Liberal Forum

When a NOBLE LAUREATE sees that this "Climate science" **** is PURE ****, then you LOSERCRATS need to open your eyes and realize that there is NO CONSENSUS but only a bunch of "science writers" pushing a **** NARRATIVE that you gobble down like it was truth!!

It's NOT!!

NOBEL LAUREATE: “CLIMATE SCIENCE HAS METASTASIZED INTO MASSIVE SHOCK-JOURNALISTIC PSEUDOSCIENCE” 

 Dr. John F. Clauser, joint recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, has criticized the climate emergency narrative calling it “a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”

 Along with two others, Dr Clauser, an experimental and theoretical physicist, was the 2022 recipient of the Nobel Prize for work done in the 1970s that showed “quantum entanglement” allowed particles such as photons, effectively, to interact at great distances, seemingly to require communication exceeding the speed of light. 

 He has criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming, according to a coalition of scientists and commentators who argue that an informed discussion about CO2 would recognise its importance in sustaining plant life. 

 In a statement issued by the CO2 coalition, Nobel Laureate John Clauser Elected to CO2 Coalition Board of Directors – CO2 Coalition Dr. Clauser said that “there is no climate crisis and that increasing CO2 concentrations will benefit the world”

 …Read more: https://gript.ie/nobel-laureate-climate ... doscience/

 

Beekeeper » 15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am

When a NOBLE LAUREATE sees that this "Climate science" **** is PURE ****, then you LOSERCRATS need to open your eyes and realize that there is NO CONSENSUS but only a bunch of "science writers" pushing a **** NARRATIVE that you gobble down like it was truth!!

It's NOT!!

Imagine if people were practical.
Maybe just looking at the really obvious stuff first would make eco-orgs "deep dives" into "impossibly complex" systems a bit more believable.

- Like selling bottles of water in disposable plastic containers. Think about it: One of, if not the most, common forms of trash pollution on the planet (plastic) surrounding a nearly free product simply for profit and convenience. A world-wide distribution of plastic which has saturated our oceans. Irony.

- Basically ignoring the worst polluters on the planet and/or trading "credits" so polluters can continue. This, instead of acknowledging some industries just plain pollute. Actually solving the pitfalls of discharge into the environment might be better than burning rivers and face masks. Simply: where is the foggiest/smoggiest/smelliest stuff? Keep going after whoever is the worst. Maybe tackle that sacred cow next to India...

- Environmentalists seem to search for the "canary in the coal mine" all the time. Even Greenpeace assholes have admitted to exaggerated claims to instill fear so people will listen (ruining their credibility along the way, of course).
Spotted owls and snail darters were huge. Meanwhile invasive species totally **** up the Great Lakes, Everglades, etc.
There just seems to be no practical movements actually doing anything but advertising and "creating awareness".

Lots of organizations with stupid, easily ignorable agendas. My rant is meant to show why people in general are easily pushed into a mindset. Too tired of it to give it much thought anymore, if they ever really did. 

Something like that...
 

Beekeeper » 15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am

When a NOBLE LAUREATE sees that this "Climate science" **** is PURE ****, then you LOSERCRATS need to open your eyes and realize that there is NO CONSENSUS but only a bunch of "science writers" pushing a **** NARRATIVE that you gobble down like it was truth!!

It's NOT!!

meh, they'll just be labeled crackpots...you know them smart people...just a bit off...  

Beekeeper » 15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 6:12 am

When a NOBLE LAUREATE sees that this "Climate science" **** is PURE ****, then you LOSERCRATS need to open your eyes and realize that there is NO CONSENSUS but only a bunch of "science writers" pushing a **** NARRATIVE that you gobble down like it was truth!!

It's NOT!!

Pressure groups like "Extinction Rebellion" actively proselytise throughout the Western world for their doomsday creed. Yet are strangely silent about what must be immense carbon dioxide and other emissions as a result of the Ukraine conflict. Meanwhile, our rulers have already set the nation on course for membership of NATO, with a view to participating in various elective wars around the world. Without any concern for carbon emissions. To take the American Abrams tank as a case study: this monster boasts a 300 gallon fuel tank which lasts for at most 8 hours - even if stationary. Add to this the fuel requirements of all the other ground, air and naval forces which would be involved in combat. In summary, our schizophrenic regime wants to subsidise vast military carbon emissions (and invite the destruction of our cities) while simultaneously taxing Irish motorists into penury for their comparatively trivial emissions. "The Science" seems to indicate that carbon emissions anointed in blood are harmless but those produced for any other purpose threaten the very existence of the planet.

great comment from article...

DeezerShoove » 15 Jul 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 7:11 am

Imagine if people were practical.
Maybe just looking at the really obvious stuff first would make eco-orgs "deep dives" into "impossibly complex" systems a bit more believable.

- Like selling bottles of water in disposable plastic containers. Think about it: One of, if not the most, common forms of trash pollution on the planet (plastic) surrounding a nearly free product simply for profit and convenience. A world-wide distribution of plastic which has saturated our oceans. Irony.

- Basically ignoring the worst polluters on the planet and/or trading "credits" so polluters can continue. This, instead of acknowledging some industries just plain pollute. Actually solving the pitfalls of discharge into the environment might be better than burning rivers and face masks. Simply: where is the foggiest/smoggiest/smelliest stuff? Keep going after whoever is the worst. Maybe tackle that sacred cow next to India...

- Environmentalists seem to search for the "canary in the coal mine" all the time. Even Greenpeace assholes have admitted to exaggerated claims to instill fear so people will listen (ruining their credibility along the way, of course).
Spotted owls and snail darters were huge. Meanwhile invasive species totally **** up the Great Lakes, Everglades, etc.
There just seems to be no practical movements actually doing anything but advertising and "creating awareness".

Lots of organizations with stupid, easily ignorable agendas. My rant is meant to show why people in general are easily pushed into a mindset. Too tired of it to give it much thought anymore, if they ever really did. 

Something like that...

The packaging industry is out of control...