right! and the tooth fairy still gives you money.maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ we didn't cheat. Every ballot was submitted by a registered voter. If you can't figure out how to adjust your GOTV strategy in the midst of a pandemic, that's your problem
Pretty sure that losing 3/4 of a billion dollars (if memory serves) goes in the loss column.Majik » 15 Jul 2023, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ Wrong again.... ...
Fox settled and lost no money over the settlement because it was written off against their massive profit .....and has not hurt Fox financially what so ever....
keep whining. it only serves to emphasize your pathos.
It hurt fox's stock value by a drop of 13 cents...which is nothing...maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Here you go: I'll just write you a check for three quarters of a BILLION dollars. That won't hurt a BIT!!!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, you are going to Bob and weave ...huh?
I'M not defending fox ...Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Pretty sure that losing 3/4 of a billion dollars (if memory serves) goes in the loss column.
It hurts - measurably. The precise measure of the pain is 3/4 of a billion dollars.
Here, do this: Pretend for a moment that CNN got gut-hooked for 3/4 of a billion.
See that?
This is the part I have trouble with.Majik » 15 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I'M not defending fox ...
just pointing out that they had 4 billion in reserve Cash and that that a 3/4 of a billion loss would actually help them in the long run ....
and not hurt them very much ...
and it hasn't ....
In my estimation, they've ALWAYS been in line. When it was their turn to push war, they pushed war. When it is their turn to question war, they question war. But not very **** hard. Not stridently. Not powerfully. Not effectively.Majik » 15 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ what did hurt them was firing Tucker and falling into line as well as coming under the umbrella of all the other obedient MSM like CNN....
Oh, pshaw.DeezerShoove » 14 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I consider you a contemporary expert on suicide and suiciding.
He's not here. I'm asking the guy who is clowning for him.
Well, that could be construed as a lynch mob then...
seems to me you're the **** clown for thinking that anyone else can discern the rationale behind someone else's opinion.HillaryClinton » 15 Jul 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ He's not here. I'm asking the guy who is clowning for him.
Here's the deal: I read the report... YEARS AGO. I READ what evidence Mueller presented... YEARS AGO. It was and is a matter of public record. I am not going to go back and open up my Mueller Report file just to prove to you something I already know to be true. I don't have to PROVE anything to you. Whether or not you believe me is of ZERO consequence to me. You're a MAGAt. You're a domestic enemy... you're MY enemy.Majik » 15 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑ So, you are going to Bob and weave ...huh?
provide the forensic evidence that the intel agencies provided and was contained in the Mueller report....
oops...
Once again they did not provide any ....and neither did Mueller ....
and if I am wrong provide evidence to the contrary .....
but you can't because there wasn't....
hell, you can't even provide one single example of how Russia interfered from your own personal standpoint ......
maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ seems to me you're the **** clown for thinking that anyone else can discern the rationale behind someone else's opinion.
can YOU see the zero **** I am giving?
You are going to sit there and tell me that Fox welcomed the settlement and that it was good for their bottom line? Seriously?Majik » 15 Jul 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ It hurt fox's stock value by a drop of 13 cents...which is nothing...
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04 ... -tax-break
Also fox will be able to write off the loss as a business expense as well as other things .....
they had 4 billion in cash and needed the many write offs that will be forthcoming....
oops.
Not to worry!
Oh, believe me... I would never spend a nanosecond worrying about you.
Seems to me you're the clown for defending **** and then running from questions about how you predicate your defense.maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ seems to me you're the **** clown for thinking that anyone else can discern the rationale behind someone else's opinion.
Yes, we see the pattern.maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's the deal: I read the report... YEARS AGO. I READ what evidence Mueller presented... YEARS AGO. It was and is a matter of public record. I am not going to go back and open up my Mueller Report file just to prove to you something I already know to be true. I don't have to PROVE anything to you. Whether or not you believe me is of ZERO consequence to me. You're a MAGAt. You're a domestic enemy... you're MY enemy.
No, Pook.