If you stood up in just about any employees lunch room in the USA and were openly critical of Obamacare, Illegal Aliens, Trans Agendaetc....you would find yourself at least warned by the "Progressive" HR Rep that they have zero tolerance for your racist, xenophobic and homophobic remarks.LowIQTrash » 07 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ American conservatives have fallen quite some ways.
From "say no to drugs" to "Clinton lied about a blowjob" to "waterboarding isn't torture and Gitmo isn't a homosexual prison site" to "Barry is a soshulizt who also inexplicably loves Wall St" to the Orange Dotard who failed to build a wall, one wonders at the identity of this rather unskilled "chess player" making every move for the conservative retards who gleefully get strung along like a puppet at the muppet show.
Now take a step back for a moment. Your opponents are Democrats who support open borders, the "tranny agenda," outsourcing jobs + insourcing via H1Bs to suppress white collar wages, and apparently a dementia diaper **** for the WH seat. And homeless people **** and peeing on public property.
Let's not even get into the specifics about their disastrous policies, such as Obamacare causing health insurance prices to skyrocket as well as tax rates that punish the upper middle class ($250K - $1M income/yr) while, magically, the truly wealthy ($40M+ NW) escape unscathed. Just a coincidence I'm sure...
Anyway, given these...handicaps...imposed upon your opponents, a casual and astute observer like myself would ASSUME that conservatives would have an easy game to play. It's literally beating up some 5 yr olds on the playground or going up against someone with 1200 ELO.
Alas, given the results, conservatives received 2 J's at a Texass Hold 'Em round and still ended up losing.
You guys are truly pitiful idiots.
LowIQTrash » 07 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ American conservatives have fallen quite some ways.
From "say no to drugs" to "Clinton lied about a blowjob" to "waterboarding isn't torture and Gitmo isn't a homosexual prison site" to "Barry is a soshulizt who also inexplicably loves Wall St" to the Orange Dotard who failed to build a wall, one wonders at the identity of this rather unskilled "chess player" making every move for the conservative retards who gleefully get strung along like a puppet at the muppet show.
Now take a step back for a moment. Your opponents are Democrats who support open borders, the "tranny agenda," outsourcing jobs + insourcing via H1Bs to suppress white collar wages, and apparently a dementia diaper **** for the WH seat. And homeless people **** and peeing on public property.
Let's not even get into the specifics about their disastrous policies, such as Obamacare causing health insurance prices to skyrocket as well as tax rates that punish the upper middle class ($250K - $1M income/yr) while, magically, the truly wealthy ($40M+ NW) escape unscathed. Just a coincidence I'm sure...
Anyway, given these...handicaps...imposed upon your opponents, a casual and astute observer like myself would ASSUME that conservatives would have an easy game to play. It's literally beating up some 5 yr olds on the playground or going up against someone with 1200 ELO.
Alas, given the results, conservatives received 2 J's at a Texass Hold 'Em round and still ended up losing.
You guys are truly pitiful idiots.
Fallen?.....**** No....LowIQTrash » 07 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ American conservatives have fallen quite some ways.
From "say no to drugs" to "Clinton lied about a blowjob" to "waterboarding isn't torture and Gitmo isn't a homosexual prison site" to "Barry is a soshulizt who also inexplicably loves Wall St" to the Orange Dotard who failed to build a wall, one wonders at the identity of this rather unskilled "chess player" making every move for the conservative retards who gleefully get strung along like a puppet at the muppet show.
Now take a step back for a moment. Your opponents are Democrats who support open borders, the "tranny agenda," outsourcing jobs + insourcing via H1Bs to suppress white collar wages, and apparently a dementia diaper **** for the WH seat. And homeless people **** and peeing on public property.
Let's not even get into the specifics about their disastrous policies, such as Obamacare causing health insurance prices to skyrocket as well as tax rates that punish the upper middle class ($250K - $1M income/yr) while, magically, the truly wealthy ($40M+ NW) escape unscathed. Just a coincidence I'm sure...
Anyway, given these...handicaps...imposed upon your opponents, a casual and astute observer like myself would ASSUME that conservatives would have an easy game to play. It's literally beating up some 5 yr olds on the playground or going up against someone with 1200 ELO.
Alas, given the results, conservatives received 2 J's at a Texass Hold 'Em round and still ended up losing.
You guys are truly pitiful idiots.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0VNHe5fq30PhiloBeddo » 07 Aug 2023, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Slim Pickens was a great actor. I loved him in Blazing Saddles.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Fuelman » 07 Aug 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The last poll I saw for party identification:
25% Democrats
27% Republican
Time for a 3rd party!
Fuelman » 07 Aug 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The last poll I saw for party identification:
25% Democrats
27% Republican
Time for a 3rd party!
Fuelman » 07 Aug 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The last poll I saw for party identification:
25% Democrats
27% Republican
Time for a 3rd party!
First of all, "my ****" doesn't exist. My views are hardly represented by any particular group. You thought I was a LIBRUL or Progressive?Majik » 07 Aug 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Fallen?.....**** No....
If we actually had a MSM, Judicial system , and a non-censoring tech/ Social media industry that wasn't politically compromised by Liberal and Progressive loony idealism and ideology and a government that openly lies to Amerca. .....most of the country would be shunning if not stringing you **** up.....
and that's a fact ....
It's everyone's problem regardless of political persuasion. ....even your's.....LowIQTrash » 24 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ First of all, "my ****" doesn't exist. My views are hardly represented by any particular group. You thought I was a LIBRUL or Progressive?
Second of all, by YOU conservative retards' own logic, that's YOUR problem. Corporations own the media. Corporations own the major social media platforms. According to YOU guys, shouldn't the corporations be FREE to do what they want without the GUBMINT interfering in their business? If they want to push "loony idealism and [leftist] ideology" and censor conservative POVs then they have every RIGHT to do so.
![]()
Thankfully, people like @Cannonpointer @FOS and myself are NOT conservative (retards) so we would havE ZERO qualms regulating or nationalizing these corps.
Spot on.LowIQTrash » 24 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑First of all, "my ****" doesn't exist. My views are hardly represented by any particular group. You thought I was a LIBRUL or Progressive?Majik » 07 Aug 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Fallen?.....**** No....
If we actually had a MSM, Judicial system , and a non-censoring tech/ Social media industry that wasn't politically compromised by Liberal and Progressive loony idealism and ideology and a government that openly lies to Amerca. .....most of the country would be shunning if not stringing you **** up.....
and that's a fact ....
Second of all, by YOU conservative retards' own logic, that's YOUR problem. Corporations own the media. Corporations own the major social media platforms. According to YOU guys, shouldn't the corporations be FREE to do what they want without the GUBMINT interfering in their business? If they want to push "loony idealism and [leftist] ideology" and censor conservative POVs then they have every RIGHT to do so.
![]()
Thankfully, people like @Cannonpointer @FOS and myself are NOT conservative (retards) so we would havE ZERO qualms regulating or nationalizing these corps.
He makes a good point. It is conservative ideology which allows every bit of this to be funded by the golems which conservative ideology defends.Majik » 24 Aug 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ It's everyone's problem regardless of political persuasion. ....even your's.....
Cannonpointer » 24 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ He makes a good point. It is conservative ideology which allows every bit of this to be funded by the golems which conservative ideology defends.
I have to disagree...Cannonpointer » 24 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ He makes a good point. It is conservative ideology which allows every bit of this to be funded by the golems which conservative ideology defends.