affected by your agenda.

and you really remind me of brain-damaged aphasic golfboy... you only quote the first sentence of my posts... I guess I should do the same to you.

HillaryClinton » 14 Jul 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 11:51 am

It would be suicide. 

I consider you a contemporary expert on suicide and suiciding.

razoo » 13 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm

it was all over the wide screen for the world to see that the fake fascist republican party has been trying to steal the election beginning on Jan 6th Insurrection day............still after nearly two years we find that if any one was committing election fraud it is the Fake Fascist Republican Party..............

Right Wing Watch
http://www.pfaw.org/rww-in-focus/alec-t ... ures#Voter

 

ROG62 » 14 Jul 2023, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 5:26 pm

Can you honestly say that you applauded the actions of the people who smashed their way into our nation's capitol on January 6th seeking to lynch the vice president?  Did you really think that was an appropriate response to losing an election?

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm

Can you honestly say that you applauded the actions of the people who smashed their way into our nation's capitol on January 6th seeking to lynch the vice president?  Did you really think that was an appropriate response to losing an election?

ask the FBI, they started it.

maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm

All any such links would establish would be the fact that judgments were made by LEO's and prosecutors as to who would be arrested and who would not.  Look at the video of the giant crowd pressing against the doorway of the capitol, scaling the face of the building, beating LEO's with pikes, smashing doors and windows... there were THOUSANDS of people in that crowd.  Now, if Ray Epps were the ONLY guy NOT to be arrested, you might have some point, but only a minute percentage of that mob was charged with any crimes.  MOST escaped any sort of punishment.  Epps was apparently in that group.   Lucky him.  And when and if he wins his lawsuit against Faux News, lucky him TWICE!

only because they didn't identify them.

Ray Epps was know real soon.
minute....1000 last I heard.
 

sunburn » 14 Jul 2023, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 8:01 pm

ask the FBI, they started it.

cool story, bro!

got ANY proof?

 

sunburn » 14 Jul 2023, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2023, 8:04 pm

only because they didn't identify them.

Ray Epps was know real soon.
minute....1000 last I heard.

it was a really big crowd.  

DEMS and THE DC ESTABLISHMENT ruined the public trust in elections in

2016 with the crazed Russia-Hoax hysteria.

From now on every election will be distrusted.

America is now a Banana Republic....thanks!

Nothing but pure unadulterated BS ......