Liberal Forum

Not enough time has past to renew the "Kavanaugh Hoax" so you have to work with what you got.....Left attempt to get the black guy instead!...easy target Ocasio-Cortez and four of her Democratic colleagues sent a letter to AG Merrick Garland demanding the investigation

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-de ... -megadonor



 

Thomas is just the ripest target for the leftists to go after on the SCOTUS in their attempt to reform the Court.

I can promise that if the SCOTUS was leaning 6-3 Progressive right now, we would be hearing none of this talk about judicial term limits, stacking the court, or investigating anybody.

nefarious101 » 12 Aug 2023, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:12 am

Not enough time has past to renew the "Kavanaugh Hoax" so you have to work with what you got.....Left attempt to get the black guy instead!...easy target Ocasio-Cortez and four of her Democratic colleagues sent a letter to AG Merrick Garland demanding the investigation

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-de ... -megadonor

Thomas is BLACK and they can't be havin' no "Uncle Tom" sitting on the SCOTUS and ruling against their NAZI PROGRESSIVE-ISM.

I mean how in the hell are they supposed to DESTROY THIS NATION when you have someone who actually believes and embraces the Constitution of the United States??

Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2023, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:34 am

Thomas is BLACK and they can't be havin' no "Uncle Tom" sitting on the SCOTUS and ruling against their NAZI PROGRESSIVE-ISM.

I mean how in the hell are they supposed to DESTROY THIS NATION when you have someone who actually believes and embraces the Constitution of the United States??

Progressivism is nothing but a media driven hoax machine...as we have all seen....they sure can not govern at all....they are more like a backed government "taxpayer funds" theft ring and money laundering operation than anything else

America's leading crop of future groomers, todays sexually confused educated idiots and child sexualizers told to get on the government tit




Harvard University Encourages Students To Go On Food Stamps, Even Though It's the Richest School In The World With A $53 Billion Endowment



https://finance.yahoo.com/news/harvard- ... p_catchall

Seems "Harry's Razors" has opened the corporate "Trans-Pandora's Box" just like Bud Light, Target, Disney and others tell people everywhere and investors..."Please help us destroy ourselves and your investments in our business"

nefarious101 » 12 Aug 2023, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 8:49 am

Seems "Harry's Razors" has opened the corporate "Trans-Pandora's Box" just like Bud Light, Target, Disney and others tell people everywhere and investors..."Please help us destroy ourselves and your investments in our business"

Harry's Razors went down the toilet long ago.
**** cocksuckers got the boost when Gillette said men are toxic masculinity.
Riding that wave got them going.
Then Harry's went *** on us. **** 'em both.

Now I am with Jeremy's.

In all this posturing of companies pretending to care about something,
I no longer look at saving pennies a week as relevant.

nefarious101 » 12 Aug 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:41 am

Progressivism is nothing but a media driven hoax machine...as we have all seen....they sure can not govern at all....they are more like a backed government "taxpayer funds" theft ring and money laundering operation than anything else

Actually, they are a combination of the COMMUNISTS with a lot of NAZI CONTROL splashed in there for good measure. Not to mention they are now in love with WARS all over the world. You know, so they can "Show their strength" against the very thing they are.

Trust me, they believe that they can make Communism work. As long as THEY are in charge this time.

DeezerShoove » 12 Aug 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 9:11 am

Harry's Razors went down the toilet long ago.
**** cocksuckers got the boost when Gillette said men are toxic masculinity.
Riding that wave got them going.
Then Harry's went *** on us. **** 'em both.

Now I am with Jeremy's.

In all this posturing of companies pretending to care about something,
I no longer look at saving pennies a week as relevant.

The educated idiots running these companies are forcing their employees and investors to fall on the "GAY SWORD" as a sacrifice to their "Man in a Dress" idols.


Fisrt question corporate boards ought to ask is if their prospect hires are Progressives, rinos, ***, trannies or pedophiles....LOL...as if there is a difference between any of them

nefarious101 » 12 Aug 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 10:17 am

The educated idiots running these companies are forcing their employees and investors to fall on the "GAY SWORD" as a sacrifice to their "Man in a Dress" idols.

Fisrt question corporate boards ought to ask is if their prospect hires are Progressives, rinos, ***, trannies or pedophiles....LOL...as if there is a difference between any of them

Personally, I think as far as spinelessness goes, libs/progs take top honors.
Letting some touchy-feely priority take over.
That isn't good for business, politics, leadership.

Losing sight of mission, goals, etc. to appease a single demographic never seems to work.
Demographics change, are fickle, disappear.
Like a People Stock Market. Can't predict enough to be a winner.
The trend right now is an illogical, braying, unreliable mess of a small minority.
The lib supporters out-number the actual people affected.

Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2023, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:34 am

Thomas is BLACK and they can't be havin' no "Uncle Tom" sitting on the SCOTUS and ruling against their NAZI PROGRESSIVE-ISM.

I mean how in the hell are they supposed to DESTROY THIS NATION when you have someone who actually believes and embraces the Constitution of the United States??

That's exactly it. The only thing they hate nearly as much as an outsider like Trump is a black person who won't march to party orders. Johnson described the problem of blacks getting uppity and the solution...AOC isn't as smart as that asshole was. 

DeezerShoove » 12 Aug 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 10:48 am

Personally, I think as far as spinelessness goes, libs/progs take top honors.
Letting some touchy-feely priority take over.
That isn't good for business, politics, leadership.

Losing sight of mission, goals, etc. to appease a single demographic never seems to work.
Demographics change, are fickle, disappear.
Like a People Stock Market. Can't predict enough to be a winner.
The trend right now is an illogical, braying, unreliable mess of a small minority.
The lib supporters out-number the actual people affected.

One hot item this rigged election will be domestic terrorists...parents looking out for their kids in government schools.  Progressive democrats see children as things to kill and sell pieces of them for a profit or sex partners.  Funny how they think they can support a political party that thinks like that and yet give themselves absolution for the things "they say" they don't support.



The new 2024 election theme for the progressive democrats is "If we can't kill it, we want to **** it"....and don't think your family dog is immune or safe from their twisted ideas on normalcy

Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2023, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 9:12 am

Actually, they are a combination of the COMMUNISTS with a lot of NAZI CONTROL splashed in there for good measure. Not to mention they are now in love with WARS all over the world. You know, so they can "Show their strength" against the very thing they are.

Trust me, they believe that they can make Communism work. As long as THEY are in charge this time.

Getting tired of both sides....they both have lied to my face when I lent them my support over the years.  I really see little difference between the two parties

DeezerShoove » 12 Aug 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 10:48 am

Personally, I think as far as spinelessness goes, libs/progs take top honors.
Letting some touchy-feely priority take over.
That isn't good for business, politics, leadership.

Losing sight of mission, goals, etc. to appease a single demographic never seems to work.
Demographics change, are fickle, disappear.
Like a People Stock Market. Can't predict enough to be a winner.
The trend right now is an illogical, braying, unreliable mess of a small minority.
The lib supporters out-number the actual people affected.

I don't look at everyone that calls themselves conservative as a representation of the conservative movement 

I don't see everyone that calls themselves progressive as a representation of the progressive movement 

Some are just the loony left or the loony right

and they are part of the problem 

do you really think that Jimmy Dore is "spineless" ?

 

She's a racist!

Mrkelly » 12 Aug 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 5:49 pm

I don't look at everyone that calls themselves conservative as a representation of the conservative movement 

I don't see everyone that calls themselves progressive as a representation of the progressive movement 

Some are just the loony left or the loony right

and they are part of the problem 

do you really think that Jimmy Dore is "spineless" ?

I love that leap you took to ask me that.
You actually left a giant hole for me to exclude huge swaths of people.

I think you are trying to simplify my broad statement.

Saying a "group" takes top honors already excludes lots of people, knucklehead.
I already covered my butt. Go drip your leftist tears elsewhere.  

DeezerShoove » 12 Aug 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 6:56 pm

I love that leap you took to ask me that.
You actually left a giant hole for me to exclude huge swaths of people.

I think you are trying to simplify my broad statement.

Saying a "group" takes top honors already excludes lots of people, knucklehead.
I already covered my butt. Go drip your leftist tears elsewhere.

and just how did you "exclude a lot of others" ?

They don't call it a broad statement for nothing


 

Mrkelly » 12 Aug 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:00 pm

and just how did you "exclude a lot of others" ?

They don't call it a broad statement for nothing

Are you actually trying to be this way?!

In a list  that has the most of something, obviously other lists contain the same thing.
Just not as many.
One takes top honors: Wins with the most of . . . whatever. Not ALL of . . . whatever.

Is this that tough?

DeezerShoove » 12 Aug 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:10 pm

Are you actually trying to be this way?!

In a list  that has the most of something, obviously other lists contain the same thing.
Just not as many.
One takes top honors: Wins with the most of . . . whatever. Not ALL of . . . whatever.

Is this that tough?

Is it that tough to say it that way?
 

Mrkelly » 12 Aug 2023, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 7:13 pm

Is it that tough to say it that way?

So you accept my intentions but dislike my wording... 

We persons with a vocabulary salute you.