I still have mine.RebelGator » 03 Aug 2023, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑ Pick a random voter in New Mexico and tell them to produce the ballot they filled out.
You lose.
I have no idea why Trump included New Mexico in the scheme.golfboy » 01 Aug 2023, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats kept changing the rules and recounting to "find votes" until AlGore won Florida.
Kerry and Democrats questioned elections and voting machines. Odd how it's always different when liberals do the same thing.
Multiple Democrats illegally changed voting rules, which is how Joe Biden "won".
There is nothing you can say, that will ever change that fact.
Relax, nitwit!Bruce » 01 Aug 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Wait.
Stop.
The entire constitution rests on one assumption
The states conduct elections every four years.
In every state, all of them, even in Mississippi the Democrats all get ready to send six Democrats to electors even though they know beyond doubt the Republicans will win Mississippi.
What if next year Biden needs 6 electoral votes from blood red Mississippi.
Can he just say the voting machines in Mississippi were rigged, and he actually won, and convince thde six geezer Democrats down there to assemble and certify their six votes to take to Kamala Harris?
Or would Kamala tell Joe to **** off?
Jack Smith must prove it, be he’s charged Trump with assembling fake electors in solid blue New Mexico, which is controllled top to bottom by Democrats.
A question
Why in the hell would Trump want to claim victory in New Mexico?
No sane person would believe it.
Yes, Trump had access to the best attorneys and each one told him he had lost the election and went on record they were not part of an attempted coup.![]()
![]()
![]()
Zeets2
Relax, nitwit!
If Trump has the proof that there was fraud in the NM vote, he can easily provide it in his upcoming trial AFTER he presents the discovery he's entitled to obtain by witnesses who will be brought in under oath and under subpoena, now that he's been charged with making "criminal accusations of voter fraud".
If he presents the law stating that it was illegal for NM to place mail-in ballot boxes, that will be revealed as well.
And states like AZ, MI, WI, PA, and GA ALL HAVE PLENTY OF EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD that will be revealed under discovery, that your newest crush Jack Smith was stupid enough to force by including such idiotic "felonies" onto his list of indictment charges.
One last question, genius.
You think that a guy like Trump who has access to the best and smartest attorneys in the world hasn't already been advised on those issues, either then or now? And following the legal advice of your attorneys, ESPECIALLY FOR A PRESIDENT cannot be considered a crime!
You have one thing and one thing only going for you brain-dead blind liberals. The judge and jury in the swamp of DC Democrats care or know NOTHING about the law, and will ram it through the DOJ without blinking an eye! It's when the case goes before the Appellate court in a different venue that the REAL case will be adjudicated.
So he doesn't have to prove the election was "perfect"? Sure he does. Plus he has to prove Trump wanted a congressional proceeding that could only help him interfered with. In his head no less! The odd part being is that you still think this is about one or the other parties. What a dumb ***.Squatchman » 03 Aug 2023, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
. The grasping and flailing is getting desperate!
In New Mexico the state is so blue it has all Democrats as both Senators, all three Reps, all the state officers, and huge Democratic majorities in both chambers.Nostradamus'omh » 03 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Bruce, do the county by county maps and be sure to show where urban sprawl is always blue compare to the mostly red rural areas where persons are more self reliant and too busy taking care of their own to play reality's what-if-tomorrow-isms and what about they, them, and those people.
Evolving is a universal time of adapting to the moment here as specifically ancestrally positioned proportionately alive.
Bruce » 01 Aug 2023, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It would be wise for no more repeat attacks on our Capitol the next time they certify the electoral vote count.
The gubbermint owns all the Predator drones and A-10s.
There would be dead MAGAS stacked seven deep.
It is a long way from security concerns to proof of voter fraud.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You look so stupid, so brainwashed and so backed into a corner..but don't let that stop you....![]()
Witness testimony describes how Dominion took over Georgia voting machines remotely during election (bizpacreview.com)
Sorry *******. Jack said Trump's claims were wrong. Now Jack gets to prove that claim in court.Squatchman » 03 Aug 2023, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
. The grasping and flailing is getting desperate!
Election fraud has been proven over and over to not have happened.golfboy » 03 Aug 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry *******. Jack said Trump's claims were wrong. Now Jack gets to prove that claim in court.
With proof.
You pretend to be socially wise, yet instinctively unaware living works in series parallel energy flow.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ In New Mexico the state is so blue it has all Democrats as both Senators, all three Reps, all the state officers, and huge Democratic majorities in both chambers.
Seriously, why was New Mexico part of the scheme?
It makes no sense.
Could it be the name?
That somehow New Mexicans are actually Mexicans?
lol. Show me that proof. Oh wait, you can't because you're lying and it didn't happen.Squatchman » 04 Aug 2023, 2:38 am » wrote: ↑ Election fraud has been proven over and over to not have happened.
The only proof he needs has already been presented.
You're quite funny in your firm belief that there was election fraud. In a **** in the head kind of way.
MAGA, ****.
Excuse me.golfboy » 04 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ lol. Show me that proof. Oh wait, you can't because you're lying and it didn't happen.
And there's the broken record again.Bruce » 04 Aug 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Excuse me.
No amount of voter fraud could possibly turn New Mexico from blue to red.
They probably have drive through abortion clinics in New Mexico. It’s as blue a state as a state can be blue.
Why did Trump send a false elector count for New Mexico to Mike Pence.
That was illegal as hell.
You can’t just make up **** nobody believes is true and then act on it.
No please help me understand.golfboy » 04 Aug 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ And there's the broken record again.
I've already shown you that you're wrong about a 2nd slate of electors.
Just tuck your tail and walk away.
You said alternative electors are illegal. You are wrong, and in fact, Federal law describes how to deal with this happening.Bruce » 04 Aug 2023, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No please help me understand.
Seriously.
The other six states, took days to count the votes.
New Mexico went in the Democrat column less than an hour after the polls closed. It’s as blue as California, Washington and Oregon. It’s been blue forever.
There was never any controversy about New Mexico.
Trump lost New Mexico in 2016 by 6 points and 11 in 2020.
Please, give me any reason Trump’s lawyers included a super blue state in their plan?
which is not a problem.golfboy » 03 Aug 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry *******. Jack said Trump's claims were wrong. Now Jack gets to prove that claim in court.
With proof.
Really? How about you show us that there was no fraud?
Actually, the onus is on those who are CLAIMING voter fraud to prove that it happened. No one has done THIS. Why NOT?golfboy » 04 Aug 2023, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Really? How about you show us that there was no fraud?
No one has done this. Why not?