provenance for voter rolls that show that there were more votes than registered voters?sunburn » 22 Jul 2023, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑ It' was misspelled on purpose. the change fits you.
all the voter rolls that show there were more votes than registered people have provenance.
all of the votes that came from empty lots have provenance.
all of the voters that had to fight to vote(because they "had already voted") have provenance.
signature "verified" in less than 3 seconds have provenance. Court records.
you can sit there and be obtuse(13456) all you want.
Demonrats went way above "adapting" all the way into lying and cheating.
I have zero dog in the fight concerning Epps. As far as I am concerned, he's a MAGA moron and ought to be in prison.HillaryClinton » 21 Jul 2023, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You were clowning for epps. You should have the chops to answer questions about why he would say things that make your position sound stupid.
You seem suicidal.
Well, ****, seems you are SO EFFING WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING, its EASY TO PROVE that "registered voters" are using VACANT LOTS as ADDRESSES!! And this is just ONE COUNTY in ONE STATE!! So you can take your **** AND SHOVE IT BACK UP YOUR *** WHERE YOU DRUG IT OUT OF, **** COWARD PIECE OF ****!!maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ provenance for voter rolls that show that there were more votes than registered voters?
Link that up if you would be so kind.
Votes don't come from real estate, they come from registered voters. Show me all of those votes that cannot be linked back to the registered voter who cast them, if you would be so kind.
Blah,blah,blah.Beekeeper » 22 Jul 2023, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Well, ****, seems you are SO EFFING WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING, its EASY TO PROVE that "registered voters" are using VACANT LOTS as ADDRESSES!! And this is just ONE COUNTY in ONE STATE!! So you can take your **** AND SHOVE IT BACK UP YOUR *** WHERE YOU DRUG IT OUT OF, **** COWARD PIECE OF ****!!
https://www.ajc.com/news/scores-fulton- ... yTj63RlUL/
Scores of Fulton voters registered at empty lots
In the wake of a series of elections errors, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution dug into the issues affecting the Fulton County Registration and Elections Department. By poring over documents, analyzing voter spreadsheets and interviewing experts, county officials, poll workers and voters, the AJC has exposed flaws in the department’s handling of elections and the hiring of a former director. The newspaper revealed how, because of slow data processing, thousands of registered voters didn’t appear on voter rolls in the presidential election, creating long lines and causing Fulton to use more paper ballots than the entire rest of the state combined. Today’s article looks at how more than 100 people voted last year while registered at demolished public housing stock.
More questions have been raised about the integrity of Fulton County elections, specifically whether a flawed registration database has allowed voters to cast fraudulent ballots by claiming they live at vacant addresses.
In November, 122 people who voted are still registered at demolished Atlanta public housing projects, elections Interim Director Sharon Mitchell told the department’s oversight board on Thursday.
The problem could be more widespread. Fulton’s Information Technology department ran a crosscheck and found 10,000 people registered at vacant lots and vacant buildings throughout the county, Mitchell said.
“I had no idea it was that bad,” said Gary Smith, a former Forsyth County elections supervisor who worked as a consultant for Fulton during last year’s presidential contest and penned a damning report about its operations. “It just shows what we’ve been talking about all along with the voter registration database — it’s a mess.”
You mean the MOST LEFT WING NEWSPAPER IN GEORGIA is printing "fake news"??
it's already been shown....in several statesl...and you were here, so you saw them then.maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ provenance for voter rolls that show that there were more votes than registered voters?
Link that up if you would be so kind.
Votes don't come from real estate, they come from registered voters. Show me all of those votes that cannot be linked back to the registered voter who cast them, if you would be so kind.
unauthenticated conspiracy anecdotes are not proof.sunburn » 22 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ it's already been shown....in several statesl...and you were here, so you saw them then.
what’s your number?maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ unauthenticated conspiracy anecdotes are not proof.
Call me when you get some.
ok mine is 8675309
Uh, that would be everyone of them, quit playing stupid. Your whole ballot could be changed and you wouldn't have a clue....like most things.maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ Show me all of those votes that cannot be linked back to the registered voter who cast them, if you would be so kind.
^^^ sez the guy who has never witnessed ballots being counted. You do know that ballots are marked in INK, don't you?RebelGator » 22 Jul 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Uh, that would be everyone of them, quit playing stupid. Your whole ballot could be changed and you wouldn't have a clue....like most things.
Thanks for validating my contention, there's a glimmer of hope for you.maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^ sez the guy who has never witnessed ballots being counted. You do know that ballots are marked in INK, don't you?
Casting doubt on the integrity of the election system just because your guy lost is a losing short game.
they're out there, you just ignored them.maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ unauthenticated conspiracy anecdotes are not proof.
Call me when you get some.
ballots don't get changed willy-nilly. Registered voters mark their ballots in the privacy of their kitchen or living room, them put them in the envelope, they sign the envelope, they put it in the mail, and they are counted. There is ZERO evidence of more voters voting than the number registered in ANY precinct, town, city, or county. There is NOT ONE VOTE you can point to and say that it was not cast by a duly registered voter. NOT ONE...CERTAINLY NOT EIGHT MILLION!RebelGator » 22 Jul 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Thanks for validating my contention, there's a glimmer of hope for you.
****. "documented" my ***. NOT ONE BALLOT.sunburn » 22 Jul 2023, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ they're out there, you just ignored them.
all documented and posted here before.
not going to honor you, a certified ******* by posting probably the third or fourth time.
keep smokin your weed or drinking your booze, *******.
keep running away from your lie. If you had legitimate documentation, you would have simply posted the link to it.
It! there are several hundred.maineman » 22 Jul 2023, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑ keep running away from your lie. If you had legitimate documentation, you would have simply posted the link to it.