who said I applauded? As I told you before, I have a different viewpoint of the election..like JFK, we'll never know the real truth...both sides are guilty, however the party in power has the last say...maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you honestly say that you applauded the actions of the people who smashed their way into our nation's capitol on January 6th seeking to lynch the vice president? Did you really think that was an appropriate response to losing an election?
I don'tknow anything about Q - I leave the fringe garbage to **** asses like yourself, fruitcake.maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ and to you, of course, it would be confirmation of the fact that Q was right all along and the deep state is drinking baby blood.
I never said anything about gaying ON me, you gaying ***.maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't "gay" on[SIC] anyone. I am not sure what that word even means as a verb.
Do what you like, homo.My operative practice is to stop people at their first lie.maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ and you really remind me of brain-damaged aphasic golfboy... you only quote the first sentence of my posts... I guess I should do the same to you.
Too late for that now but this is also an option...
only if libtardoville admits they fabricated the ruse...
What, then, will it take to recover from the failed insurrection of January 6th?
Opposition Research is not a ruse.
Two points:
what will it take to recover from a successful coup?maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ What, then, will it take to recover from the failed insurrection of January 6th?
depends upon who is funding and finalizing report...
we've never had one.
What happens when you go looking for one thing and find another?
Well, thatll never happen.
One "Official" coup...
are you surprised Russia, or China or any other country with capabilities attempts to interfere with our elections? I guess it's a "do as we say and not as we do" situation as our own CIA has been doing it since their inception...and then we have the Democratic Party...maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ What happens when you go looking for one thing and find another?
Democrats went looking for dirt on Trump, they found, instead, evidence of covert Russian involvement in our election process and it appeared that the involvement was focused on trying to increase Trump's chances of winning.
Mueller was tasked, by Trump's own DOJ, to investigate that Russian interference. Volume One of his report details the evidence they found - and it was myriad. Volume Two details the efforts taken by the Trump campaign to hamper their investigation.
I realize that lots of talking heads and Democratic candidates and politicians were talking about "collusion", but that was not what Mueller was tasked to investigate, and the fact that he did not find any collusion is not proof that Russia did not meddle with our 2016 election on Trump's behalf... nor is it proof that Trump's campaign organization did not attempt to obstruct the investigation into that meddling.