Liberal Forum

I am writing to notify you of a fascinating case-study that I conducted on the operation of the state courts, in Oregon. There is no doubt that a judicial dictatorship operates at Multnomah County Court (Presiding Judge, Judith Matarazzo). This state of affairs has been brought about by the operation of a court rule, What is SLR 7.045?
This rule explains to any member of the general public (lawyers and pro se litigants) what they must do to remove (”recuse”) a judge who they believe to be malicious or biased.
However, the provisions of SLR 7.045 are written to make that impossible, even for a lawyer. In this way, corrupt judges protect themselves and deny the people of Oregon a fair trial. The detail of rule 7.045 is available online, by way of a search engine query. When you check the rule you will find that in order to recuse a judge any member of the public must do the following impossible tasks:
 -Report any concerns to the court in writing on the exact day of the judge’s assignment to the case. As well as the obvious unreasonableness this term means that judges are impervious to censure throughout the proceedings;
 -Produce three separate legal documents within 24 hours of notifying the court: An order; An affidavit. An affidavit must be notarized. However, it takes to organize a notary public’s appearance at a place such as FedEx. Each document should meet the court’s requirements for format and presentation. Obviously, 24 hours is not a sufficient time allowance even if a notary public could be found within 24 hours;
 -If a member of the public (or pro se litigant) makes an error, then the rule threatens to bring sanctions upon them, “including” economic sanctions.There are many severe problems with the justice system. This rule is something that can, and must, be changed.

The wider question is then one of where else in Oregon does this fraudulent rule exist?

Judge Judith Matarazzo. It is not surprising that Multnomah is a remarkably corrupt courthouse. The Presiding Judge is Judith Matarazzo. In 2017, the County DA’s office decided to steer criminal cases away from Judith, saying publicly that she is not “fair and impartial” (OregonLive, June 21, 2017). The DA’s complaints stretched back to 2008. Yet, she is now a Presiding Judge, appointed in the March of 2022. It is a state of affairs that invites your organization to act in the public interest: Abolish this rule and replace it with a rule that coheres with Federal Law (28 USC, s. 455). The correct rule would operate in every state courthouse in Oregon. 
Challenging the rule - “a facial challenge”. SLR 7.045 affects everybody in the same way. This means that this issue is open to a facial challenge. Any individual or organization may challenge the rule at any time. I will be writing to Multnomah Court on this matter, and I expect to file a facial challenge to this rule, pursuant to SLR 1.050(1)(b). Then, the state Supreme Court plays a most important role in solving this because the Supreme Court must approve SLRs. It remains to be seen what the higher courts and the state and federal DA’s offices will say about this. Previous experience predicts yet more obstruction and fraud. Wherever rule 7.045 exists it is profanely illegal. It contradicts the essence of a justice system, violating each and every person’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. The attachment shows a warning message generated by an intrusion into my electronic case file from inside the Court on a Saturday evening.
 =12.0000pt=11.5000pt
 
 

Leonard00 » 12 Aug 2023, 3:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 3:46 am

I am writing to notify you of a fascinating case-study that I conducted on the operation of the state courts, in Oregon. There is no doubt that a judicial dictatorship operates at Multnomah County Court (Presiding Judge, Judith Matarazzo). This state of affairs has been brought about by the operation of a court rule, What is SLR 7.045?
This rule explains to any member of the general public (lawyers and pro se litigants) what they must do to remove (”recuse”) a judge who they believe to be malicious or biased.
However, the provisions of SLR 7.045 are written to make that impossible, even for a lawyer. In this way, corrupt judges protect themselves and deny the people of Oregon a fair trial. The detail of rule 7.045 is available online, by way of a search engine query. When you check the rule you will find that in order to recuse a judge any member of the public must do the following impossible tasks:
 -Report any concerns to the court in writing on the exact day of the judge’s assignment to the case. As well as the obvious unreasonableness this term means that judges are impervious to censure throughout the proceedings;
 -Produce three separate legal documents within 24 hours of notifying the court: An order; An affidavit. An affidavit must be notarized. However, it takes to organize a notary public’s appearance at a place such as FedEx. Each document should meet the court’s requirements for format and presentation. Obviously, 24 hours is not a sufficient time allowance even if a notary public could be found within 24 hours;
 -If a member of the public (or pro se litigant) makes an error, then the rule threatens to bring sanctions upon them, “including” economic sanctions.There are many severe problems with the justice system. This rule is something that can, and must, be changed.

The wider question is then one of where else in Oregon does this fraudulent rule exist?

Judge Judith Matarazzo. It is not surprising that Multnomah is a remarkably corrupt courthouse. The Presiding Judge is Judith Matarazzo. In 2017, the County DA’s office decided to steer criminal cases away from Judith, saying publicly that she is not “fair and impartial” (OregonLive, June 21, 2017). The DA’s complaints stretched back to 2008. Yet, she is now a Presiding Judge, appointed in the March of 2022. It is a state of affairs that invites your organization to act in the public interest: Abolish this rule and replace it with a rule that coheres with Federal Law (28 USC, s. 455). The correct rule would operate in every state courthouse in Oregon. 
Challenging the rule - “a facial challenge”. SLR 7.045 affects everybody in the same way. This means that this issue is open to a facial challenge. Any individual or organization may challenge the rule at any time. I will be writing to Multnomah Court on this matter, and I expect to file a facial challenge to this rule, pursuant to SLR 1.050(1)(b). Then, the state Supreme Court plays a most important role in solving this because the Supreme Court must approve SLRs. It remains to be seen what the higher courts and the state and federal DA’s offices will say about this. Previous experience predicts yet more obstruction and fraud. Wherever rule 7.045 exists it is profanely illegal. It contradicts the essence of a justice system, violating each and every person’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. The attachment shows a warning message generated by an intrusion into my electronic case file from inside the Court on a Saturday evening.
 =12.0000pt=11.5000pt

Sounds like a there are some really ****, self-serving assholes running Oregon.
Big surprise.

Not sure it matters much anywhere in the US -

esp *** DC

DeezerShoove » 13 Aug 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 7:55 am

Sounds like a there are some really ****, self-serving assholes running Oregon.
Big surprise.

****, self serving assholes make up the majority of "career" politicians in DC and the upper levels of most State Governments in this Country anymore.

People like this asshole define "American Politician" anymore....


 
 
 

This state of affairs puts to rest any questions about whether Liberal Fascism is a thing or not.
It's been awhile since I've heard any news about Portland. Not very long ago Portland was a very safe and fun place to visit with several great night spots. There was a strong police presense in the downtown area..I believe in order to keep the ****** from the east side of I-5 from expanding their territory.
So my question is....has Portland returned to a place where decent law abiding people can park their cars on the street at night and walk the sidewalks without encountering  Sub Human Liberal **** everywhere...?
 

Always Google it first!

—-

Multnomah County was a strongly Republican county for much of the first half of the 20th century, but since 1964, it has been the strongest Democratic bastion in Oregon. The Democrats have failed to win a majority in the county only two times since then, in 1972 and 1980.

As Multnomah County is by far the most populous county in Oregon, Democratic majorities in the county are often enough to swing the results in statewide elections. In 2008, Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley unseated incumbent two-term Senator Gordon Smith, though Smith carried 28 of Oregon's 36 counties. Merkley carried Multnomah County by over 142,000 votes, however, enough to allow him to defeat Smith by 59,100 votes.

The county courthouse is located in downtown Portland. The Multnomah County Central Courthouse opened in 2020, replacing a century-old building nearby that was in need of seismic retrofitting.[34]

——

Hmmm

What would cause a solid Republican city to turn so Democratic the Republicans’ thoughts and prayers go unheeded?

Any ideas?

The Old Criminal Rapist

babbling non-sense again

https://twitter.com/i/status/1690125941907877888

Sumela » 13 Aug 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 12:31 pm

The Old Criminal Rapist

babbling non-sense again

https://twitter.com/i/status/1690125941907877888

AND THE DEMENTIA PEDOPHILE WALKED DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO THE EDGE UNTIL HIS NURSING AIDS HAD TO GRAB HOLD AND STEER HIM AWAY.      

Bruce » 13 Aug 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 11:58 am

Always Google it first!

—-

Multnomah County was a strongly Republican county for much of the first half of the 20th century, but since 1964, it has been the strongest Democratic bastion in Oregon. The Democrats have failed to win a majority in the county only two times since then, in 1972 and 1980.

As Multnomah County is by far the most populous county in Oregon, Democratic majorities in the county are often enough to swing the results in statewide elections. In 2008, Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley unseated incumbent two-term Senator Gordon Smith, though Smith carried 28 of Oregon's 36 counties. Merkley carried Multnomah County by over 142,000 votes, however, enough to allow him to defeat Smith by 59,100 votes.

The county courthouse is located in downtown Portland. The Multnomah County Central Courthouse opened in 2020, replacing a century-old building nearby that was in need of seismic retrofitting.[34]

——

Hmmm

What would cause a solid Republican city to turn so Democratic the Republicans’ thoughts and prayers go unheeded?

Any ideas?

ONE OF TWO THINGS, VOTER CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION WITHIN LOCAL POLITICS.
 

righteous » 13 Aug 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 12:41 pm

AND THE DEMENTIA PEDOPHILE WALKED DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO THE EDGE UNTIL HIS NURSING AIDS HAD TO GRAB HOLD AND STEER HIM AWAY.   

LMAO.

And the morons clapping for the "9" wonders of the world....lol, libbies
 

righteous » 13 Aug 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 12:44 pm

ONE OF TWO THINGS, VOTER CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION WITHIN LOCAL POLITICS.

The county voted 80% for Biden.

They are 80% liberals.  Most liberal city in America.

And that’s a choice they made.

 

Bruce » 13 Aug 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 12:50 pm

The county voted 80% for Biden.

They are 80% liberals.  Most liberal city in America.

And that’s a choice they made.

MOST OF THE STATE RESIDENTS ARE MENTALLY ILL LEFTISTS FOLLOWING THE RADICAL LEFT AGENDAS.

THE LEFTISTS HAVE ATTEMPTED THINGS THAT THEY WOULD CALL A MOVEMENT IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

ONE SUCH ACTION IN FEBRUARY 2001, THE MULTNOMAH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD AND AUTHORIZED THE LIBRARY TO ENTER INTO A LAWSUIT TO STOP THE CHILDRENS INTERNET PROTECTION ACT
 

righteous » 13 Aug 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 1:24 pm

MOST OF THE STATE RESIDENTS ARE MENTALLY ILL LEFTISTS FOLLOWING THE RADICAL LEFT AGENDAS.

THE LEFTISTS HAVE ATTEMPTED THINGS THAT THEY WOULD CALL A MOVEMENT IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

ONE SUCH ACTION IN FEBRUARY 2001, THE MULTNOMAH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD AND AUTHORIZED THE LIBRARY TO ENTER INTO A LAWSUIT TO STOP THE CHILDRENS INTERNET PROTECTION ACT

You expected liberals to censor books?

There needs to be a huge signs

MOST LIBERAL CITY IN AMERICA

hung with all the city limits signs.

imatellenya these are liberal sons of bitches

Why?

Bruce » 13 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm

You expected liberals to censor books?

There needs to be a huge signs

MOST LIBERAL CITY IN AMERICA

hung with all the city limits signs.

imatellenya these are liberal sons of bitches

Why?

WHOSE TALKING ABOUT BOOKS, NUMBNUTS? WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT ON ANOTHER THREAD
YOU'RE MORE IGNORANT THAN I SURMISED YOU WERE, LEFTIST FRUITCAKE.
 
**** LIBERALS, ESPECIALLY JEWS, TURN A CHEEK TO POISONING A CHILDS MIND WITH PORNOGRAPHY, IN FACT THEY ENCOURAGE IT.

CIPA requires K-12 schools and libraries to operate "a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that protects against access through such computers to visual depictions that are obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors". Such a technology protection measure must be employed "during any use of such computers by minors". 

In February 2001, the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners unanimously accepted the recommendation of the Library Advisory Board and authorized the library to enter into a lawsuit to stop the Children's Internet Protection Act. The US Supreme Court ultimately decided in 2003 that the law was constitutional and reversed a lower appeals court decision.

—-

Those liberals lost the lawsuit twenty years ago.

Did you expect liberals to censor anything?

Why, are they so liberal in Portland?