Liberal Forum

Watch the Biden Administration do everything they can to cover up Hunter Biden's sack of Cocaine found in the White House.  They are tripping all over themselves to create new, fake narratives about where the Cocaine was found.

First, in the Library, then in a cubby locker, then in a construction zone.  Lies.  Total fabricated lies. Here's the deal:

• One person found the cocaine.  He reported it and turned it in.
• That one person knows exactly where the cocaine was found.
• He knows exactly what he did with it and who took it from him.
• The chain of evidence for the cocaine is easy to establish.

That is, unless there is a concerted coverup going on.  And, that's exactly what you have.  A concerted coverup by Democrats to try and show the Cocaine was not Junkie-Son, Hunter Biden.

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am

Watch the Biden Administration do everything they can to cover up Hunter Biden's sack of Cocaine found in the White House.  They are tripping all over themselves to create new, fake narratives about where the Cocaine was found.

First, in the Library, then in a cubby locker, then in a construction zone.  Lies.  Total fabricated lies. Here's the deal:

• One person found the cocaine.  He reported it and turned it in.
• That one person knows exactly where the cocaine was found.
• He knows exactly what he did with it and who took it from him.
• The chain of evidence for the cocaine is easy to establish.

That is, unless there is a concerted coverup going on.  And, that's exactly what you have.  A concerted coverup by Democrats to try and show the Cocaine was not Junkie-Son, Hunter Biden.

I wonder how many other WH staffers had a mouth that looked like Hunter's?

This looks like your Number 1 suspect to me, because there's no other possible reason that the WH would refuse to immediately take action against the person THEY KNOW FULL WELL that brought the coke into the WH!

 
 

Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:37 am

I wonder how many other WH staffers had a mouth that looked like Hunter's?

This looks like your Number 1 suspect to me, because there's no other possible reason that the WH would refuse to immediately take action against the person THEY KNOW FULL WELL that brought the coke into the WH!

Hunter is pathetic.  But, the coverup is truly laughable.  As if we don't know exactly what is going on here. 
 

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am

Watch the Biden Administration do everything they can to cover up Hunter Biden's sack of Cocaine found in the White House.  They are tripping all over themselves to create new, fake narratives about where the Cocaine was found.

First, in the Library, then in a cubby locker, then in a construction zone.  Lies.  Total fabricated lies. Here's the deal:

• One person found the cocaine.  He reported it and turned it in.
• That one person knows exactly where the cocaine was found.
• He knows exactly what he did with it and who took it from him.
• The chain of evidence for the cocaine is easy to establish.

That is, unless there is a concerted coverup going on.  And, that's exactly what you have.  A concerted coverup by Democrats to try and show the Cocaine was not Junkie-Son, Hunter Biden.

What happened to that, nothing in the news about it anymore, maybe they think it will go away if they simply ignore it...

 


 

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:45 am

Hunter is pathetic.  But, the coverup is truly laughable.  As if we don't know exactly what is going on here.

That's what happens when you have a fake media that's working for the Democrat party any time they need to cover their ***!

There is NO investigation "ongoing".
And all pretense that there ever was will end in the next few weeks as the WH keeps stonewalling with their lies that the media is all too happy to swallow, starting with the LIES that Hunter was NOT in the WH on the Friday before the holiday weekend when he was proven to be there all day and didn't leave until late Friday night.

There needs to be Congressional hearings and have Hunter dragged before it to answer questions under oath.

 

Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:06 am

That's what happens when you have a fake media that's working for the Democrat party any time they need to cover their ***!

There is NO investigation "ongoing".
And all pretense that there ever was will end in the next few weeks as the WH keeps stonewalling with their lies that the media is all too happy to swallow, starting with the LIES that Hunter was NOT in the WH on the Friday before the holiday weekend when he was proven to be there all day and didn't leave until late Friday night.

There needs to be Congressional hearings and have Hunter dragged before it to answer questions under oath.

I would say "why wasn't this turned over to the FBI" - but they are corrupt.  Or, "why wasn't this turned over to local DC authorities", but they are corrupt as well.  We are a nation being lead by a bunch of drug-guzzling x-hippies.
 

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:15 am

I would say "why wasn't this turned over to the FBI" - but they are corrupt.  Or, "why wasn't this turned over to local DC authorities", but they are corrupt as well.  We are a nation being lead by a bunch of drug-guzzling x-hippies.

True on all counts.
And here's the thing:

If, as we all believe it was placed by Hunter, it tells us very little more than we already knew, except for how big an idiot this jackass junkie really is!

But if it WASN'T Hunter's coke, then we have a serious security problem at the WH that needs to be addressed by the only uncorrupted group in DC, and that's the Republican-led House.

Are we suppose to be unconcerned about how easy it would be for another person to plant anthrax or even a bomb in the same area?
By their refusal to force the issue, we're being told by the WH and the fawning media that WH security is worthless and everyone in that department needs to be fired immediately!
 

Why would hunter remove a bag of cocaine in a public area in the White House?

Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:38 am

True on all counts.
And here's the thing:

If, as we all believe it was placed by Hunter, it tells us very little more than we already knew, except for how big an idiot this jackass junkie really is!

But if it WASN'T Hunter's coke, then we have a serious security problem at the WH that needs to be addressed by the only uncorrupted group in DC, and that's the Republican-led House.

Are we suppose to be unconcerned about how easy it would be for another person to plant anthrax or even a bomb in the same area?
By their refusal to force the issue, we're being told by the WH and the fawning media that WH security is worthless and everyone in that department needs to be fired immediately!

Except, they aren't worthless. They know exactly where that cocaine came from and to whom it belongs. There are cameras everywhere and security everywhere. 

Workers don't take cocaine to work with them.  And, even if they did, they couldn't afford to just leave it lying around.  There is only one uncontrollable drug addict that gets free access to every part of the white house - Hunter Biden.  A freaking 3rd grader would be able to figure out who's cocaine this belongs to.

And, cocaine is a problem, because someone is supplying it and that someone expects favors in return.
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:06 am

That's what happens when you have a fake media that's working for the Democrat party any time they need to cover their ***!

There is NO investigation "ongoing".
And all pretense that there ever was will end in the next few weeks as the WH keeps stonewalling with their lies that the media is all too happy to swallow, starting with the LIES that Hunter was NOT in the WH on the Friday before the holiday weekend when he was proven to be there all day and didn't leave until late Friday night.

There needs to be Congressional hearings and have Hunter dragged before it to answer questions under oath.

Hearings? We don't need no stinking hearings! Says the most useless RINOS ever. 

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am

Watch the Biden Administration do everything they can to cover up Hunter Biden's sack of Cocaine found in the White House.  They are tripping all over themselves to create new, fake narratives about where the Cocaine was found.

First, in the Library, then in a cubby locker, then in a construction zone.  Lies.  Total fabricated lies. Here's the deal:

• One person found the cocaine.  He reported it and turned it in.
• That one person knows exactly where the cocaine was found.
• He knows exactly what he did with it and who took it from him.
• The chain of evidence for the cocaine is easy to establish.

That is, unless there is a concerted coverup going on.  And, that's exactly what you have.  A concerted coverup by Democrats to try and show the Cocaine was not Junkie-Son, Hunter Biden.

Cool opinion.  Do you have ANY proof, or is conjecture your stock in trade?

Skans » 12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 8:21 am

Watch the Biden Administration do everything they can to cover up Hunter Biden's sack of Cocaine found in the White House.  They are tripping all over themselves to create new, fake narratives about where the Cocaine was found.

First, in the Library, then in a cubby locker, then in a construction zone.  Lies.  Total fabricated lies. Here's the deal:

• One person found the cocaine.  He reported it and turned it in.
• That one person knows exactly where the cocaine was found.
• He knows exactly what he did with it and who took it from him.
• The chain of evidence for the cocaine is easy to establish.

That is, unless there is a concerted coverup going on.  And, that's exactly what you have.  A concerted coverup by Democrats to try and show the Cocaine was not Junkie-Son, Hunter Biden.

On the coldest night in January 2004 my son went out, got drunk, and he wrecked his mother’s (my first wife’s ) brand new Ford pickup in a most embarrassing place out in the subdivision where she lived, hitting a tree head on.

I knew when the sun came up the entire neighborhood would know my ex wife’s son had destroyed her truck in a drunken spree.

As I was trying to arrange a tow for cash to a secret location by a tow truck driver I knew, my good present wife asked me 

Are you trying to use your connections and influence to help your son avoid the consequences of his bad behavior?


I said yes, that is entirely the whole **** point!

What else is a father for, except that?

My son and I struggled to cover up his wreck until dawn and succeeded.

And both my first and present wife sat together in my old home and plotted against me,,,but not the boy.

If that cocaine is Hunter’s, I hope Joe hides it.

What should he do, betray his son?
 

maineman » 12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm

Cool opinion.  Do you have ANY proof, or is conjecture your stock in trade?

Here's a fact. The area is under surveillance 24/7. The Brandon administration knows who left it there. But nobody knows a thing. How about that? 
And then there's you, an 80-year-old **** democrat who thinks subs still run on diesel...sticking up for that guy you voted for.
Your walker needs tennis balls.  
 

Bruce » 12 Jul 2023, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 10:43 pm

On the coldest night in January 2004 my son went out, got drunk, and he wrecked his mother’s (my first wife’s ) brand new Ford pickup in a most embarrassing place out in the subdivision where she lived, hitting a tree head on.

I knew when the sun came up the entire neighborhood would know my ex wife’s son had destroyed her truck in a drunken spree.

As I was trying to arrange a tow for cash to a secret location by a tow truck driver I knew, my good present wife asked me 

Are you trying to use your connections and influence to help your son avoid the consequences of his bad behavior?

I said yes, that is entirely the whole **** point!

What else is a father for, except that?

My son and I struggled to cover up his wreck until dawn and succeeded.

And both my first and present wife sat together in my old home and plotted against me,,,but not the boy.

If that cocaine is Hunter’s, I hope Joe hides it.

What should he do, betray his son?

Really? You think a drug cover up by the president would be an example of good parenting?  I call ****.

Briefing to congress at 10 today

maineman » 12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm

Cool opinion.  Do you have ANY proof, or is conjecture your stock in trade?

What part of his point that one person found the cocaine is an opinion?
Your lack of any intelligent reasoning is only surpassed by the high opinion you have on your own worthless partisan ***.

 
 

RebelGator » 13 Jul 2023, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2023, 5:51 am

What part of his point that one person found the cocaine is an opinion?
Your lack of any intelligent reasoning is only surpassed by the high opinion you have on your own worthless partisan ***.

the "Hunter Biden's bag of cocaine" part is the opinion, idiot.

maineman » 12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 9:55 pm

Cool opinion.  Do you have ANY proof, or is conjecture your stock in trade?

Common sense.  Logic.  And, you just watch how this unfolds.  When the top agencies in the US "can't figure this out", it's been figured out. 
 

Bruce » 12 Jul 2023, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2023, 10:43 pm

If that cocaine is Hunter’s, I hope Joe hides it.

What should he do, betray his son?
 

Absolutely, he should betray his son.  We aren't talking "Joe Biden", father of a crack-head.  We are talking Joe Biden who took an oath as the President of the United States.  To uphold our Constitution.  To treat everyone equally under the law. 

Joe Biden is an elected official.  But, not just any elected official, the President of a country with 350,000,000 people.  His obligations to the Country surpass any obligations he thinks he might have to his crack-head son.  If Joe Biden can't wrap his mind around this, then he is truly a worthless, self-dealing, piece of ****, even lower than his crack-head son.
 

Z09 » 13 Jul 2023, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2023, 6:10 am

Just to play the devil's advocate...

If the cocaine was found during the Trump years I'd suspect it was "planted"......
It could always be planted by an anti-Biden White Hosue visitor....

Ok, let's go there. 

• All white house visitors are thoroughly screened, photographed and documented. 
• There are cameras in every one of the "three" (****) alleged locations.  Surely, who dropped the coke-bag would be quickly discovered.
• There are records of which white-house guest was where at any given moment.
• If it was a "plant", this would be a huge breach of security, and you would have the FBI, DEA and Secret Service involved - the perp would be caught, if he/she was still inside the country or even in Europe.
• Are there finger prints on the bag?  If so, then who's.  If not, then this is telling as well.
• Are there traces of cocaine (easily discovered using a drug dog) anywhere else in the whitehouse?  Has a search been done?  If so, what were the results.  If not, why not - that in and of itself is very telling.
• Was the bag sealed or had it been opened?
• Who has custody of the bag right now, and what is the chain of custody?

Now, do you see why this charade is complete and total ****?  They know who that coke-bag belongs to, or they don't want to find out.  And, that leads only to one conclusion - someone close to the President, which would be Hunter Biden or Ashley Biden.  And, Hunter is the hopelessly addicted crack-head who leaves evidence-filled laptops lying around. So, it's Hunter's.