
They likely will grant it.ConsRule » 03 Aug 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ This is assuming she stays on the case. Her past comments from the bench clearly shows a bias related to Jan 6...expect a defense motion for her recusal.
Except for maybe OJ.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ In the entire history of the United States this is the most important criminal trial ever to be held.
It sounds like you have not only accepted, but are happy about, the fact that the judges are clearly biased about sending Trump to prison, regardless.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The judges will be triple careful not to leave Trump one issue on appeal
If it happens. In don't expect it to start before election day next year. On CNN, one of the defense attorneys made a point even some of the liberal talking heads nodded to in agreement. The prosecution has had over two years to build a case and gather evidence...it is unrealistic to expect the defense to go through everything and be ready for trial in just a few months. Remember, we are just 15 months from Election Day.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ They likely will grant it.
In the entire history of the United States this is the most important criminal trial ever to be held.
Any federal judge will send Trump to prison for attempting a soft coup of the United States government.
He tried to steal New Mexico’s electoral votes.
If we tried that **** we’d stay in jail until trial.
The judges will be triple careful not to leave Trump one issue on appeal.
Any normal person would have "a bias" toward Jan. 6. Far as I know her bias has been prison sentences within the guidelines for the arrested thugs. They likely won't grant it.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ They likely will grant it.
In the entire history of the United States this is the most important criminal trial ever to be held.
Any federal judge will send Trump to prison for attempting a soft coup of the United States government.
He tried to steal New Mexico’s electoral votes.
If we tried that **** we’d stay in jail until trial.
The judges will be triple careful not to leave Trump one issue on appeal.
Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanya_S._Chutkan
Chutkan was born on July 5, 1962, in Kingston, Jamaica.[1] She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 from George Washington University. She later attended the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she was an associate editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. She graduated in 1987 with a Juris Doctor.[2]
——
Spin one for The Donald!
https://youtu.be/oxFVB4MGEv4
The time it took to track down evidence of what Trump did in relation to Jan. 6 isn't a measure of the response time it should take Trump, who knows what he did.ConsRule » 03 Aug 2023, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ If it happens. In don't expect it to start before election day next year. On CNN, one of the defense attorneys made a point even some of the liberal talking heads nodded to in agreement. The prosecution has had over two years to build a case and gather evidence...it is unrealistic to expect the defense to go through everything and be ready for trial in just a few months. Remember, we are just 15 months from Election Day.
The media circus for the OJ trial is a pale shadow of this case.
The only black justice on the Supreme Court, the most conservative of the nine, has a wife named Ginni who was part of the conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ “They” know what they are doing to keep **** stirred up
January 6th chairman
[img]blob:b7588ad5-2722-4ac5-a442-dc3e4feea883[/img]
https://www.witf.io/wp-content/uploads/ ... 0x1037.jpg
Georgia prosecutor
[img]blob:6fa94e5f-63e7-448f-be88-083dfe7c3bfb[/img]
https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqj ... /-1x-1.jpg
Weird, almost like they have a plan
what does that have to do with what you replied to?Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ The only black justice on the Supreme Court, the most conservative of the nine, has a wife named Ginni who was part of the conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.
—-Conservative activist Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, told the House Jan. 6 committee Thursday that she still believes the 2020 election was stolen, the panel's chairman said.Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., didn't give many other details about the interview.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna49967
—-
Ginni Thomas involvement in 1/6/21 was so deep the speculation is she is Co Conspirator Number 6
Bring along the popcorn truck.
I wonder about the lengthy prison sentences for Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler Schumer, and Fauci. Do you think they'll be within the guidelines or will the Judge go beyond them as was the case with the trespassers?jack » 03 Aug 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Any normal person would have "a bias" toward Jan. 6. Far as I know her bias has been prison sentences within the guidelines for the arrested thugs. They likely won't grant it.
What did they track down, or are you just coughing up a hairball?jack » 03 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The time it took to track down evidence of what Trump did in relation to Jan. 6 isn't a measure of the response time it should take Trump, who knows what he did.
He will have to explain just why he needs more time than the prosecution's time table calls for.
MAGA loves black Judge Thomas
The prosecution doesn't set the time table, dick breath.jack » 03 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The time it took to track down evidence of what Trump did in relation to Jan. 6 isn't a measure of the response time it should take Trump, who knows what he did.
He will have to explain just why he needs more time than the prosecution's time table calls for.
Unless, if convicted, the sentence is suspended.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑
If convicted a former President of the United States is going to the slammer.
Try a little harder to understand what you read. Might not help, but try.