STFU YOU ****** **** POS COWARDSquatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ Either you can prove it or you're a dumb ****.
We already know you can't prove there was cheating,dumb ****.
You really are the epitomy of "Florida man" aren't you?
Dumb and gullible.
So you can't prove election fraud either.
Squatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ Just wait until trump gets defeated again.
The squealing will be glorious!
That is if the republicans don't have him killed first.
Or he is disqualified from running for conspiracy to commit sedition.
sedition there’s that word againSquatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ Just wait until trump gets defeated again.
The squealing will be glorious!
That is if the republicans don't have him killed first.
Or he is disqualified from running for conspiracy to commit sedition.
states didn’t follow their constitution when they implemented voting law changesSquatchman » 14 Jul 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ So you can't prove election fraud either.
Then again you can't prove who your dad was.
Prove the cheating or shut the **** up, moron. How about that?RebelGator » 14 Jul 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ There was either cheating or you're a dumb ****, which one you going with?
And courts have ruled that the remedy for that is prospective. The rule changes have been either rewritten or properly codified. bada bing bada boom.BuckNaked » 14 Jul 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ states didn’t follow their constitution when they implemented voting law changes
the word that people have been convicted of committing? that word?
ray Epps hasnt beenmaineman » 14 Jul 2023, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ the word that people have been convicted of committing? that word?
is that from US Code?BuckNaked » 14 Jul 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ ray Epps hasnt been
se·di·tion
/səˈdiSHən/
noun
- conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
what US code?maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ is that from US Code?![]()
Epps is gonna get RICH off of Faux News!
If you want to charge Epps with a crime, quote the statute he broke, not some namby-pamby internet dictionary definition that talks about "rebelling against a monarch".BuckNaked » 14 Jul 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ what US code?
does shouting go go go constitute causing a riot?
It would be suicide.DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2023, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ Hey, simpleton: The AP is part of MSM... The mouthpiece of the deep state assholes.
How can you expect them to turn their bosses in?
Fomenting a riot on federal property.maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ If you want to charge Epps with a crime, quote the statute he broke,
that’s the definition of sedition I didn’t use the word just giving the definition is the correct word to use?maineman » 14 Jul 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ If you want to charge Epps with a crime, quote the statute he broke, not some namby-pamby internet dictionary definition that talks about "rebelling against a monarch".
And I will say unequivocally that I used to shout "go go go" damned near every time my defenseman son stole the puck at the blue line and it NEVER caused a riot.
plus he crossed the police barricades wtf?HillaryClinton » 14 Jul 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Fomenting a riot on federal property.
Conspiracy to overthrow the government.
Here, look. "Tomorrow, we go INTO the capitol! INTO the capitol!"
If the "breach" of the capitol was illegal, uring the "breach" was illegal.
https://rumble.com/embed/vlluxe/?pub=4
it is not the definition used in the law.BuckNaked » 14 Jul 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ that’s the definition of sedition I didn’t use the word just giving the definition is the correct word to use?
There is nothing illegal about suggesting to a group of people that you think they should go into the US Capitol the next day. He just as easily could have said, "Tomorrow, we go to INTO the Lincoln Memorial...and the next day, The SMITHSONIAN!!!!"HillaryClinton » 14 Jul 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Fomenting a riot on federal property.
Conspiracy to overthrow the government.
Here, look. "Tomorrow, we go INTO the capitol! INTO the capitol!"
If the "breach" of the capitol was illegal, uring the "breach" was illegal.
https://rumble.com/embed/vlluxe/?pub=4