There was no evidence of any cheating whatsoever. Every mail-in ballot counted came from a registered voter. And you keep ignoring the fact that NOTHING prevented Republicans from urging their voters to use mail-in ballots rather than risk COVID to vote on election day. In fact, even the clown himself voted by mail and now wants Republicans to vote that way in 2024.sunburn » 16 Jul 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ millions of people think you(Demonrat) planned it, or like you say, used Covid for your cover.
mail in voting has been known for eons is the easiest way to cheat and as a dorky
Demonrat said, "Never let a crisis go to waste" or something to that affect.[sic]
covid, with all its many faceted cover--mail in ballots.- media almost completely with you - time to cheat; It's now or never or death.
They have chronicled thousands of dead people casting ballots, there's goes your fictional story, fact checked on the first page.maineman » 16 Jul 2023, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ "End of STORY", with the emphasis on "story". Mail-in ballots were the totally legitimate way we WON the election. NOTHING prevented your party from getting YOUR voters to mail their ballots in as well. You were just too lazy and stupid to pivot. You cannot point to ANY mail-in ballot that was a duplicate ballot cast by a voter who had cast another. NOT ONE. You make up that fiction because you don't have the character or the integrity to accept defeat and move on. Coward. ******. Traitor.
1. fact checked????? BY WHOM????RebelGator » 16 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ They have chronicled thousands of dead people casting ballots, there's goes your fictional story, fact checked on the first page.
That's a poor argument you make......your side cheats better.
yup republicans must master ballot harvestingmaineman » 16 Jul 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ They will in the future. Like I said... well-meaning public officials worried about a public health emergency overstepped their authority, and their missteps have been corrected. Those missteps did NOT explicitly favor one party over the other. The Democrats were simply more agile and worked harder at their GOTV efforts changing their procedures to repeatedly stress to THEIR supporters that they needed to apply for mail-in ballots, fill in the applications, send the applications in, then fill out the ballot itself when it arrived back in the mail and get it BACK into the mail. The party held every supporters hands throughout that process and it worked. You lost and the evidence is abundant as to exactly HOW you lost and WHY you lost. You were lazy and did not adapt your GOTV efforts (which, I have to say, have always been spotty pandemic or not) to deal with voting in the midst of a deadly pandemic for which there was not yet a vaccine.
there wasn't a vaccine in the run-up to the election.BuckNaked » 16 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ yup republicans must master ballot harvesting
there’s not a vaccine? Hhhhmmm plugs said he patience was getting thin
let's just say we're not going to agree on your first two sentences.maineman » 16 Jul 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ There was no evidence of any cheating whatsoever. Every mail-in ballot counted came from a registered voter. And you keep ignoring the fact that NOTHING prevented Republicans from urging their voters to use mail-in ballots rather than risk COVID to vote on election day. In fact, even the clown himself voted by mail and now wants Republicans to vote that way in 2024.
I am aware that there are millions of MAGAts like you in America who believe the clown...but you are in the minority.
Newsflash: I could give a **** what you agree with me on.sunburn » 16 Jul 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ let's just say we're not going to agree on your first two sentences.
Too many anomolies, state polls shut down, blocking vote watchers, thousands and thousands of corrupt ballots,.............stuff you'll never believe.
They are there tho, someday some one will tell you.
Your kind are no better than a common thief.maineman » 16 Jul 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Newsflash: I could give a **** what you agree with me on.
Anomalies... an election held in the middle of a global pandemic is guaranteed to be anomalous. You have ZERO proof of "thousands of corrupt ballots" and ZERO proof of ANY fraudulent ones. We voted by mail, you voted in person. Bad choice for you.
there's actual data out there, dudemaineman » 16 Jul 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Newsflash: I could give a **** what you agree with me on.
Anomalies... an election held in the middle of a global pandemic is guaranteed to be anomalous. You have ZERO proof of "thousands of corrupt ballots" and ZERO proof of ANY fraudulent ones. We voted by mail, you voted in person. Bad choice for you.
evidence of fraud? Show it.
GFY
it's all been presented here before, no need to re-run for people that won't look.
unproven allegations are not proof.sunburn » 16 Jul 2023, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑ it's all been presented here before, no need to re-run for people that won't look.
most of them are numbers that are in print, provided from data of election committees.
numbers in print?sunburn » 16 Jul 2023, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ most of them are numbers that are in print, provided from data of election committees.
proves how assinine you are.maineman » 16 Jul 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑ numbers in print?
wow.
123456789
now THAT is evidence of fraud, eh?
you should only use words short enough that you can spell them correctly, moron.
There is a conservative site that does document real voter fraud, dating back about ten years or a little more.RebelGator » 16 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ They have chronicled thousands of dead people casting ballots, there's goes your fictional story, fact checked on the first page.
That's a poor argument you make......your side cheats better.
You were clowning for epps. You should have the chops to answer questions about why he would say things that make your position sound stupid.maineman » 15 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ seems to me you're the **** clown for thinking that anyone else can discern the rationale behind someone else's opinion.
It' was misspelled on purpose. the change fits you.maineman » 16 Jul 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ you should only use words short enough that you can spell them correctly, moron.
DO you HAVE any actual proof of voter fraud, or just "some numbers" without any provenance?