Liberal Forum

Malthusian population control  - i.e. the forced reduction in births and increased death rate to save more of the planet for elite leftists.

No, the dumbest (and most dangerous) idea was a rehash of the widely discredited authoritarian idea from the 1960s and 1970s — Population Reduction. Dopey Bernie Sanders was asked by a communist school teacher whether it would even be possible to fight global warming given without forcing people to engage in "one-child-per-couple", like China did.Mr. Sanders obediently blurted out an emphatic "no", and then meandered into a discussion about a woman’s right to choose and better access to birth control.  

Here we go again. In the 1960s, biologist Paul Ehrlich of Stanford  the initiator of Zero Population Growth became the patron saint of the modern population control movement that the only way to save the planet from environmental doomsday was to force people to have fewer children.  The Progressive Democrats used this as a rallying cry for Stalinistic population control measures around the world. This led to tens of millions of forced abortions, involuntary sterilization programs, forced contraception and even homicidal infanticide — all in the name of saving the planet.   

They changed their look, changed the words and changed their approach, but these same people are now the core of the radical greens and what the want is you, your family, and your babies DEAD.
 

Why? Most of them are science deniers...they think it's possible to transition from male to female.

ConsRule » 03 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm

Why? Most of them are science deniers...they think it's possible to transition from male to female.

They are more accurately "Science Manipulators".  They haven't a clue what science really is.  They don't know math, physics, chemistry, or even biology.  What they do know how to do is use government agencies to issue grants as "graft" to drum up bogus private studies to support whatever it is that they are against that day.