how are they validated?maineman » 13 Jul 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Our process is administered by public servants. If you have no faith in your fellow citizens who serve in that capacity, **** move somewhere else.
The fact of the matter is: ballots are only sent to registered voters and ballots returned by those registered voters are not counted until they are validated.
I'm not moving but I will change your deviant beliefs and behavior.maineman » 13 Jul 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Our process is administered by public servants. If you have no faith in your fellow citizens who serve in that capacity, **** move somewhere else.
The fact of the matter is: ballots are only sent to registered voters and ballots returned by those registered voters are not counted until they are validated.
how do you plan on doing that, cowboy?RebelGator » 13 Jul 2023, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not moving but I will change your deviant beliefs and behavior.
check with your local officials for their procedures. There is no universally adopted SOP.
what is the validation process?maineman » 13 Jul 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Our process is administered by public servants. If you have no faith in your fellow citizens who serve in that capacity, **** move somewhere else.
The fact of the matter is: ballots are only sent to registered voters and ballots returned by those registered voters are not counted until they are validated.
they weren't.
wow that’s quicksunburn » 13 Jul 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ they weren't.
Arizona had over 200000 signatures "validated" in less than 3 seconds each!
And the court concluded that they "were" validated by a judge that was removed from an investment firms board for some reason and was part of the accusation that got that Arizona Senator removed from office..
what a farce!
DO YOU FINDING MIXING WORDS TO BE A FAVORITE HOBBY? WHERE DID I SAY REGISTERED VOTERS SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN BALLOTS?maineman » 12 Jul 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ why should registered voters NOT receive ballots? If they walked into a polling place, they would get them
Sorry boozo, but it wasn't OUR SIDE that did all the CHEATING!! Like MAILING BALLOTS to EVERYONE regardless of them REQUESTING ONE, pulling CASES of ballots from under tables AFTER they "sent everyone home" in Fulton Co. Ga, and I can go on and on and on.razoo » 13 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ it was all over the wide screen for the world to see that the fake fascist republican party has been trying to steal the election beginning on Jan 6th Insurrection day............still after nearly two years we find that if any one was committing election fraud it is the Fake Fascist Republican Party..............
Right Wing Watch
http://www.pfaw.org/rww-in-focus/alec-t ... ures#Voter
What cheating?Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry boozo, but it wasn't OUR SIDE that did all the CHEATING!!
You've reached peak stupidity, you can quit smoking weed.....maybe after the Hollywood *** get back to whatever they do, no sense in you going cold turkey and not being able to watch Naked and Afraid without some anesthetic to comfort you.Squatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:13 am » wrote: ↑ What cheating?
Can you prove it in a court of law?
Are you going to cry harder when Republicans lose in 2024?
Boo hoo you old bitch.
Could be a while 2 unions on strike nowRebelGator » 14 Jul 2023, 4:57 am » wrote: ↑ You've reached peak stupidity, you can quit smoking weed.....maybe after the Hollywood *** get back to whatever they do, no sense in you going cold turkey and not being able to watch Naked and Afraid without some anesthetic to comfort you.
When the SAME ones running the ELECTIONS, doing the CHEATING, AND doing any INVESTIGATION of that CHEATING, then no, you don't get any "evidence" of cheating.Squatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:13 am » wrote: ↑ What cheating?
Can you prove it in a court of law?
Are you going to cry harder when Republicans lose in 2024?
Boo hoo you old bitch.
The crybabies don't need to prove there was cheating. All that is necessary is that they CLAIM there was cheating and then they can WHINE about cheating and justify their unending hissy-fit about 2020.Squatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 3:13 am » wrote: ↑ What cheating?
Can you prove it in a court of law?
Are you going to cry harder when Republicans lose in 2024?
Boo hoo you old bitch.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Beekeeper » 14 Jul 2023, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ When the SAME ones running the ELECTIONS, doing the CHEATING, AND doing any INVESTIGATION of that CHEATING, then no, you don't get any "evidence" of cheating.
Squatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
. You poor poor old groomer.
In other words you have nothing but whining and crying as usual.
You should do your family a favor and kill yourself now before you become too much of a burden on them. I'm sure they're tired of hearing about your far fetched dementia fueled conspiracy theories.
Just wait until trump gets defeated again.maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ The crybabies don't need to prove there was cheating. All that is necessary is that they CLAIM there was cheating and then they can WHINE about cheating and justify their unending hissy-fit about 2020.
There was either cheating or you're a dumb ****, which one you going with?maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ The crybabies don't need to prove there was cheating. All that is necessary is that they CLAIM there was cheating and then they can WHINE about cheating and justify their unending hissy-fit about 2020.
Either you can prove it or you're a dumb ****.RebelGator » 14 Jul 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ There was either cheating or you're a dumb ****, which one you going with?