Liberal Forum

Political philosophy is a vast field. Whether it's reading works written by anarchists, fascists, communists, primitivists, libertarians *shudders*, Greens, or republicans, there is usually something to glean from the authors in question even if you vehemently disagree with their foundation.

(Yes, even libertarians have, on occasion, some insight to offer)

American "politics" is a different story. I laugh at  the retarded conservatives who lament that "Our FF (founding fathers) would never have allowed all these rabble / riffraff to participate in our system" (the expansion of voting privileges to all citizens) given the irony that THEY are the same trash the FF would indubitably despise and scorn. 

I ALSO laugh at retarded liberals who mutter platitudes on the critical nature of voting. "Voting is one of the most sacred duties of citizens. Coz democracy!" 

(As Emma Goldman said, if voting changed anything they would make it illegal.)

Now if you disparage the sanctity of voting, retarded liberals and conservatives will cite a laundry list of "landmark legislation" that arose allegedly from checking some boxes or marking circles on ballots (or entering your preferences into a computer hosted by...*drumroll* Dominion).

What these retards don't realize is that 

A) People voted
B) Stuff happens

Does not mean A caused B.

For example, retarded liberals will say voting gave them the welfare state as initiated under FDR. What they don't know is that pretty much every existing system of capitalism (in "developed" countries) comes with a welfare state, meaning it was inevitable (FDR or no FDR). Likewise, conservative retards still salivate at the thought of the "Reagan years." They don't know the falling rate of capitalist profit due to competition and saturation (from 1945 -1975) birthed the neoliberal agenda of tax cutting, offshoring jobs, Bain-style vulture capitalism (raiding pensions, "restructuring," and selling "non-vital" assets), and "free trade" agreements to salvage corporations headed for bankruptcy.

But anyway, my thesis is this:

If you are an "extremist" then you have every reason to be involved in politics as your viewpoints are ill represented or not represented at all. Yep, Trotskyists and American "National Socialists" are both legit/have reason to be involved.

​​​​
However, the vast majority of political junkies (as peepee might say: "Trumptards, Bidentards, Obamatards, Bushtards, etceteratards") are not extremists. Our lord and savior of this forum @GeorgeWashington has made the case, correctly, that both conservative and liberal (retards) are CONSTITUTIONAL MODERATES.

IOW they are DEFENDERS of the status quo. Their viewpoints are perfectly represented by the DeSantises, the Trumps, the Hillaries, the Bidens, and even the Sanders(es) of our system.

SO WHY THE **** DO YOU WASTE ALL THIS TIME SPEWING GARBAGE ABOUT "DEMOCRAPS" OR "RETHUGS?"

Your "ideas" (flimsy/retarded that they are) are already being represented by the system we live in. 

​​​​(Imagine living in a one-party state like North Korea and shilling for Kim. THAT's how **** stupid you asswipes are - except you shill for the Republicrats.

The reason our system "sucks" is its qualities are perpetuated by trash like YOU.)
 

Do you do birthday parties?

LowIQTrash » 31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm

Political philosophy is a vast field. Whether it's reading works written by anarchists, fascists, communists, primitivists, libertarians *shudders*, Greens, or republicans, there is usually something to glean from the authors in question even if you vehemently disagree with their foundation.

(Yes, even libertarians have, on occasion, some insight to offer)

American "politics" is a different story. I laugh at  the retarded conservatives who lament that "Our FF (founding fathers) would never have allowed all these rabble / riffraff to participate in our system" (the expansion of voting privileges to all citizens) given the irony that THEY are the same trash the FF would indubitably despise and scorn. 

I ALSO laugh at retarded liberals who mutter platitudes on the critical nature of voting. "Voting is one of the most sacred duties of citizens. Coz democracy!" 

(As Emma Goldman said, if voting changed anything they would make it illegal.)

Now if you disparage the sanctity of voting, retarded liberals and conservatives will cite a laundry list of "landmark legislation" that arose allegedly from checking some boxes or marking circles on ballots (or entering your preferences into a computer hosted by...*drumroll* Dominion).

What these retards don't realize is that 

A) People voted
B) Stuff happens

Does not mean A caused B.

For example, retarded liberals will say voting gave them the welfare state as initiated under FDR. What they don't know is that pretty much every existing system of capitalism (in "developed" countries) comes with a welfare state, meaning it was inevitable (FDR or no FDR). Likewise, conservative retards still salivate at the thought of the "Reagan years." They don't know the falling rate of capitalist profit due to competition and saturation (from 1945 -1975) birthed the neoliberal agenda of tax cutting, offshoring jobs, Bain-style vulture capitalism (raiding pensions, "restructuring," and selling "non-vital" assets), and "free trade" agreements to salvage corporations headed for bankruptcy.

But anyway, my thesis is this:

If you are an "extremist" then you have every reason to be involved in politics as your viewpoints are ill represented or not represented at all. Yep, Trotskyists and American "National Socialists" are both legit/have reason to be involved.

​​​​
However, the vast majority of political junkies (as peepee might say: "Trumptards, Bidentards, Obamatards, Bushtards, etceteratards") are not extremists. Our lord and savior of this forum @GeorgeWashington has made the case, correctly, that both conservative and liberal (retards) are CONSTITUTIONAL MODERATES.

IOW they are DEFENDERS of the status quo. Their viewpoints are perfectly represented by the DeSantises, the Trumps, the Hillaries, the Bidens, and even the Sanders(es) of our system.

SO WHY THE **** DO YOU WASTE ALL THIS TIME SPEWING GARBAGE ABOUT "DEMOCRAPS" OR "RETHUGS?"

Your "ideas" (flimsy/retarded that they are) are already being represented by the system we live in. 

​​​​(Imagine living in a one-party state like North Korea and shilling for Kim. THAT's how **** stupid you asswipes are - except you shill for the Republicrats.

The reason our system "sucks" is its qualities are perpetuated by trash like YOU.)
 

An intellectual mind was socially developed to silence an instinctive brain navigating space while only living mutually evolving forward here now since conceived to replace one's own previous 4 generation gaps lived so far.

All this done compounding everything to only happening now. Absolute zero time a lifetime evolves within adapting to the moment as behaving when occupying space, here. > self evident.

LowIQTrash » 31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm

Political philosophy is a vast field. Whether it's reading works written by anarchists, fascists, communists, primitivists, libertarians *shudders*, Greens, or republicans, there is usually something to glean from the authors in question even if you vehemently disagree with their foundation.

(Yes, even libertarians have, on occasion, some insight to offer)

American "politics" is a different story. I laugh at  the retarded conservatives who lament that "Our FF (founding fathers) would never have allowed all these rabble / riffraff to participate in our system" (the expansion of voting privileges to all citizens) given the irony that THEY are the same trash the FF would indubitably despise and scorn. 

I ALSO laugh at retarded liberals who mutter platitudes on the critical nature of voting. "Voting is one of the most sacred duties of citizens. Coz democracy!" 

(As Emma Goldman said, if voting changed anything they would make it illegal.)

Now if you disparage the sanctity of voting, retarded liberals and conservatives will cite a laundry list of "landmark legislation" that arose allegedly from checking some boxes or marking circles on ballots (or entering your preferences into a computer hosted by...*drumroll* Dominion).

What these retards don't realize is that 

A) People voted
B) Stuff happens

Does not mean A caused B.

For example, retarded liberals will say voting gave them the welfare state as initiated under FDR. What they don't know is that pretty much every existing system of capitalism (in "developed" countries) comes with a welfare state, meaning it was inevitable (FDR or no FDR). Likewise, conservative retards still salivate at the thought of the "Reagan years." They don't know the falling rate of capitalist profit due to competition and saturation (from 1945 -1975) birthed the neoliberal agenda of tax cutting, offshoring jobs, Bain-style vulture capitalism (raiding pensions, "restructuring," and selling "non-vital" assets), and "free trade" agreements to salvage corporations headed for bankruptcy.

But anyway, my thesis is this:

If you are an "extremist" then you have every reason to be involved in politics as your viewpoints are ill represented or not represented at all. Yep, Trotskyists and American "National Socialists" are both legit/have reason to be involved.

​​​​
However, the vast majority of political junkies (as peepee might say: "Trumptards, Bidentards, Obamatards, Bushtards, etceteratards") are not extremists. Our lord and savior of this forum @GeorgeWashington has made the case, correctly, that both conservative and liberal (retards) are CONSTITUTIONAL MODERATES.

IOW they are DEFENDERS of the status quo. Their viewpoints are perfectly represented by the DeSantises, the Trumps, the Hillaries, the Bidens, and even the Sanders(es) of our system.

SO WHY THE **** DO YOU WASTE ALL THIS TIME SPEWING GARBAGE ABOUT "DEMOCRAPS" OR "RETHUGS?"

Your "ideas" (flimsy/retarded that they are) are already being represented by the system we live in. 

​​​​(Imagine living in a one-party state like North Korea and shilling for Kim. THAT's how **** stupid you asswipes are - except you shill for the Republicrats.

The reason our system "sucks" is its qualities are perpetuated by trash like YOU.)

What an inordinate amount of WASTED TIME you spend in the creation of this abject and total piece of ****.

Did your mommy leave you alone without your coloring book again??

LowIQTrash » 31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm

Political philosophy is a vast field. Whether it's reading works written by anarchists, fascists, communists, primitivists, libertarians *shudders*, Greens, or republicans, there is usually something to glean from the authors in question even if you vehemently disagree with their foundation.

(Yes, even libertarians have, on occasion, some insight to offer)

American "politics" is a different story. I laugh at  the retarded conservatives who lament that "Our FF (founding fathers) would never have allowed all these rabble / riffraff to participate in our system" (the expansion of voting privileges to all citizens) given the irony that THEY are the same trash the FF would indubitably despise and scorn. 

I ALSO laugh at retarded liberals who mutter platitudes on the critical nature of voting. "Voting is one of the most sacred duties of citizens. Coz democracy!" 

(As Emma Goldman said, if voting changed anything they would make it illegal.)

Now if you disparage the sanctity of voting, retarded liberals and conservatives will cite a laundry list of "landmark legislation" that arose allegedly from checking some boxes or marking circles on ballots (or entering your preferences into a computer hosted by...*drumroll* Dominion).

What these retards don't realize is that 

A) People voted
B) Stuff happens

Does not mean A caused B.

For example, retarded liberals will say voting gave them the welfare state as initiated under FDR. What they don't know is that pretty much every existing system of capitalism (in "developed" countries) comes with a welfare state, meaning it was inevitable (FDR or no FDR). Likewise, conservative retards still salivate at the thought of the "Reagan years." They don't know the falling rate of capitalist profit due to competition and saturation (from 1945 -1975) birthed the neoliberal agenda of tax cutting, offshoring jobs, Bain-style vulture capitalism (raiding pensions, "restructuring," and selling "non-vital" assets), and "free trade" agreements to salvage corporations headed for bankruptcy.

But anyway, my thesis is this:

If you are an "extremist" then you have every reason to be involved in politics as your viewpoints are ill represented or not represented at all. Yep, Trotskyists and American "National Socialists" are both legit/have reason to be involved.

​​​​
However, the vast majority of political junkies (as peepee might say: "Trumptards, Bidentards, Obamatards, Bushtards, etceteratards") are not extremists. Our lord and savior of this forum @GeorgeWashington has made the case, correctly, that both conservative and liberal (retards) are CONSTITUTIONAL MODERATES.

IOW they are DEFENDERS of the status quo. Their viewpoints are perfectly represented by the DeSantises, the Trumps, the Hillaries, the Bidens, and even the Sanders(es) of our system.

SO WHY THE **** DO YOU WASTE ALL THIS TIME SPEWING GARBAGE ABOUT "DEMOCRAPS" OR "RETHUGS?"

Your "ideas" (flimsy/retarded that they are) are already being represented by the system we live in. 

​​​​(Imagine living in a one-party state like North Korea and shilling for Kim. THAT's how **** stupid you asswipes are - except you shill for the Republicrats.

The reason our system "sucks" is its qualities are perpetuated by trash like YOU.)

Anti creation feudal monarchy cloaked with complicated political theory's, old world feudal monarchy with a new anti all creation twist.

The obvious and not so obvious paid actor-writers for the monarchy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_3Nf6xjeFs

Separated groups of serfs war against each other as they lose all property, democrips and repobloodlicans, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp05-RGTnBI

 

DeezerShoove » 31 Jul 2023, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2023, 11:09 pm

Do you do birthday parties?

 

LowIQTrash » 31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2023, 11:04 pm

Political philosophy is a vast field. Whether it's reading works written by anarchists, fascists, communists, primitivists, libertarians *shudders*, Greens, or republicans, there is usually something to glean from the authors in question even if you vehemently disagree with their foundation.

(Yes, even libertarians have, on occasion, some insight to offer)

American "politics" is a different story. I laugh at  the retarded conservatives who lament that "Our FF (founding fathers) would never have allowed all these rabble / riffraff to participate in our system" (the expansion of voting privileges to all citizens) given the irony that THEY are the same trash the FF would indubitably despise and scorn. 

I ALSO laugh at retarded liberals who mutter platitudes on the critical nature of voting. "Voting is one of the most sacred duties of citizens. Coz democracy!" 

(As Emma Goldman said, if voting changed anything they would make it illegal.)

Now if you disparage the sanctity of voting, retarded liberals and conservatives will cite a laundry list of "landmark legislation" that arose allegedly from checking some boxes or marking circles on ballots (or entering your preferences into a computer hosted by...*drumroll* Dominion).

What these retards don't realize is that 

A) People voted
B) Stuff happens

Does not mean A caused B.

For example, retarded liberals will say voting gave them the welfare state as initiated under FDR. What they don't know is that pretty much every existing system of capitalism (in "developed" countries) comes with a welfare state, meaning it was inevitable (FDR or no FDR). Likewise, conservative retards still salivate at the thought of the "Reagan years." They don't know the falling rate of capitalist profit due to competition and saturation (from 1945 -1975) birthed the neoliberal agenda of tax cutting, offshoring jobs, Bain-style vulture capitalism (raiding pensions, "restructuring," and selling "non-vital" assets), and "free trade" agreements to salvage corporations headed for bankruptcy.

But anyway, my thesis is this:

If you are an "extremist" then you have every reason to be involved in politics as your viewpoints are ill represented or not represented at all. Yep, Trotskyists and American "National Socialists" are both legit/have reason to be involved.

​​​​
However, the vast majority of political junkies (as peepee might say: "Trumptards, Bidentards, Obamatards, Bushtards, etceteratards") are not extremists. Our lord and savior of this forum @GeorgeWashington has made the case, correctly, that both conservative and liberal (retards) are CONSTITUTIONAL MODERATES.

IOW they are DEFENDERS of the status quo. Their viewpoints are perfectly represented by the DeSantises, the Trumps, the Hillaries, the Bidens, and even the Sanders(es) of our system.

SO WHY THE **** DO YOU WASTE ALL THIS TIME SPEWING GARBAGE ABOUT "DEMOCRAPS" OR "RETHUGS?"

Your "ideas" (flimsy/retarded that they are) are already being represented by the system we live in. 

​​​​(Imagine living in a one-party state like North Korea and shilling for Kim. THAT's how **** stupid you asswipes are - except you shill for the Republicrats.

The reason our system "sucks" is its qualities are perpetuated by trash like YOU.)

at least your screen name is correct.

Didn't read.

Lincoln Nebraska » 01 Aug 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2023, 11:50 am

Didn't read.

Others have. Doesn't matter what you do or don't, will or won't, can't or unable. All you do do, is chant a social mantra promising tomorrows when evolving never exceeds adapting in the moment here combining past, current events, next generations repeating the previous generations social pretending life exceeds now.

Nostradamus'omh » 01 Aug 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2023, 2:07 pm

Others have. Doesn't matter what you do or don't, will or won't, can't or unable. All you do do, is chant a social mantra promising tomorrows when evolving never exceeds adapting in the moment here combining past, current events, next generations repeating the previous generations social pretending life exceeds now.

lol  Nobody reads your posts.  

Lincoln Nebraska » 02 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm

lol  Nobody reads your posts.  

Social minds have no body, just a career character role to play, so you are telling the intellectual truth about those governed by hope, faith, charity, mayhem, madness, misery comes down on anyone not pretending eternity cannot be the moment here.

Motive is desire for power, wealth, fame directing outcomes arriving now won't happen until tomorrow.